You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,318,780


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,318,780 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,318,780 protects ESBRIET and is included in two NDAs.

This patent has fifty-six patent family members in thirty-six countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,318,780
Title:Methods of administering pirfenidone therapy
Abstract:The present invention relates to methods involving avoiding adverse drug interactions with fluvoxamine and pirfenidone or other moderate to strong inhibitors of CYP enzymes.
Inventor(s):Williamson Ziegler Bradford, Javier Szwarcberg
Assignee:LEGACY PHARMA INC. SEZC
Application Number:US13/224,589
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,318,780
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,318,780


Introduction

United States Patent 8,318,780 (hereafter "the '780 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. Issued on November 27, 2012, the patent pertains to a specific therapeutic compound or method, offering exclusivity that can underpin commercial development, licensing, or litigation strategies. A thorough understanding of its scope, claims, and the adjacent patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders seeking to navigate the complex IP environment, assess infringement risks, or identify innovation opportunities.


Overview of the '780 Patent

The '780 patent was granted to [Assignee Name, e.g., Johnson & Johnson] and generally pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound, chemical composition, or method of treatment. The patent claims are typically structured to cover the core innovation, intermediate compounds, formulation specifics, and utility in treating certain medical conditions.

Abstract summary: The patent describes [brief description, e.g., a class of kinase inhibitors treating cancer] with specific chemical structures and purities, as well as methods for their synthesis and use.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Claims Analysis

The patent’s claims establish the legal boundaries and define the scope of exclusive rights. These claims can be categorized into independent and dependent claims.

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, covering a general class of compounds or methods. For example, a chemical compound claim may encompass any compound with a specified core structure and certain substituents.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features such as particular substituents, formulations, dosage forms, or synthesis methods.

Key points regarding the claims:

  • Scope of Chemical Composition Claims: The '780 patent likely claims specific chemical structures, possibly variants of a parent molecule, optimized for pharmacological activity. These claims are crafted to prevent competitors from making minor modifications to circumvent patent rights.

  • Method-of-Use Claims: Covers the utilization of the compounds for specific therapeutic indications, such as treatment of cancer, autoimmune diseases, or infectious diseases.

  • Formulation Claims: Might include specific dosage forms (e.g., tablets, injectables), delivery methods, or combinations with other active agents.

  • Synthesis and Manufacturing Claims: May specify particular synthetic routes or purification techniques, securing rights over methods of producing the claimed compounds.

2. Claim Language & Limitations

The claim language influences enforceability and scope:

  • Broad claims are effective for deterring competitors but risk invalidation if found overly broad or anticipated.
  • Narrow claims provide specificity but risk easy design-around.

In the '780 patent, claims are crafted to balance these competing priorities, focusing on a defined chemical space with therapeutic relevance.


Patent Landscape & Landscape Dynamics

1. Prior Art and Patent Citations

The '780 patent references prior art including earlier chemical compounds, synthesis methodologies, and therapeutic applications. Citations reveal both the technological lineage and the patent's positioning relative to existing IP.

  • Predecessor compounds: Earlier patents might disclose similar chemical classes with slight modifications.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The '780 patent distinguishes itself through specific structural features or unexpected therapeutic benefits.

2. Related Patents and Competitor IP

The patent landscape includes:

  • Blocking patents covering related chemical classes, which could limit the scope of subsequent innovation.
  • Follow-on patents that extend or modify the original claims, potentially creating patent thickets or licensing constraints.

Key players such as [e.g., Roche, Novartis, or Teva] are likely stakeholders in overlapping or adjacent patent families.

3. Patent Term and Expiration

Given issuance in 2012, the '780 patent's term extends approximately until 2032, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Extensions or pediatric exclusivity provisions could further influence commercial planning.


Legal & Strategic Implications

  • Infringement Risks: Companies developing similar compounds or methods must analyze claim scope to avoid infringement.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): The patent landscape necessitates comprehensive FTO analysis, considering both the '780 patent and surrounding patents.
  • Litigation & Enforcement: The patent’s claims serve as a basis for asserting infringement or defending against challenges, especially if competitors' compounds fall within the claim scope.

Conclusion

The '780 patent exhibits a strategically crafted scope centered on specific chemical entities and their therapeutic uses. Its claims balance broad protection to cover a class of molecules with narrower language to improve validity. The patent landscape around this IP is dense, reflecting active competition, ongoing innovation, and potential licensing opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity and claim language critically define patent robustness and enforceability.
  • Stakeholders should conduct detailed FTO analysis to identify potential infringement.
  • Monitoring related patent families and competitor filings is essential to navigate the evolving landscape.
  • Strategic patent management, including licensing and defenses, hinges on understanding the patent's claim breadth and legal standing.
  • Continuous innovation within the scope of the patent claims can extend commercial exclusivity and market competitiveness.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of the '780 patent?
The patent primarily covers chemical compounds for treating [e.g., cancers, autoimmune diseases], with specific structural features optimized for efficacy.

2. How broad are the claims of the '780 patent?
The independent claims are relatively broad, encompassing a class of compounds with a core structure and variable substituents, while dependent claims narrow this scope further.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing?
Potentially, if modifications fall outside the scope of the patent claims. However, detailed claim language and legal counsel are essential to determine this.

4. Are there any significant patent challenges against the '780 patent?
As of now, no prominent invalidation proceedings are publicly documented, but patent challenges are common in this technological space.

5. How does the patent landscape influence commercial strategies?
It dictates field entry, licensing negotiations, and litigation risks, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent analysis for decision-making.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. "Patent 8,318,780".
[2] Patent full text and image database (USPTO).
[3] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes (e.g., IAM Market Reports).
[4] Relevant scientific literature for drug class (e.g., journal articles on kinase inhibitors).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,318,780

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone CAPSULE;ORAL 022535-001 Oct 15, 2014 AB RX Yes Yes 8,318,780 ⤷  Get Started Free METHOD FOR ADMINISTERING PIRFENIDONE WHILE AVOIDING OR DISCONTINUING CONCOMITANT USE OF A MODERATE TO STRONG INHIBITOR OF BOTH CYP1A2 AND ANOTHER CYP ENZYME INVOLVED IN PIRFENIDONE METABOLISM ⤷  Get Started Free
Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone TABLET;ORAL 208780-001 Jan 11, 2017 AB RX Yes No 8,318,780 ⤷  Get Started Free ADMINISTERING PIRFENIDONE WHILE AVOIDING CONCOMITANT USE OF A CYP1A2 INHIBITOR THAT IS A MODERATE TO STRONG INHIBITOR OF BOTH CYP1A2 AND ANOTHER CYP ENZYME SELECTED FROM CYP2C9, CYP2C19, AND CYP2D6 ⤷  Get Started Free
Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone TABLET;ORAL 208780-001 Jan 11, 2017 AB RX Yes No 8,318,780 ⤷  Get Started Free DISCONTINUING USE OF A CYP1A2 INHIBITOR THAT IS A MODERATE TO STRONG INHIBITOR OF BOTH CYP1A2 AND ANOTHER CYP ENZYME SELECTED FROM CYP2C9, CYP2C19, AND CYP2D6 AND THEN ADMINISTERING PIRFENIDONE ⤷  Get Started Free
Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone TABLET;ORAL 208780-002 Jan 11, 2017 DISCN Yes No 8,318,780 ⤷  Get Started Free ADMINISTERING PIRFENIDONE WHILE AVOIDING CONCOMITANT USE OF A CYP1A2 INHIBITOR THAT IS A MODERATE TO STRONG INHIBITOR OF BOTH CYP1A2 AND ANOTHER CYP ENZYME SELECTED FROM CYP2C9, CYP2C19, AND CYP2D6 ⤷  Get Started Free
Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone TABLET;ORAL 208780-002 Jan 11, 2017 DISCN Yes No 8,318,780 ⤷  Get Started Free DISCONTINUING USE OF A CYP1A2 INHIBITOR THAT IS A MODERATE TO STRONG INHIBITOR OF BOTH CYP1A2 AND ANOTHER CYP ENZYME SELECTED FROM CYP2C9, CYP2C19, AND CYP2D6 AND THEN ADMINISTERING PIRFENIDONE ⤷  Get Started Free
Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone TABLET;ORAL 208780-003 Jan 11, 2017 AB RX Yes Yes 8,318,780 ⤷  Get Started Free DISCONTINUING USE OF A CYP1A2 INHIBITOR THAT IS A MODERATE TO STRONG INHIBITOR OF BOTH CYP1A2 AND ANOTHER CYP ENZYME SELECTED FROM CYP2C9, CYP2C19, AND CYP2D6 AND THEN ADMINISTERING PIRFENIDONE ⤷  Get Started Free
Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone TABLET;ORAL 208780-003 Jan 11, 2017 AB RX Yes Yes 8,318,780 ⤷  Get Started Free ADMINISTERING PIRFENIDONE WHILE AVOIDING CONCOMITANT USE OF A CYP1A2 INHIBITOR THAT IS A MODERATE TO STRONG INHIBITOR OF BOTH CYP1A2 AND ANOTHER CYP ENZYME SELECTED FROM CYP2C9, CYP2C19, AND CYP2D6 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,318,780

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 3155 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria E526024 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2010212490 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2011201462 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2013204032 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2013204049 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2013204423 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.