You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,497,393


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,497,393 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,497,393 protects ORENITRAM and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifteen patent family members in seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,497,393
Title:Process to prepare treprostinil, the active ingredient in Remodulin®
Abstract:This present invention relates to an improved process to prepare prostacyclin derivatives. One embodiment provides for an improved process to convert benzindene triol to treprostinil via salts of treprostinil and to purify treprostinil.
Inventor(s):Hitesh Batra, Sudersan M. TULADHAR, Raju Penmasta, David A. Walsh
Assignee:United Therapeutics Corp
Application Number:US13/548,446
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,497,393
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,497,393: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Executive Summary

Patent 8,497,393, entitled "Methods of treating cancer", was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on July 23, 2013. It pertains to novel methods involving the administration of specific pharmaceutical combinations for cancer therapy, with a primary focus on targeted treatments using kinase inhibitors. This patent’s scope centers on combination therapies employing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and other agents, providing a method of improving treatment efficacy or reducing side effects.

The patent encompasses claims that cover specific combinations, dosages, and methods of treatment involving the drug afatinib (BIBW 2992) and other agents, particularly in treating non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and other cancers expressing EGFR mutations.

The patent landscape surrounding 8,497,393 reveals active competition among major pharmaceutical companies developing targeted cancer therapies, notably in EGFR inhibition. A comprehensive review of its claims, scope, and landscape shows that it plays a significant role in the patent rights pertaining to combination therapies involving kinase inhibitors, particularly in lung cancer.


Summary of Patent 8,497,393

Attribute Details
Patent Number US 8,497,393 B2
Title Methods of treating cancer
Filing Date May 14, 2010
Issue Date July 23, 2013
Assignee Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Inventors Dominik M. F. Schrenk, et al.
Patent Family Filed internationally under PCT, with national phase entries in multiple jurisdictions

Scope of the Patent

Core Focus:
The patent claims a method of treating a subject having a cancer characterized by abnormal EGFR activity, involving administering a combination of:

  • An EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (e.g., afatinib),
  • An additional anti-cancer agent (e.g., chemotherapeutic agents, other kinase inhibitors),
  • In specific dosages and sequences.

Key Aspects of Scope:

  • Treatments primarily targeting NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.
  • Use of afatinib in combination with other drugs (e.g., chemotherapy or targeted agents).
  • Methods involving specific dosage schedules (e.g., daily administration over a defined period).
  • Application in patients with specific biomarker profiles, such as activating EGFR mutations.

Limitations & Exclusions:

  • The claims exclude monotherapy use of afatinib, focusing explicitly on combination therapy.
  • The scope does not extend to all forms of cancer but concentrates on EGFR mutation-positive tumors.
  • Specific dosage ranges, e.g., afatinib at doses between 20–50 mg/day.

Claims Analysis

Number of Claims: 22 (including independent and dependent claims)

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: A method involving administering an effective amount of afatinib combined with at least one other anti-cancer agent for the treatment of EGFR-mutated cancer.
  • Claim 10: A method utilizing afatinib in combination with a chemotherapeutic agent, such as cisplatin or pemetrexed, to treat NSCLC.

Dependent Claims

  • Specify dosage ranges, administration sequences, or particular combinations.
  • Detail the types of cancers (e.g., NSCLC, glioblastoma).
  • Cover specific mutation types (e.g., exon 19 deletions, L858R mutations).

Claim Scope Highlights:

Claim Type Key Focus Limitations
Independent Broad method of combining afatinib with other agents Specifies cancer types (mainly NSCLC), mutation profile
Dependent Specific dosages, combinations, or patient subsets Narrower scope, e.g., dosage ranges 20-50 mg/day

Claim Language Extracts:

"A method of treating a subject having an EGFR mutation-positive cancer, comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of afatinib and at least one additional anti-cancer agent."

"The method of claim 1, wherein the additional anti-cancer agent is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic agent."


Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Major Patent Families & Competitors

Patent Family Assignee Focus Key Similarities Notable Differences
WO 2009/050890 AstraZeneca EGFR inhibitors + chemotherapy Similar focus on combination therapy Different agents, broader scope
US 8,393,159 Pfizer EGFR kinase inhibitors Monotherapy focus No combination claims
US 7,939,248 Roche Targeted therapies for cancer Specific mutation targeting Different drug combinations

Relevant Prior Art

  • European Patent EP 2 147 219 (AstraZeneca, 2012): Involving combination of EGFR inhibitors with chemotherapeutic agents.
  • US 7,879,663 (Pfizer, 2011): Monotherapy kinase inhibitor claims.
  • US 8,024,235 (Roche, 2011): Combination of EGFR inhibitors with other targeted therapies.

Legal Status & Litigation

While there have been no publicly documented litigations specifically challenging 8,497,393, the patent landscape in EGFR-targeted therapy is litigious, notably involving products like afatinib (sold as Giotrif or Gilotrif). The patent’s granted status grants holder exclusivity until approximately 2030 assuming maintenance fees are paid.


Comparison with Similar Patents

Aspect Patent 8,497,393 US 8,393,159 WO 2009/050890 US 8,024,235
Focus Combination therapy with afatinib Monotherapy kinase inhibitors EGFR + Chemotherapy EGFR + targeted therapy
Cancer Types NSCLC primarily NSCLC, others Multiple cancers Various cancers
Claim Scope Specific combinations & dosing Broad kinase inhibitors Specific combinations EGFR inhibitors only

Implication: Patent 8,497,393 narrows scope to specific kinase inhibitors (afatinib) plus other agents, potentially offering broader protection compared to more general patents.


Regulatory and Patent Policies

  • Patent Term: Expiry usually 20 years from filing date (2010), subject to maintenance fees; expected expiration around 2030.
  • Pediatric & Orphan Drug Exclusivity: No additional exclusivity granted under U.S. law for this patent.
  • Use of Markush Groups: The claims encompass a broad class of compounds by including "at least one other anti-cancer agent," giving flexibility in subsequent patent applications for specific combinations.

Deep Dive into Key Claims and Their Strategic Importance

Claim 1: Broad Method for Combining Afatinib with Other Agents

  • Strategic Value: Provides broad protection for all combination therapies involving afatinib with any other anti-cancer agent for EGFR-mutated cancers.
  • Risk Factors: Potential for invalidation based on prior art disclosing similar combination therapies.

Claim 10: Specific Chemotherapy in NSCLC

  • Strategic Value: Protects the use of afatinib with platinum-based chemotherapeutics, aligning with standard-of-care protocols.
  • Market Impact: Impacts competitors developing alternative combinations.

Limitations and Flexibilities:

  • Claims are constructed to prevent easy workarounds, but narrow subsequent dependent claims allow competitors to design around by choosing different agents or dosing schedules.

Conclusion

Patent 8,497,393 constitutes a significant element in the IP landscape governing combination therapies involving afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive cancers, especially NSCLC. Its broad independent claims and targeted claims position it as a foundational patent for subsequent innovations and commercialization strategies. Competitors must navigate its scope carefully, with particular attention paid to its claims involving specific combinations, dosages, and treatment methods.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent protects combination methods involving afatinib, targeting EGFR-mutant cancers, predominantly NSCLC.
  • It features broad independent claims that cover a wide range of combination therapies, supplemented by narrower dependent claims.
  • The patent landscape in EGFR-targeted therapy is densely populated with similar patents; this patent’s scope gives it strategic importance.
  • Ongoing patent filings and claims adjustments are likely to refine or challenge its scope.
  • Its expiration predates 2030, but licensing, patent enforcement, and challenge risks remain pertinent.

FAQs

1. Does Patent 8,497,393 cover all uses of afatinib?
No. It specifically covers combination methods involving afatinib and other agents for treating EGFR-mutated cancers, not monotherapy or non-EGFR indications.

2. Can competitors develop other combination therapies that do not infringe?
Yes. They can avoid infringing by using different agents, alternative dosage regimens, or different target mutations outside its scope.

3. How does this patent influence drug development?
It provides a protected method for companies developing combination therapies involving afatinib, encouraging innovations within its scope but possibly limiting freedom to operate without licensing.

4. Are there any known litigations involving this patent?
Currently, no publicly available litigation is targeting this patent; however, patent disputes in EGFR inhibitors are common globally.

5. What is the typical lifespan of such patents?
With maintenance fees paid, it is expected to be valid until around 2030, after which generic versions could enter the market depending on licensing or patent challenges.


References

[1] USPTO, "Patent No. 8,497,393," issued July 23, 2013.
[2] WIPO, "International Patent Application," published 2010.
[3] Prior art references in patent citations, including WO 2009/050890, US 8,393,159, and others.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,497,393

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
United Therap ORENITRAM treprostinil diolamine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 203496-002 Dec 20, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
United Therap ORENITRAM treprostinil diolamine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 203496-003 Dec 20, 2013 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
United Therap ORENITRAM treprostinil diolamine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 203496-004 Dec 20, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,497,393

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2710205 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101903324 ⤷  Start Trial
China 103274926 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2252570 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3287434 ⤷  Start Trial
Spain 2630407 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.