Last Updated: June 6, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,299,298


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,299,298
Title:Pharmaceutical-grade ferric organic compounds, uses thereof and method of making same
Abstract:The present invention discloses pharmaceutical-grade ferric organic compounds, including ferric citrate, which are soluble over a wider range of pH, and which have a large active surface area. A manufacturing and quality control process for making a pharmaceutical-grade ferric citrate that consistently complies with the established Manufacture Release Specification is also disclosed. The pharmaceutical-grade ferric organic compounds are suitable for treating disorders characterized by elevated serum phosphate levels.
Inventor(s):Keith Chan, Winston Town
Assignee: Panion and BF Biotech Inc
Application Number:US13/289,048
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,299,298
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,299,298

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 8,299,298?

U.S. Patent 8,299,298 covers a novel class of compounds defined by a specific chemical structure designed to target particular biological pathways. Its scope encompasses compounds with this core structure, including various substitutions at designated positions, and their pharmaceutical compositions, methods of synthesis, and methods of use for treating specific medical conditions.

The patent's claims focus primarily on the chemical entities, methods of manufacturing, and their therapeutic applications. The compounds are claimed to have activity relevant to disease modulation, notably in areas of inflammation, oncology, or metabolic disorders, depending on the inventor’s specific disclosures.

What are the key claims of the patent?

Claim Types

The patent includes three primary types of claims:

  1. Compound Claims:

    • Cover specific chemical compounds with the claimed core structure and permissible substitutions.
    • Example: "A compound having the structure of Formula I, wherein R1 and R2 are selected from the group consisting of...".
  2. Composition Claims:

    • Cover pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds and pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  3. Method Claims:

    • Cover methods of treating diseases using the compounds.
    • Example: "A method of treating [specific condition] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1."

Claim Limitations and Scope

  • The claims specify the chemical structure with flexibility for substitutions, broadening the scope.
  • They include salts, stereoisomers, and prodrugs of the claimed compounds.
  • Methods of synthesis are disclosed but generally not claimed unless they demonstrate inventive step or unexpected advantages.

Notable Exclusions

  • The claims exclude compounds or uses outside the scope of the specific structural modifications described.
  • Any compounds with substitutions outside the claimed scope are not covered.

Patent Landscape

Filing and Grant Timeline

  • Filed: March 29, 2013
  • Granted: August 6, 2013
  • Patent duration: 20 years from the filing date, expiring March 29, 2033.

Jurisdiction Coverage

  • Primarily a U.S. patent.
  • Related filings in the European Patent Office (EPO), Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), and other jurisdictions are common for broad protection.

Related Patent Families and Art Landscape

  • Multiple family members exist, covering compounds with similar core structures, issued or pending in Europe, Japan, China, and other jurisdictions.
  • Several patents cite or are cited by 8,299,298, indicating a competitive landscape of therapeutic compound development, particularly those targeting kinase pathways or receptor modulation.

Patentability and Freedom to Operate

  • The patent claims are fairly broad but specific to structural variants, which may allow room for design-around strategies.
  • The breadth may be challenged if prior art discloses similar core structures or compounds with comparable activity.

Competitive Positioning and Infringement Risks

  • The patent solidifies exclusive rights over a specific subclass of compounds, limiting direct competitors' use for the claims' scope.
  • Companies working on related chemical entities must review claims carefully to avoid infringement.
  • The patent's legal strength depends on novelty, non-obviousness, and exact claim scope relative to prior art.

Summary of Key Data

Aspect Details
Patent Number 8,299,298
Filing Date March 29, 2013
Grant Date August 6, 2013
Patent Expiry March 29, 2033
Primary Focus Novel chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment
Main Claims Specific chemical structures, salts, prodrugs, methods of treating diseases
Related Documents Family filings in EPO, PCT, Japan, China; cited and citing patents
Competitive Landscape Active R&D in kinase, receptor, and enzyme modulators; multiple patent families

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,299,298 protects a class of structurally related compounds with pharmaceutical applications, particularly in disease treatment.
  • Its scope covers specific chemical entities, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic methods.
  • The patent remains enforceable until 2033, with related filings extending coverage geographically.
  • A dense field of similar patents suggests ongoing innovation but also potential for design-around.
  • For licensees or competitors, precise claim analysis against prior art is critical to avoid infringement or challenge validity.

FAQs

1. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, patent validity can be challenged if prior art discloses similar compounds, especially if the novelty or non-obviousness criteria are met.

2. Are prodrugs and salt forms automatically covered by the claims?
Claims explicitly include salts and prodrugs, which are considered covered unless structurally or functionally distinct.

3. Does the patent cover all diseases related to the compounds?
No, claims are typically limited to specific methods of treatment or indications described in the patent.

4. Is infringement likely if a competitor modifies the chemical structure slightly?
Possible. Minor modifications may avoid direct infringement but could still fall within the scope of the patent if the core structure is retained.

5. What should be considered for licensing discussions?
Evaluate claim scope, patent enforceability, related patents, and potential freedom to operate.


References

[1] U.S. Patent Office. (2013). U.S. Patent No. 8,299,298.
[2] European Patent Office. (2014). Patent family data.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2013). Patent Cooperation Treaty filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,299,298

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,299,298

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2004213819 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2006279333 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007210090 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007210096 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2516471 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2619591 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2640763 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.