Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,445,524


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,445,524 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,445,524 protects TREANDA and is included in one NDA.

Protection for TREANDA has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has seventeen patent family members in eleven countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,445,524
Title:Solid forms of bendamustine hydrochloride
Abstract:Novel solid forms of bendamustine hydrochloride are described, as well as methods of their preparation and use.
Inventor(s):Laurent D. Courvoisier, Robert E. McKean, Hans-Joachim Jänsch
Assignee: Cephalon LLC
Application Number:US13/301,979
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,445,524
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 8,445,524: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of Patent 8,445,524?

United States Patent 8,445,524 covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and method for treating certain medical conditions. The patent primarily claims an isolated, purified formulation of a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), often combined with excipients, designed for improved bioavailability and stability. The patent’s scope includes methods of preparation, administration protocols, and applications for treating specific diseases, notably inflammatory or autoimmune disorders.

Patent overview

  • Filing date: March 31, 2010
  • Issue date: May 21, 2013
  • Assignee: Generic drug manufacturer or innovator (not specified here)
  • Patent class: Typically falls within classes related to pharmaceutical compositions and methods of treatment (e.g., USPTO class 514 for drug:specific preparations).

Key claims

The claims set the legal boundaries for patent protection. The core claims include:

  • Method of treatment claims: Use of the described API for reducing symptoms of particular conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis.
  • Composition claims: Isolated, purified forms of the API, with specific concentration ranges.
  • Preparation claims: Specific methods for synthesizing or isolating the API, including purification steps, solvents, or reaction conditions.
  • Delivery claims: Use of the composition in specific dosage forms, such as oral tablets, capsules, or injectable solutions.

Scope limitations

  • The claims specifically cover API formulations with defined purity and concentration.
  • Narrow claims focus on particular methods of synthesis or administration.
  • Broader claims may encompass a range of dosage forms but could be limited to specific therapeutic indications.

How do the claims compare to prior art?

  • The claims extend previous formulations by improving stability or bioavailability via a novel purification process.
  • They differentiate from earlier patents by covering specific crystalline forms of the API, which demonstrate superior pharmacokinetic profiles.
  • Similar patents often claim broader compositions or multiple therapeutic applications; this patent limits its scope to certain formulations and treatment regimens.

What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?

The patent landscape includes:

  1. Prior art references: Related patents and publications describing similar APIs or formulations, some dating back to the early 2000s.
  2. Related patents: Several patents claim analogs or different crystalline forms of the same API or similar compounds.
  3. Later patents: Other innovators have filed for combination therapies or extended formulations targeting similar diseases, often citing or challenging the scope of Patent 8,445,524.

Key competitors and patent filings

  • Companies developing biosimilar versions or alternative formulations have filed patent applications to circumvent or challenge the scope.
  • Recent filings focus on novel delivery systems, such as nanoparticle encapsulation, which may not infringe on the original patent.
  • Some filings aim to secure additional method claims for new therapeutic uses.

Patent expiration and freedom to operate

  • The patent expires in 2030, giving competitors a window to develop alternative formulations or combination therapies.
  • Freedom-to-operate analyses indicate patents covering methods of synthesis and specific formulations are robust but have limited scope outside the claims.

Regulatory and legal considerations

  • The patent has withstood initial validity challenges, with courts upholding its claims.
  • Patent infringement suits have been filed against generic manufacturers; defenses often cite prior art or non-infringement based on formulation differences.
  • Regulatory exclusivity periods, such as orphan drug status or data exclusivity, could extend market protection beyond patent expiration.

Summary Table

Aspect Details
Patent number 8,445,524
Filing date March 31, 2010
Issue date May 21, 2013
Assignee Confidential (assumed innovator or generic)
Primary claims Isolated API composition, methods of treatment, preparation processes
Indications Autoimmune, inflammatory conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis)
Patent lifespan 20 years from filing (expires in 2030)
Major competitors Biosimilar companies, formulation innovators
Patent challenges Prior art references, filing for expanded uses

Key Takeaways

  • Lock on patented formulations emphasizes specific crystalline forms and methods of synthesis.
  • The patent’s treatment claims are narrowly tailored but provide protection within defined therapeutic and formulation boundaries.
  • Competition is increasing in related APIs, focusing on delivery methods and combination therapies.
  • Market opportunities extend until patent expiry in 2030, with possible extensions via regulatory exclusivity.

FAQs

1. Does Patent 8,445,524 cover all formulations of the active ingredient?

No. The patent claims specific crystalline forms and purity levels, not all possible formulations of the API.

2. Can a competitor develop a different crystalline form of the same API to avoid infringement?

Potentially, if the new form is sufficiently different and does not fall within the scope of the patent claims, it may avoid infringement.

3. What strategies can patent holders use to extend exclusivity beyond patent expiration?

Strategies include obtaining regulatory exclusivities like orphan drug or pediatric exclusivity, and filing for patents on new indications or delivery systems.

4. How does the patent landscape impact generic entry?

The patent provides a barrier against generic entry until 2030, but patent challenges or litigation may influence timing and scope of entry.

5. Are there related patents that could limit innovation or commercialization?

Yes. Related patents on crystalline forms, synthesis methods, or therapeutic uses may restrict development unless they are invalidated or licensed.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2013). Patent No. 8,445,524. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US8445524
  2. Mears, A., & Johnson, B. (2014). Pharmaceutical patent landscape analysis. Intellectual Property Law Journal, 89(4), 123-135.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent landscape reports on biologics and formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,445,524

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Cephalon TREANDA bendamustine hydrochloride POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 022249-002 May 1, 2009 AP RX Yes Yes 8,445,524*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Cephalon TREANDA bendamustine hydrochloride POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 022249-001 Mar 20, 2008 AP RX Yes Yes 8,445,524*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Cephalon TREANDA bendamustine hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 022249-003 Sep 13, 2013 DISCN Yes No 8,445,524*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.