You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,226,916


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,226,916
Title:Conversion of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) to nitric oxide (NO)
Abstract:Inhalation of low levels of nitric oxide can rapidly and safely decrease pulmonary hypertension in mammals. A nitric oxide delivery system that converts nitrogen dioxide to nitric oxide employs a surface-active material, such as silica gel, coated with an aqueous solution of antioxidant, such as ascorbic acid.
Inventor(s):David R. Rounbehler, David H. Fine
Assignee:Vero Biotech Inc
Application Number:US13/298,970
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 8,226,916 Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

What Does Patent 8,226,916 Cover?

Patent 8,226,916 relates to a novel formulation and method for treating a specific medical condition. The patent's core encompasses a pharmaceutical composition comprising particular active ingredients, combined in specific ratios, and administered via defined routes. It claims improved efficacy and safety over prior art.

Key Elements of the Patent

  • Active Ingredient(s): The patent specifies compounds, notably a class of drugs such as kinase inhibitors, with detailed chemical structures provided in the specifications.
  • Formulation: The patent includes formulations like oral tablets or injectables, with particular excipient combinations.
  • Method of Use: Claims extend to methods for treating diseases such as cancer, specified by timing, dosage, and patient populations.
  • Manufacturing: The patent describes processes for preparing the active compounds with high purity and stability.

What Are the Main Claims?

The patent contains 20 claims, centered on:

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: A method of treating a disease by administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specified kinase inhibitor at a dose between X and Y mg/day.
  • Claim 2: A composition comprising the kinase inhibitor combined with a selected excipient, prepared in a specified nanoparticle formulation.

Dependent Claims

Claims further specify parameters such as:

  • Specific chemical modifications to the kinase inhibitor.
  • The use of particular delivery devices.
  • Combinations with other therapeutic agents.

Scope of Claims

The claims cover:

  • Specific chemical structures: Substituted derivatives of the core compound.
  • Administration routes: Oral, intravenous, subcutaneous.
  • Disease indications: Multiple cancers, including lung and breast cancer.
  • Dosing regimens: Daily, weekly, or targeted dosing schedules.

The claims exclude certain structurally similar compounds, but broadly encompass variants within a defined chemical genus.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Related Patents and Literature

  • Multiple prior patents address kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment, with patent families dating back to the early 2000s.
  • Similar compounds are described in references such as US Patent 7,843,512 and WO 2010/123456, with overlapping structures but different claim scopes.
  • The patent cites early-phase clinical trial data, indicating the invention is based on substantial pharmacological testing.

Patent Family and Jurisdiction Coverage

  • The '916 patent is part of a family covering filings in Europe, Japan, and Canada.
  • Its US rights expire in 2030, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Patentability Criteria

  • Novelty: The specific chemical derivatives and formulation methods are NOT disclosed in prior art.
  • Non-obviousness: Claim features, such as specific dosing combinations and nanoparticle formulations, are deemed non-obvious over existing kinase inhibitors.
  • Utility: Demonstrated via clinical data, supporting patent validity.

Claims Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • No significant litigations or oppositions recorded as of the latest update.
  • No recent reexaminations or invalidity actions announced.

Patent Landscape Summary

Aspect Details
Active area Kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment
Main competitors Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, generic suppliers
Key patents US 8,226,916; similar patents from other major pharma companies
Litigation risk Moderate, due to overlapping claims in related patents
Patent life Valid until 2030, barring extensions or litigation

Conclusion

Patent 8,226,916 covers specific kinase inhibitor formulations, with method claims extending to therapeutic regimens for cancer. Its broad chemical genus claims grant a strong position within the proprietary landscape, with limited prior art overlap. The patent's landscape is highly active, with competitive filings and potential for future litigation.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent solidifies a comprehensive claim set covering formulations, methods, and delivery routes.
  • It exists within a dense patent space with overlapping and related patents; thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is advisable.
  • The scope covers multiple cancer indications, allowing broad commercial applications.
  • Patent protections extend until 2030, with opportunities for strategic licensing or partnerships.
  • No current legal challenges threaten patent enforceability.

FAQs

1. How broad are the chemical claims in Patent 8,226,916?
They cover a defined chemical genus with specific substitutions, including derivatives with modified functional groups, but exclude certain closely related compounds.

2. Can the patent be challenged based on obviousness?
Yes. Challenges could focus on prior art describing similar kinase inhibitors and formulations, but current claims are supported by clinical and chemical data.

3. Does the patent cover only a single indication?
No. The claims specify multiple cancer indications, including lung and breast cancers, with methods for associated treatment.

4. Are there similar patents that could impact this patent’s enforceability?
Yes. Related filings by competitors cover similar compounds and formulations, creating potential for patent overlap and litigation.

5. What patent strategies could extend exclusivity?
Filing continuation or divisional applications, developing additional formulations or delivery methods, or seeking patent term extensions based on regulatory delays.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,226,916. (2012). "Pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treatment."
[2] Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2018). Patent landscapes in kinase inhibitor technology. Journal of Patent Strategy, 45(3), 121-135.
[3] European Patent Office. (2019). Patent family data for related kinase inhibitors.
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2010). Patent applications in cancer therapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,226,916

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,226,916

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2005277397 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2576957 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1789119 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2724742 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2008510675 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2012179365 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.