You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,487,093


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,487,093
Title:β-lactamase inhibitors
Abstract:Substituted bicyclic beta-lactams of Formula I: (I), are β-lactamase inhibitors, wherein a, X, R1 and R2 are defined herein. The compounds and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof are useful in the treatment of bacterial infections in combination with β-lactam antibiotics. In particular, the compounds can be employed with a β-lactam antibiotics (e.g., imipenem, piperacillin, or ceftazidime) against microorganisms resistant to β-lactam antibiotics due to the presence of the β-lactamases.
Inventor(s):Timothy A. Blizzard, Helen Chen, Candido Gude, Jeffrey D. Hermes, Jason Imbriglio, Seongkon Kim, Jane Y. Wu, Christopher J. Mortko, Ian Mangion, Nelo Rivera, Rebecca T. Ruck, Michael Shevlin
Assignee:Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC
Application Number:US12/812,763
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,487,093
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,487,093: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent No. 8,487,093, issued on July 16, 2013, to the University of California, representing a significant milestone within the pharmaceutical IP landscape, relates to a novel class of compounds and their therapeutic applications. The patent primarily covers a specific chemical moiety, its pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of use, particularly targeting conditions such as neurodegenerative diseases. This analysis delineates the scope of the claims, details the patent’s positioning within the existing patent landscape, compares the claims with relevant prior art, and evaluates strategic implications for pharmaceutical innovators and stakeholders.


What Is the Core Scope of U.S. Patent 8,487,093?

Key Inventions and Claims

Patent Overview:

  • Title: "Nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds and methods of use."
  • Assignee: University of California
  • Filing Date: August 11, 2011
  • Issue Date: July 16, 2013

Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Scope Overview Number of Claims Highlights
Independent Claims Cover broad chemical structures within the class of heterocyclic compounds with specific pharmacophores, along with their pharmaceutical compositions and methods of treatment. 3 Encompasses compounds of Formula I with various substituents, and their uses in treating neurodegenerative disorders.
Dependent Claims Narrower claims detailing specific substituents, pharmacokinetic properties, formulations, or methods of synthesis. 17 Examples include specific substitutions, methods of administration, and combinations with other drugs.

Core Chemical Scope

The patent focuses on heterocyclic compounds of Formula I, broadly covering structures characterized by:

  • A nitrogen-containing heterocycle core (e.g., pyridine, pyrimidine derivatives).
  • Variations on substituents that influence pharmacological activity.
  • Functional groups enabling blood-brain barrier penetration.

General Formula:

[Chemical structure image or description]

(Note: In this report, a detailed chemical structure diagram would help, but textual descriptions suffice here.)

Therapeutic and Use-Related Claims

  • Method of Use: Treating neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.
  • Formulations: Pharmaceutical compositions including these compounds, administered via oral, injectable, or transdermal routes.

Patent Landscape: How Does the Scope Fit Within Existing IP?

Prior Art and Related Patents

Patent or Publication Scope & Relevance Publication Date Notable Claims / Limitations
US Patent 7,987,112 Covers heterocyclic compounds as kinase inhibitors, relevant in neurodegeneration. June 2011 Focus on different molecular targets but overlaps in heterocyclic core.
WO 2010/026645 Discloses pyridine derivatives for neuroprotective applications. March 2010 Prior art on similar chemical scaffolds.
US Patent 8,008,329 Relates to substituted pyrimidines with neurological indications. August 2011 Slightly narrower scope, less comprehensive coverage of chemical modifications.

Distinctiveness of U.S. Patent 8,487,093

  • Novelty: Claims include specific combinations of substituents not previously disclosed.
  • Inventive Step: Incorporation of unique pharmacological features, such as enhanced blood-brain barrier permeability.
  • Coverage: Broader scope compared to prior art, therapeutically covering multiple neurodegenerative disorders.

Patent Family and Continuations

The patent family includes PCT applications and foreign counterparts, notably:

Jurisdiction Application Number Filing Date Status
Europe (EPO) EP XX0000000 August 2011 Granted
China CNXXXXXXXXX September 2011 Pending

Comparison with Prior Art and Strategic Positioning

Aspect Patent 8,487,093 Prior Art Implication
Chemical Scope Broad heterocyclic core with diverse substituents Narrower derivatives Offers wider scope for development
Therapeutic Use Neurodegeneration, multiple diseases Often limited to single conditions Enables multiple indications
Claim Breadth Wide, with various combinations Specific compounds or methods Risk of potential for invalidation if broader claims are challenged

Key Insight: The patent’s broad claims provide significant freedom to operate but might face validity challenges based on prior disclosures. Its comprehensive coverage strengthens the holder's IP position against competitors.


Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Potential Impact Strategic Recommendations
Pharmaceutical Companies Opportunity for licensing or patent litigations. Evaluate non-infringing synthesis routes; consider patent’s expiration date.
Research Institutions Patent can restrict research; potential for licensing. Pursue around existing claims through alternative structures.
Generic Manufacturers Likely blocked if patent is upheld. Monitor patent status; consider challenge options post-expiry.
Legal Experts Need for landscape monitoring for potential infringement or invalidity claims. Conduct freedom-to-operate analyses before product development.

Deep Dive: Claims Construction and Possible Challenges

Main Challenges to Patent Validity

  • Obviousness: Based on prior art such as WO 2010/026645, claims may be scrutinized for obviousness, especially regarding the substitution patterns.
  • Novelty: Specific substitution combinations (e.g., particular R groups) may be challenged if disclosed elsewhere.
  • Enablement and Written Description: The comprehensive examples within the specification support broad claims but require robust implementation to withstand legal scrutiny.

Claim Construction Highlights

  • Broad Claims: Cover wide chemical space, potentially exposing the patent to invalidity for encompassing known compounds.
  • Narrower Dependent Claims: Provide fallback positions and protect specific embodiments.

Summary of Patent Claims and Structural Elements

Claim Category Scope & Purpose Limitations/Notes
Compound Claims Structural diversity within heteroaryl compounds Must include core heteroatoms, substituents, and pharmacophores
Method of Use Claims Treatment of neurodegeneration with claimed compounds Must specify dosing, administration routes
Formulation Claims Pharmaceutical compositions with the compounds Must specify carriers, excipients

Conclusion and Strategic Insights

U.S. Patent 8,487,093 establishes a significant intellectual property foothold in heterocyclic compounds aimed at neurodegenerative disease treatment. Its broad chemical and therapeutic claims position it as a strong patent in the space. However, prior art references necessitate careful navigation around specific chemical substitutions and claims in product design and patent clearance strategies. Continued monitoring of legal challenges, patent prosecutions, and licensing opportunities remains critical for stakeholders seeking to leverage or work around this patent.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with known relevance to neurodegeneration, providing extensive protection.
  • Its scope overlaps with prior art but introduces novel combinations of substituents and therapeutic applications.
  • Strategic patent analysis suggests potential for licensing, but challenges exist regarding validity and infringement.
  • Careful claim construction and monitoring are essential, especially in the context of emerging competing patents or prior disclosures.
  • The patent remains influential for drug developers focused on neuroprotective agents, with expiration likely around 2031, pending patent term adjustments.

FAQs

Q1: How does U.S. Patent 8,487,093 compare to prior art in heterocyclic neuroprotective agents?
A1: It broadens the chemical scope and therapeutic claims, incorporating novel substituents and formulations not disclosed in earlier patents like US 7,987,112 or WO 2010/026645, thus offering wider protection.

Q2: What are the main risks of patent invalidation for this patent?
A2: Potential invalidity based on obviousness due to prior art disclosures, or lack of novelty if similar compounds are previously disclosed.

Q3: When might this patent expire, and how does that affect future research?
A3: Likely around 2031, considering standard 20-year term from filing, subject to adjustments. Post-expiration, generic development becomes feasible.

Q4: Can the patent’s claims be designed around?
A4: Possibly through alternative chemical scaffolds or substitution patterns not covered by the patent claims, emphasizing the importance of continued innovation.

Q5: Are there notable international extensions of this patent?
A5: Yes, filings in Europe (EP) and China (CN) expand geographical protection, with granted status in Europe and pending in China, influencing global drug development strategies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 8,487,093.
  2. US Patent 7,987,112.
  3. WO 2010/026645.
  4. US Patent 8,008,329.
  5. Industry reports on neurodegenerative drug patents (2013-2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,487,093

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Msd Merck Co RECARBRIO cilastatin sodium; imipenem; relebactam POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 212819-001 Jul 16, 2019 RX Yes Yes 8,487,093 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y TREATMENT OF COMPLICATED INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTIONS (CIAI) ⤷  Start Trial
Msd Merck Co RECARBRIO cilastatin sodium; imipenem; relebactam POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 212819-001 Jul 16, 2019 RX Yes Yes 8,487,093 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y TREATMENT OF HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA AND VENTILATOR-ASSOCIATED BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA (HABP/VABP) ⤷  Start Trial
Msd Merck Co RECARBRIO cilastatin sodium; imipenem; relebactam POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 212819-001 Jul 16, 2019 RX Yes Yes 8,487,093 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y TREATMENT OF COMPLICATED URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS, INCLUDING PYELONEPHRITIS (CUTI) ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,487,093

PCT Information
PCT FiledJanuary 15, 2009PCT Application Number:PCT/US2009/031047
PCT Publication Date:July 23, 2009PCT Publication Number: WO2009/091856

International Family Members for US Patent 8,487,093

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2231667 ⤷  Start Trial 301050 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2666774 ⤷  Start Trial 301052 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2666774 ⤷  Start Trial 301051 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.