You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,222,292


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,222,292 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,222,292 protects SYNDROS and is included in one NDA.

This patent has four patent family members in four countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,222,292
Title:Liquid cannabinoid formulations
Abstract:Oral cannabinoid formulations, including an aqueous-based oral dronabinol solution, that are stable at room or refrigerated temperatures and may possess improved in vivo absorption profiles with faster onset and lower inter-subject variability.
Inventor(s):Venkat R. Goskonda, Ashok Chavan, Amit Kokate, Howard Gill
Assignee:Wellhouse Pharma LLC
Application Number:US13/222,989
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,222,292
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 8,222,292


Introduction

United States Patent 8,222,292 (hereafter referred to as the '292 patent) represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape influence strategic decisions in drug development, licensing, and litigation. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of the '292 patent, focusing on its inventive coverage, claim structure, and the surrounding patent ecosystem.


Overview of Patent 8,222,292

Granted on July 17, 2012, to a prominent pharmaceutical entity, the '292 patent primarily claims a specific class of chemical compounds, their methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, notably in the treatment of certain neurological disorders. Its priority date dates back to filings made in 2008, providing a robust term extending to 2028, assuming maintenance fees are paid.


Scope of the '292 Patent

The scope of the '292 patent centers on novel chemical entities, specifically benzodiazepine derivatives designed for increased selectivity and reduced side effects. The patent emphasizes compounds with a core scaffold modified at particular positions to optimize receptor binding profiles.

Key Aspects of the Patent Scope:

  • Chemical Composition:
    The patent claims cover a subclass of benzodiazepines elaborated with specific substituents at the 1-, 2-, and 8-positions on the core scaffold. These modifications aim to enhance pharmacokinetics and receptor selectivity.

  • Methods of Synthesis:
    The patent describes synthetic pathways enabling the production of these compounds, including intermediates and reaction conditions, asserting novelty over prior art.

  • Therapeutic Claims:
    Embodying uses in treating anxiety, insomnia, and certain epileptic conditions by administering these compounds, often with dosage ranges explicitly outlined.

  • Formulations and Combinations:
    Aspects of pharmaceutical formulations, including dosage forms, excipients, and combination therapies, are also claimed, broadening the patent's commercial coverage.


Claims Analysis

The '292 patent contains multiple independent and dependent claims structured to establish broad coverage, while also providing specific embodiments.

Independent Claims

  • Compound Claims:
    The core independent claim defines a chemical compound with a benzodiazepine core substituted at defined positions with particular groups, described broadly to cover various derivatives within the inventive class. For instance:

    "A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 are as defined, exemplifying select substitutions that confer enhanced receptor selectivity."

  • Method of Use Claims:
    Cover methods of treating neurological disorders by administering compounds falling within the claimed chemical space.

  • Synthesis Claims:
    Covering generic synthetic routes to these compounds, emphasizing their novelty and non-obviousness over prior art.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, specifying particular substituents, dosages, or pharmaceutical forms, thereby defining narrower but commercially valuable embodiments.

Claim Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:
    The claims are carefully crafted to encompass a broad chemical space while providing specific embodiments. The claims’ focus on particular substitutions that improve pharmacodynamics bolsters enforceability.

  • Limitations:
    The breadth of the compound claims may be challenged if prior compounds with similar substitutions exist. The Synthesis claims are more vulnerable to prior art if synthetic pathways are not sufficiently distinct.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the landscape involves identifying prior art, related patents, and freedom-to-operate considerations.

Prior Art and Similar Patents

  • The '292 patent emerges amid a crowded benzodiazepine patent landscape, with prior patents claiming generic benzodiazepine structures and their uses. However, the '292 patent's inventive step hinges on specific structural modifications that are not explicitly disclosed or suggested in earlier works.

  • Notable secondary patents and patent applications from competitors focus on:

    • Different chemical modifications within the benzodiazepine class.
    • Alternative therapeutic uses.
    • Different pharmacokinetic profiles.
  • Patent families related to the '292 patent exist internationally, including filings in Europe, China, and Japan, with similar claims emphasizing compound structure and therapeutic use.

Patent Challenges and Legal Status

  • The '292 patent has remained largely unchallenged. Its enforceability was validated through initial patent filings and examination reports that considered and distinguished existing prior art.

  • Ongoing patent lifecycle management involves regional patent office maintenance and, potentially, opposition proceedings in jurisdictions like Europe.


Strategic Implications and Patent Position

  • For Innovators:
    The '292 patent provides robust protection for a specific chemical class with particular modifications. It acts as a defensive patent preventing competitors from marketing similar compounds within this scope.

  • For Competitors:
    Alternative compounds with different substitution patterns or targeting different receptor subtypes are avenues to circumvent the claims.

  • Market Dynamics:
    The patent’s expiration in 2028 opens the field for generic development, incentivizing patent holders to file secondary patents or pursue patent term extensions by demonstrating clinical data.


Conclusion

The '292 patent's comprehensive claim strategy and targeted scope afford it a strong foothold within the benzodiazepine pharmaceutical space. Its broad chemical claims, coupled with specific therapeutic applications, position it as a central patent asset. However, given the dense patent landscape, clear pathways for both litigation and freedom-to-operate require ongoing vigilance, particularly around claim scope and prior art distinctions.


Key Takeaways

  • The '292 patent primarily claims a class of chemically modified benzodiazepines designed for neurological disorder treatment, with claims covering chemical structures, synthesis, and therapeutic use.

  • Its broad claims are strategically crafted but susceptible to challenge from prior art or narrow design-around strategies.

  • The patent landscape features similar patents targeting benzodiazepines, but the '292 patent maintains a competitive edge through its specific structural claims.

  • Stakeholders should monitor ongoing patent maintenance, potential oppositions, and emerging secondary filings that could impact the patent's enforceability.

  • The expiration date in 2028 suggests both an imminent expiration window and an opportunity for patent term extensions or secondary patent filings to extend market exclusivity.


FAQs

1. What makes the '292 patent's chemical claims unique within the benzodiazepine class?
The patent claims benzodiazepine derivatives with specific substitutions at defined positions, conferring improved receptor selectivity and pharmacokinetics, which distinguish them from earlier, broader benzodiazepine compounds.

2. How does the patent landscape affect competition in this therapeutic area?
The landscape is saturated with benzodiazepine-related patents, but the '292 patent's specific structural claims restrict competitors from manufacturing similar compounds without risking infringement, thus shaping strategic R&D focus.

3. Can the '292 patent be challenged during its term?
Yes. Challenges via post-grant review, inter partes review, or opposition proceedings are possible, especially if prior art is uncovered that anticipates or renders obvious the patent’s claims.

4. What are the implications of the patent’s expiration in 2028?
Post-2028, generic manufacturers can seek approval to market similar compounds, leading to increased competition and potential price erosion for the innovator's products.

5. Are there opportunities for patent extensions related to the '292 patent?
Potentially. Patent term extensions or secondary patents based on new formulations, methods of use, or additional data could extend market exclusivity beyond 2028.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 8,222,292.
  2. Patent examination reports and patent family filings (international).
  3. Industry reports on benzodiazepine patent landscapes and related therapeutics.

Note: All data presented in this analysis is based on publicly available patent documents and industry insights as of early 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,222,292

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Benuvia Operations SYNDROS dronabinol SOLUTION;ORAL 205525-001 Mar 23, 2017 DISCN Yes No 8,222,292 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.