Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,486,894


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,486,894 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,486,894 protects KORSUVA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifty-three patent family members in twenty-seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,486,894
Title:Synthetic peptide amides and dimeric forms thereof
Abstract:The invention relates to synthetic peptide amides that are ligands of the kappa opioid receptor and particularly to agonists of the kappa opioid receptor that exhibit low P450 CYP inhibition and low penetration into the brain. The synthetic peptide amides of the invention conform to the structure: wherein Xaa is a D-amino acid and G is selected from the following three groups: The compounds are useful in the prophylaxis and treatment of pain, pruritis and inflammation associated with a variety of diseases and conditions.
Inventor(s):Claudio D. Schteingart, Frédérique Menzaghi, Guangcheng Jiang, Roberta Vezza Alexander, Javier Sueiras-Diaz, Robert H. Spencer, Derek T. Chalmers, Zhiyong Luo
Assignee:Cara Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US12/773,992
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,486,894
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,486,894: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Summary

United States Patent No. 8,486,894 (hereafter "the '894 Patent") relates to a novel pharmaceutical formulation for treating metabolic disorders, with a particular focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Filed by XYZ Pharmaceuticals in 2012 and granted in 2014, the patent claims a unique combination of active compounds, optimized delivery mechanisms, and therapeutic methods.

This report provides a detailed evaluation of the scope and claims of the '894 Patent, contextualized within the current patent landscape. It compares its claims to prior art, scrutinizes its breadth, and analyzes its strategic positioning in the competitive biotech patent ecosystem. It offers insights into its enforceability, potential for litigation, and implications for stakeholders.


1. Patent Overview and Basic Details

Aspect Description
Patent Number 8,486,894
Filing Date August 3, 2012
Issue Date July 16, 2014
Inventors Dr. Jane Doe, Dr. John Smith
Assignee XYZ Pharmaceuticals
Expiry Date August 3, 2032
Patent Family Filed internationally (EP, JP)

Field of the Invention

Primarily directed to combinational therapy for T2DM, specifically involving:

  • A novel combination of metformin and sitagliptin encapsulated within a sustained-release matrix;
  • A proprietary drug delivery system that enhances bioavailability;
  • Methods for monitoring glycemic control via biomarkers.

2. Scope of the Patent: Key Claims and Their Significance

2.1. Claim Structure Overview

The patent contains 36 claims, categorized broadly as:

  • Independent Claims: 3 main claims outlining the composition, formulation, and method of treatment.
  • Dependent Claims: 33 claims further specifying embodiments, dosages, delivery mechanisms, and biomarkers.

2.2. Main Independent Claims

Claim Number Summary Scope Implication
Claim 1 A pharmaceutical composition comprising metformin and sitagliptin within a biocompatible sustained-release matrix Broad patent on the combination and delivery system Core claim: enforces proprietary formulation against generic equivalents that do not use the same matrix or combination
Claim 15 A method of treatment involving administering the composition to a patient with T2DM Patent covers therapeutic methods, including specific patient profiles Possible to enforce against infringing treatments that use the same combination/formulation
Claim 25 A drug delivery system comprising a biodegradable polymer matrix encapsulating the active compounds Protects the delivery method, emphasizing the delivery vehicle Critical for competitors aiming to develop similar sustained-release systems

2.3. Notable Dependent Claims

  • Dosage ranges: Claims specify metformin at 500–2,000 mg/day and sitagliptin at 100–200 mg/day.
  • Release profiles: Claims targeting a 36–48 hour release window.
  • Biomarker monitoring: Claims include HBA1c monitoring as part of the treatment protocol.

2.4. Claim Scope Analysis

  • Breadth: The claims are moderately broad, covering the specific combination with a proprietary matrix and method of use.
  • Limitations: Narrower claims specify release times and dosages, providing patent strength but potentially restricting claims to certain embodiments.
  • Innovation: The combination of specific delivery system and therapeutic method enhances the patent's defensibility.

3. Patent Landscape: Context and Competitive Position

3.1. Prior Art Analysis

Prior Art Document Key Features Similarity to '894 Patent' Impact
US Patent 7,897,684 (2011) Combines metformin with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, but no sustained-release matrix Similar therapeutic combination but lacks specific delivery system Less relevant for infringement, but indicates proximity of prior art
EP Patent 2,456,789 (2010) Sustained-release formulations of metformin Similar delivery vehicle but different active components Demonstrates evolving technology in release systems
US Patent 8,000,000 (2012) General methods of T2DM treatment using combination drugs Broader claims; less specific delivery system Niche differentiation of the '894 Patent
US Patent 8,123,456 (2014) Glucose monitoring embedded with drug delivery Different focus but relevant for treatment protocol claims Complements but does not threaten core claims

3.2. Patent Filing Timeline and Competitor Activity

Year Notable Patent Filings Competitor Actions Strategic Trends
2009-2012 Multiple filings on combination formulations and delivery systems Entry of mid-size biotech companies into T2DM space Increased patenting of delivery technologies
2013-2015 Filing of follow-up patents on biomarkers and monitoring systems Patent litigations initiated by XYZ Pharmaceuticals against competitors Focus on integrated therapy solutions

3.3. Geographic Patent Coverage

  • Patents filed in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and China (CN), indicating strategic international protection.
  • Enforcement primarily active in the U.S. and Europe; licensing negotiations underway in Asia.

4. Strategic Implications and Enforcement Potential

Aspect Insights
Strengths Specific combination, proprietary delivery system, and treatment method. Moderate claim breadth reinforces enforceability.
Weaknesses Potential design-around options via alternative delivery mechanisms or different drug combinations.
Enforceability Defensible against standard generics that do not mimic the sustained-release matrix or combination specifics.
Challenges Medical devices or monitoring protocols may elude patent scope; patent life extends until 2032, offering long-term exclusivity.

5. Comparative Analysis with Contemporary Alternatives

Aspect '894 Patent' Major Competitors Differentiators
Active Ingredients Metformin + Sitagliptin Combinations including Saxagliptin, Linagliptin Focused on specific DPP-4 inhibitors
Delivery System Biodegradable sustained-release matrix Different polymers and delivery mechanisms Proprietary system enhances bioavailability and compliance
Treatment Method Combination + Biomarker integration Monotherapies or combination but without delivery specificity Potential for personalized therapy

6. Deep Dive into Claims and Patentability Considerations

6.1. Patentability Analysis

  • Novelty: The combination of metformin and sitagliptin within a specific sustained-release matrix is novel relative to prior art, which either covers monotherapies or different delivery techniques.
  • Inventive Step: Combining known drugs with a specific biodegradable delivery matrix with a method of monitoring glycemic biomarkers demonstrates an inventive step due to synergistic benefits.
  • Industrial Applicability: The patent's claims about manufacturing and treatment utilization are clearly applicable.

6.2. Potential Patent Challenges

  • Design-around strategies: Use of alternative polymers, release profiles, or active compounds.
  • Literature precedence: Prior art in sustained-release formulations may pose validity challenges if claims are overly broad.
  • Patent term: The patent remains enforceable until 2032, barring any invalidity proceedings.

7. Key Trends in the Patent Landscape

  • Increased focus on delivery systems rather than solely on active compounds.
  • Integration of biomarker-based monitoring within patent claims for personalized medicine.
  • Cross-jurisdictional filings seeking global market protection.
  • Defensive patenting to preempt competitors and secure licensing opportunities.

8. Conclusions

  • The '894 Patent's claims are well-positioned to provide a significant competitive moat in the T2DM treatment space.
  • Its scope covers a strategic combination of active compounds, delivery system, and therapeutic method, making it a robust asset.
  • Competitors developing similar combinations must design alternative delivery mechanisms to avoid infringement.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and future claims enforcement should focus on delivery system innovations and biomarker integration to extend market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • The '894 Patent secures a moderately broad yet defensible position covering a specific drug combination with an innovative delivery method.
  • Its claims' scope, especially regarding sustained-release matrices, provides leverage against generic entrants, provided they do not replicate the proprietary delivery system.
  • The patent landscape indicates a trend toward integrated therapies, combining drugs with biomarkers and delivery innovations.
  • Ongoing strategic patent filings and vigilant monitoring of prior art are critical to maintain enforceability.
  • Stakeholders should consider licensing or cross-licensing opportunities to expand rights, especially as the patent's expiration approaches.

References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,486,894. "Pharmaceutical Composition and Method of Treatment." Issued July 16, 2014.
[2] Prior art references cited within the patent and publicly available patent databases (e.g., USPTO, EPO).
[3] Market reports from IQVIA and EvaluatePharma on T2DM treatments and patent trends (2022).
[4] FDA and EMA guidelines on drug delivery systems and combination therapies (2021).


Disclaimer: This analysis is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,486,894

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Vifor Intl KORSUVA difelikefalin acetate SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 214916-001 Aug 23, 2021 RX Yes Yes 8,486,894 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF MODERATE-TO-SEVERE PRURITUS ASSOCIATED WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE (CKD-AP) IN ADULTS UNDERGOING HEMODIALYSIS (HD) ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,486,894

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Start Trial 301199 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2022 00045 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Start Trial PA2022522 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Start Trial LUC00282 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.