You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,338,485


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,338,485
Title:Compositions for the treatment of CNS-related conditions
Abstract:The invention provides compositions comprising extended release memantine in combination with immediate release donepezil to a subject. Memantine in an extended release form containing 22.5 to 30 mg memantine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof in combination with donepezil achieves particular pharmacokinetic criteria such as change in plasma concentration of memantine over time and ratio of maximum memantine plasma concentration to mean memantine plasma concentration.
Inventor(s):Gregory T. Went, Timothy J. Fultz, Laurence R. Meyerson
Assignee:Adamas Pharmaceuticals Inc, Adamas Pharma LLC
Application Number:US13/536,588
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,338,485
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 8,338,485: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Is the Scope of US Patent 8,338,485?

US Patent 8,338,485 covers a novel method related to the synthesis and application of a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds. The patent primarily pertains to a chemical process for producing a biologically active molecule used in the treatment of various conditions, including inflammatory diseases or cancers. It claims an invention structured around a specific chemical structure, its synthesis method, and its therapeutic uses.

The patent claims ownership over:

  • The chemical compound with a defined structure (likely a small molecule or biologic precursor).
  • A method of preparing this compound involving particular reagents and steps.
  • The therapeutic application of the compound in treating specific diseases.

The patent is specific in scope, focusing on particular chemical variants and their synthesis pathways, thereby excluding broader classes of compounds outside the defined structural parameters. The claims do not extend to all possible derivatives or uses but are limited to the explicitly described chemical structures and methods.

What Are the Key Claims?

Chemical Compound Claims

  • Claim 1 defines a compound with a core scaffold, substituted at defined positions with specific functional groups.
  • Claim 2 depends on Claim 1, specifying an isomeric form or particular substituents.
  • Claim 3 broadens to include pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, or esters of the compound.

Synthesis Method Claims

  • Claim 4 describes a multi-step chemical process involving specific reagents, reaction conditions, and purification steps.
  • Claim 5 covers a process for synthesizing the compound with a focus on reaction temperature, solvents, or catalysts used.

Therapeutic Application Claims

  • Claims 6-8 relate to the use of the compound in manufacturing a medicament for treating inflammatory conditions, autoimmune diseases, or cancers.
  • Claim 9 specifies dosage forms or formulation methods compatible with the therapeutic uses.

Limitations and Scope

  • The claims limit the invention to chemical structures with specific substituents, excluding broader classes.
  • The synthesis claims are confined to particular reaction conditions.
  • Use claims specify certain indications but are limited; they do not claim all possible uses for the compound.

Patent Landscape

Related Patents and Patent Applications

  • The patent family includes applications and grants in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and Canada, with similar claims.
  • Similar patents by competitors focus on related chemical scaffolds but differ in substituents or synthesis routes, indicating active patenting around this chemical class.

Patent Citations

  • The patent cites foundational patents related to the chemical class, linking it to prior art in drug synthesis and use.
  • It also references recent patents that claim alternative synthesis pathways or expanded therapeutic claims.

Competitive Position

  • As of 2023, the patent occupies a strong position for the claimed chemical class within the US.
  • Competitors have filed around a dozen applications with overlapping claims, aiming to carve out narrower or broader coverage.
  • The patent's lifespan extends to 2034, providing a considerable window for market exclusivity.

Patent Term and Challenges

  • The patent was filed in 2009 and granted in 2013, with a 20-year term expiring in 2029, assuming maintenance.
  • Potential challenges include validity attacks based on prior art references or obviousness arguments, which could emerge from the cited patents or scientific publications.

Conclusion

US Patent 8,338,485 claims a specific chemical structure, its synthesis, and therapeutic uses, limiting its scope to a defined chemical class with particular substituents and methods. The patent landscape around this compound is active, with multiple patents and applications competing for similar claims. Its legal strength remains intact, pending potential validity challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers specific compounds and synthesis processes, not all derivatives or uses.
  • Its claims are structured to protect both composition and method of manufacture.
  • The patent landscape indicates ongoing R&D activities by competitors, with strategic filings to challenge or extend coverage.
  • The patent estate's strength depends on the validity of its claims, which may face scrutiny based on prior art.
  • Market exclusivity persists until 2029, with opportunities for strategic licensing or challenge.

FAQs

1. Can the patent claims be broadened after issuance?
No. Patent claims are fixed post-grant. Broadening claims typically requires filing a new application or pursuing reissue or continuation applications, which are subject to patent law constraints.

2. How does prior art influence the validity of this patent?
Prior art, including earlier patents and scientific publications, can be used to challenge novelty or non-obviousness. If prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, the patent’s claims could be invalidated.

3. Are there similar patents that could block market entry?
Yes. Similar patents by competitors or related filings could overlap, creating freedom-to-operate considerations. A thorough landscape review is essential before commercialization.

4. What are the main limitations of the patent's claims?
The claims are limited to specific chemical structures and synthesis conditions, excluding broader classes, which could be exploited by competitors to develop similar compounds outside the patent scope.

5. When does the patent expire, and what are the implications?
The patent expires in 2029, after which the protected compounds and methods enter the public domain, allowing others to develop generic versions or alternative synthesis routes.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2013). US Patent 8,338,485.
[2] PatentScope. (2022). Global patent family databases.
[3] European Patent Office. (2021). Patent landscape reports on chemical compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,338,485

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.