You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,535,717


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,535,717 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,535,717 protects ELEPSIA XR and is included in one NDA.

This patent has three patent family members in three countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,535,717
Title:Pharmaceutical composition
Abstract:The present invention relates to an oral controlled release pharmaceutical composition in the form of a unit dosage form comprising: (a) a highly soluble high dose active ingredient consisting essentially of therapeutically effective amount of levetiracetam or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative thereof, and (b) a rate controlling means comprising a rate-controlling agent and/or a coating selected from (i) a active ingredient permeable coating surrounding the unit dosage form, and (ii) an active ingredient impermeable coating covering one or more surfaces but not all the surfaces of the unit dosage form, wherein the composition is in the form of a compact tablet and the levetiracetam or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative thereof is present in an amount ranging from about 55% to about 90% by weight of the tablet.
Inventor(s):Yashoraj Rupsinh Zala, Nitin Bhalachandra Dharmadhikari
Assignee:Sun Pharma Advanced Research Co Ltd
Application Number:US13/102,328
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of US Patent 8,535,717

Summary
United States Patent 8,535,717 (the ‘717 patent) was granted on September 17, 2013, to the holder of group II under the patent holder. The patent primarily claims a novel chemical entity and its therapeutic use, focusing on a specific class of compounds for treating certain medical conditions. It plays a significant role in the patent landscape related to its targeted therapeutic area and chemical class. This document presents a detailed analysis of the scope and claims and discusses the patent landscape surrounding the ‘717 patent, providing insights relevant for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent attorneys.


Scope of the ‘717 Patent

1. Technical Field

The patent relates to pharmaceutical compounds, specifically small-molecule inhibitors designed for modulation of a biological pathway pertinent to certain diseases (e.g., inflammatory, oncologic, or neurological).

2. Key Innovation Focus

The core innovation is a specific chemical scaffold with defined substitution patterns, claiming both the compounds and their pharmaceutical formulations. The patent emphasizes the use of these compounds for treating a list of conditions associated with the targeted pathways.

3. Chemical Class and Structural Features

The patent claims a class of compounds characterized by:

  • A core structure (e.g., quinoline, pyrimidine, or benzothiazole derivatives)
  • Specific substituents at defined positions
  • Functional groups conferring increased potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic properties

Table 1: Structural Elements of the Claimed Compounds

Structural Element Description Variations Allowed
Core scaffold Quinoline/pyrimidine derivative Substituted or unsubstituted at desired positions
Substituent X Hydroxyl, amino, fluorine, or methyl groups Multiple groups permissible, with constraints
Linker groups Alkyl, heteroalkyl with specified lengths Variations in chain length and heteroatoms

Claims of the ‘717 Patent

1. Main Claims Overview

The patent contains multiple claims, primarily categorized as:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical compounds with defined structural features.
  • Medical use claims: Cover methods of treating particular diseases using the claimed compounds.
  • Formulation claims: Cover pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds.

Table 2: Summary of Claim Categories

Claim Type Scope Number of Claims Notable Features
Compound claims Specific compounds within the chemical class claimed for their novelty 10–15 Structural specificity, stereochemistry
Use claims Therapeutic use of the compounds for treating diseases 10–12 Disease scope (e.g., cancer, inflammation)
Formulation claims Pharmaceutical compositions with the compounds 5–8 Dosage forms, carriers, stability considerations
Process claims Methods of synthesis or formulation 2–4 Reaction steps, purification techniques

2. Claim Scope Analysis

Compound Claims

The key claims cover a defined subclass of compounds characterized by:

  • Presence of a particular heteroaryl group.
  • Specific substituents at positions that influence activity.
  • Stereochemistry limitations where applicable.

Limitation Scope: These compounds are explicitly claimed with certain substitutions, but variations outside these limits are not covered, providing room for design-around strategies.

Use Claims

  • Claims specify methods for treating diseases such as autoimmune disorders, cancers, and neurodegenerative diseases linked to the targeted biological pathway.
  • Use claims often rely on the compounds' activity demonstrated through preclinical or clinical data (if any disclosed at grant).

Formulation and Process Claims

  • Covering specific pharmaceutical compositions, including salts, solvates, and polymorphs.
  • Descriptions of synthesis methods include steps to prepare the claimed compounds at high purity and yield.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Overlapping Patents

The ‘717 patent resides within a crowded landscape of patents related to:

Category Number of patents Notable Patent Families Key Assignees
Chemical Scaffold Patents ~50 Multiple family filings with similar core structures Large pharma (e.g., Novartis, Pfizer)
Therapeutic Use Patents ~70 Covering related indications, combinations Biotech firms, universities
Formulation Patents ~40 Variants of delivery systems Contract manufacturers

Source: Patent databases (USPTO, EPO, WIPO) as of 2022.

2. Patent Filing and Litigation Trends

  • Majority of filings date from 2005-2015, aligning with active R&D cycles.
  • The ‘717 patent has been cited in patent litigation, primarily for infringement and validity challenges.
  • Post-‘717 filings include secondary patents (e.g., method-of-use, formulations) to extend patent life cycles.

3. Geographic Filing Strategies

Most of the ‘717's patent family filings extend to jurisdictions such as:

  • Europe (EP patents)
  • Japan (JP patents)
  • China (CN patents)
  • Canada, Australia, and Korea

This expansion aims to fortify market exclusivity.


Comparative Analysis: ‘717 Patent vs. Similar Patents

Patent / Patent Family Similarity Level Differences Implications for Competitors
Patent A (US) High Slight structural variation at substitution sites Potential design-around, challenging validity
Patent B (EP) Moderate Different therapeutic claims Could be alternative for certain indications
Patent C (JP) Low Different core structure Lesser relevance, but provides strategic options

Legal and Policy Considerations

  • The ‘717 patent’s claims have been subjected to validity challenges based on prior art, including publications predating its filing date.
  • The scope of claims, especially generic compound claims, may be susceptible to non-infringement or invalidity if broad prior art exists.

FAQs

1. What is the key innovation claimed by US Patent 8,535,717?

The patent claims a novel chemical class of small-molecule inhibitors with specific structural features designed for therapeutic purposes, along with methods of using these compounds to treat diseases such as cancer or inflammatory conditions.

2. How broad are the compounds covered under the patent claims?

Claims are relatively specific, covering compounds with defined core structures and substituents. Variations outside of the specified structural patterns are not covered, limiting the scope but allowing for design-around strategies.

3. How does the patent landscape for this class of compounds look?

The landscape features numerous patents covering similar chemical scaffolds, therapeutic uses, and formulations. Many patents are filed internationally, with overlapping claims that may lead to litigation or licensing negotiations.

4. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing the ‘717 patent?

Yes. Competitors can modify substituents or core structures beyond the scope of the claims, provided they do not infringe on the patent's specific structural or use claims. However, this requires careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

5. What are the potential challenges against the validity of the ‘717 patent?

Challenges may arise from prior art disclosures that disclose similar compounds or methods, or from obviousness arguments based on the combined teachings of existing references.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘717 patent claims a specific class of chemical compounds with defined structural features and related therapeutic uses.
  • Its claims are structurally narrow but strategically significant within the targeted disease area.
  • The patent sits within a highly crowded landscape, with overlapping patents that may impact freedom to operate.
  • Legal challenges and patent expirations could influence commercialization strategies.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent filings and litigations is essential for stakeholders aiming to develop competing therapeutics or formulations.

References

[1] US Patent No. 8,535,717, issued September 17, 2013.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Scope Database.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO) Patentscope, 2022.
[4] Patent Litigation Reports, http://www.patentlitigation.com, 2022.
[5] FDA Approved Drug Database, 2022.

Note: All information is based on publicly available patent documents, patent databases, and industry reports as of early 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,535,717

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Tripoint ELEPSIA XR levetiracetam TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 204417-001 Dec 20, 2018 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Tripoint ELEPSIA XR levetiracetam TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 204417-002 Dec 20, 2018 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,535,717

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
India196/MUM/2005Feb 22, 2005

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.