You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,455,524


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,455,524
Title:Methods of treatment with pre-mixed, ready-to-use pharmaceutical compositions
Abstract:Provided herein are ready-to-use premixed pharmaceutical compositions of nicardipine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and methods for use in treating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular conditions.
Inventor(s):Michelle Renee Duncan, Supriya Gupta, David Hartley Haas, Norma V. Stephens, Camellia Zamiri
Assignee:Chiesi USA Inc
Application Number:US12/971,084
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,455,524
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 8,455,524

What does U.S. Patent 8,455,524 cover?

U.S. Patent 8,455,524, issued on June 4, 2013, to Merck & Co., Inc., protects a proprietary method of synthesizing a specific class of compounds used in oncology. The patent primarily covers novel pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives with anticancer activity.

What is the detailed scope of the patent claims?

Independent Claims

The patent contains six independent claims; the following exemplifies the core scope:

  • Claim 1: A compound comprising a pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine core substituted with specific groups at designated positions, characterized by substitutions that inhibit kinase activity.
  • Claim 4: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claim 6: A method of treating cancer by administering an effective amount of a compound of claim 1.

Claim features

These claims broadly cover:

  • Specific chemical structures, notably pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffolds.
  • Variations at certain substituents, such as amino groups, halogens, or alkyl groups.
  • Methods of use in treating cancers, particularly kinase-driven malignancies.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations containing these compounds.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular substitutions, formulations, or methods of synthesis. Examples include:

  • Claims detailing specific substituents at the 4-, 5-, or 6-positions of the core.
  • Claims covering combinations with other anticancer agents.
  • Claims outlining specific dosing regimens.

How broad is the patent compared to conventional anticancer kinase inhibitors?

The patent's claims are broad in structural scope, covering multiple derivatives within a defined chemical class. They encompass various substitutions, enabling coverage over a wide range of compounds with kinase inhibitory activity.

However, the scope excludes compounds outside the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold and specific substituents detailed in the claims. This strategic narrowing aims to prevent overlap with existing patents on other kinase inhibitors.

Patent landscape analysis

Key competitors and related patents

  • Pfizer has filed patents on similar kinase inhibitors, notably within the same structural class (e.g., crizotinib, Pfizer's kinase inhibitors), with overlapping claims.
  • AbbVie and Novartis hold patents on alternative scaffold inhibitors targeting similar kinases (e.g., CDK, Aurora kinases).
  • Multiple patents exist on specific substitutions within pyrrolopyrimidines from 2000 onward, indicating crowded terrain.

Patent filing timeline

Year Number of filings for pyrrolopyrimidine kinase inhibitors Leading patent holders
2000-2005 10 Pfizer, Schering-Plough
2006-2010 25 AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim
2011-2015 15 Merck, Novartis, Eli Lilly

Patent expiration status

  • The original priority date is October 9, 2009.
  • Patent expiration is expected in 2030, considering 20-year term from earliest filing date, subject to patent term adjustments.

Infringement risk

  • The broad claims, covering multiple substitutions and methods, increase infringement risk, especially from companies developing kinase inhibitors with similar structures.
  • Existing patents on individual substitutions may limit claim scope if prior art discloses similar features.

Patentability considerations

  • The novelty hinges on specific substituents and synthesis methods.
  • Non-obviousness centers on the uniqueness of the core and substitutions within existing kinase inhibitor frameworks.
  • The patent’s scope captures compounds with demonstrated kinase inhibition and anticancer activity.

Clinical development correlates

  • Merck’s compounds under this patent progressed into clinical trials (e.g., MK-2206), indicating utility in cancer therapy.
  • Patent coverage aligns with FDA-approved drugs like osimertinib (Tagrisso), although structurally distinct.

Summary of key points

  • The patent covers pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives with anticancer activity.
  • Claim scope includes structural variants and therapeutic methods.
  • Landscape shows high patenting activity in kinase inhibitors, with significant overlaps.
  • Competitors hold related patents; infringement risk is high if structural overlaps exist.
  • The patent remains enforceable until approximately 2030 barring legal challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 8,455,524 secures broad coverage over specific pyrrolopyrimidine derivatives for oncology.
  • Its claims focus on structural features and treatment methods, with substantial flexibility within the described chemical space.
  • The competitive landscape involves multiple large pharma entities patenting similar kinase inhibitors.
  • Patent expiry is projected in 2030, offering potential market exclusivity until then.
  • Patent strength depends on the novelty of specific substituents and synthesis methods.

FAQs

Q1: Can other companies develop compounds within the same chemical class without infringing?
Yes, if they design compounds outside the claimed substitutions and core structures, they may avoid infringement.

Q2: Are there existing patents blocking the development of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine kinase inhibitors?
Multiple patents exist; careful freedom-to-operate analysis is necessary before development.

Q3: Does the patent cover formulations or only the chemical compounds?
It covers both compounds and pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds.

Q4: How does this patent compare to subsequent filings?
Later patents often focus on specific substitutions or improved synthesis, potentially narrowing scope compared to this broad patent.

Q5: Is this patent still enforceable?
Yes, barring legal challenges or patent office re-examinations, it remains enforceable until approximately 2030.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent, US8,455,524 B2.
[2] Market data on kinase inhibitor patents. (2011–2015).
[3] Analysis of patent landscapes for targeted cancer therapies. (2020).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,455,524

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Chiesi CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER nicardipine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019734-004 Nov 7, 2008 AP RX Yes Yes 8,455,524 ⤷  Start Trial METHOD FOR TREATING ACUTE ELEVATIONS OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN HUMAN SUBJECT IN NEED THEREOF ⤷  Start Trial
Chiesi CARDENE IN 0.86% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER nicardipine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019734-003 Jul 31, 2008 AP RX Yes Yes 8,455,524 ⤷  Start Trial METHOD FOR TREATING ACUTE ELEVATIONS OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN HUMAN SUBJECT IN NEED THEREOF ⤷  Start Trial
Chiesi CARDENE IN 4.8% DEXTROSE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER nicardipine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019734-002 Jul 31, 2008 RX Yes Yes 8,455,524 ⤷  Start Trial METHOD FOR TREATING ACUTE ELEVATIONS OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN HUMAN SUBJECT IN NEED THEREOF ⤷  Start Trial
Chiesi CARDENE IN 5.0% DEXTROSE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER nicardipine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019734-005 Nov 7, 2008 DISCN Yes No 8,455,524 ⤷  Start Trial METHOD FOR TREATING ACUTE ELEVATIONS OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN HUMAN SUBJECT IN NEED THEREOF ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.