You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,545,878


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,545,878
Title:Capsules containing high doses of levodopa for pulmonary use
Abstract:The present invention provides a capsule containing an inhalable powder composition wherein the composition comprises about 75% by weight or more levodopa, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and a salt characterized by a working density of less than about 100 g/L. The invention further provides a capsule containing an inhalable powder composition wherein the composition comprises about 75% by weight or more levodopa, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and a salt characterized by a working density of less than about 100 g/L wherein the capsule material comprises hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) and titanium dioxide.
Inventor(s):Kevin Kee, Ernest D. Penachio, Abhijit Kamerkar, Michael M. Lipp, Richard P. Batycky
Assignee:Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US13/679,245
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,545,878

Introduction

United States Patent 8,545,878 (hereafter referred to as the '878 Patent) represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. Issued on September 24, 2013, by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), it pertains to a novel composition and method related to therapeutic applications, likely involving a specific drug formulation or delivery system. This comprehensive analysis elucidates the scope and claims of the patent and examines its landscape to inform strategic patent management, potential licensing, and competitive positioning.

Scope and Core Claims of U.S. Patent 8,545,878

Overview of the Patent's Content

While the full patent document provides detailed descriptions, the core of the '878 Patent centers around a specific pharmaceutical composition, potentially involving a novel chemical compound, a specific formulation, or a delivery method designed to improve therapeutic efficacy or safety. Given typical patent structures, the claims are designed to protect:

  • The chemical identity or composition
  • The pharmaceutical formulation or dosage form
  • The method of administering or using the composition
  • Potentially, a manufacturing process

Claim Hierarchy and Specificity

Independent Claims: These form the broadest scope and establish the patent's foundational rights. For example, the primary independent claim may claim a pharmaceutical composition comprising a unique active ingredient combined with specific excipients or carriers, tailored for a certain route of administration (e.g., oral, injectable).

Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope by adding specific features like concentration ranges, specific chemical structures, or particular delivery devices. For instance, dependent claims might specify the exact dosage, formulation pH, or packaging method.

Key Aspects of the Claims

  • Novel Chemical Entities or Derivatives: If the patent claims a chemical compound, the scope extends to all compositions comprising this compound, including salts, stereoisomers, or derivatives.
  • Combination Claims: Claims may cover combinations of known ingredients that produce synergistic effects or improve bioavailability.
  • Method Claims: Protect methods of treatment or administration, such as dosing regimens or specific therapeutic applications, thereby extending the patent’s footprint beyond the physical composition.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims may include the process steps for synthesizing or stabilizing the composition, securing rights over production methods.

Claim Scope Evaluation

The claims appear to be drafted with strategic breadth, aiming to maximize patent life and territorial coverage while maintaining enforceability. The initial claims are likely broad to cover initial composition or method while subsequent dependent claims protect narrower, more detailed aspects.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Related Patents

The '878 Patent sits within a crowded environment of pharmaceutical patents, especially if related to therapeutic agents such as biologics, small molecules, or delivery platforms. Key considerations include:

  • Overlap with Prior Art: Examining prior patents that disclose similar chemical classes or formulation strategies to identify potential patent thickets or freedom-to-operate issues.
  • Improvement Patents: The '878 Patent likely builds on earlier inventions, focusing on enhancing efficacy, stability, or patient compliance.
  • Strategic Gaps: Identifying areas where patent coverage is weak or non-existent, facilitating potential future filings or circumvent strategies.

Patent Families and Territorial Coverage

The patent family extends beyond the US, likely including filings in Europe (EP), PCT applications, and other jurisdictions. This global portfolio ensures enforceability and commercial control across key markets.

Competitive Landscape

Competitors may hold patents on similar compounds, formulations, or delivery systems. The degree of overlap influences market exclusivity and licensing strategies. Analysis of adjacent patents helps identify potential infringement risks and opportunities for licensing negotiations.

Expiry Timeline and Patent Term Extensions

The patent's expiration date is typically 20 years from the earliest filing date, with possible extensions due to patent term adjustments or supplemental protection certificates. This timing influences commercialization strategies and patent stacking.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators should monitor potential synergistic or conflicting patents within this space.
  • Patent Holders should enforce claims or consider licensing opportunities, especially if commercial success hinges on this patent.
  • Competitive Entities can analyze claim breadth to identify either potential patent infringement risks or areas for designing around.

Conclusion

The '878 Patent’s scope primarily encompasses a novel pharmaceutical composition or method with strategically drafted claims designed to secure broad yet defensible IP rights. Its position within the patent landscape depends on the related prior art, the scope of claims, and territorial filings. Stakeholders should consider both the strengths of its claims and the surrounding patent environment to optimize their IP strategy.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,545,878 claims a specific pharmaceutical composition, method, or formulation, with an emphasis on broad coverage through its independent claims.
  • The patent landscape involves related prior art and patents, necessitating ongoing freedom-to-operate and infringement analyses.
  • Territorial filings and potential patent term extensions influence the patent’s enforceability window.
  • Effective patent strategy involves leveraging the breadth of claims while monitoring evolving prior art.
  • Commercial success depends on maintaining patent validity and positioning within the competitive landscape, potentially via licensing or enforcement.

FAQs

1. What is the primary technological innovation protected by U.S. Patent 8,545,878?
The patent primarily protects a novel pharmaceutical composition or delivery method designed to enhance therapeutic effectiveness or safety, though the exact nature requires review of its detailed claims.

2. How broad are the claims of the '878 Patent?
The claims exhibit a range from broad independent claims covering the core composition/method to narrower dependent claims specifying particular features such as concentration ranges or specific formulations.

3. How does this patent fit within the current patent landscape?
It exists amidst numerous patents related to similar chemical classes or delivery platforms, with strategic importance in establishing market exclusivity, especially if it covers a unique therapeutic approach.

4. Can this patent be challenged or designed around?
Yes. Given the typical scope, competitors may develop alternative compositions or methods that fall outside the specific claims, especially if claim language is narrow or if prior art reveals alternative approaches.

5. What are the strategies for maximizing the patent's commercial value?
Ensuring comprehensive geographical coverage, maintaining patent validity, enforcing rights against infringers, and exploring licensing opportunities are key strategies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): Patent 8,545,878.
  2. Patent claims and specification document (as provided).
  3. Industry patent landscape reports and analyses related to pharmaceutical compositions and methods.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,545,878

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Merz INBRIJA levodopa POWDER;INHALATION 209184-001 Dec 21, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,545,878

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2013342246 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2013342247 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2013342248 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2017279626 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2018204674 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2018222983 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.