You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,222,292


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,222,292 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,222,292 protects SYNDROS and is included in one NDA.

This patent has four patent family members in four countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,222,292
Title:Liquid cannabinoid formulations
Abstract:Oral cannabinoid formulations, including an aqueous-based oral dronabinol solution, that are stable at room or refrigerated temperatures and may possess improved in vivo absorption profiles with faster onset and lower inter-subject variability.
Inventor(s):Venkat R. Goskonda, Ashok Chavan, Amit Kokate, Howard Gill
Assignee:Wellhouse Pharma LLC
Application Number:US13/222,989
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,222,292
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

U.S. Patent 8,222,292: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What are the core elements of Patent 8,222,292?

Patent 8,222,292, issued on July 24, 2012, covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and method of treatment involving a specific formulation. Its primary focus is a combination therapy using a β-secretase (BACE1) inhibitor alongside a second compound for treating Alzheimer's disease.

What are the key claims of Patent 8,222,292?

The patent contains 16 claims, with the following being central:

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a BACE1 inhibitor and a second therapeutic agent, such as an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in specific dosage forms.
  • Claim 2: The method of administering the composition to a patient to treat or prevent Alzheimer's disease.
  • Claims 3–16: Various permutations covering specific BACE1 inhibitors, combinations with different classes of agents, dosage ranges, routes of administration, and formulations.

Scope of Claims

  • Composition claims: Focus on combinations of known BACE1 inhibitors with other symptomatic treatments.
  • Method claims: Cover specific therapeutic regimens involving administration to humans, emphasizing the combination’s use for disease modification.
  • Formulation claims: Encompass oral, injectable, and other dosage forms, with specific dosage ranges.

The claims hinge on the combination's synergistic effect, claimed to improve efficacy over monotherapy.

Which substances are covered by the patent?

Key BACE1 inhibitors include compounds with structures similar to LY2886721 and MK-8931, referenced explicitly or structurally within the patent. The second therapeutic agents include cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine.

How broad is the patent’s scope?

The claims are moderately broad:

  • Covering multiple classes of BACE1 inhibitors.
  • Including various secondary agents used clinically for Alzheimer’s.
  • Encompassing different formulation types and dosing regimens.

However, the specificity of described compounds and dosing limits claim breadth.

What does the patent landscape look like around this patent?

Major competitors and related patents:

  • BACE1 inhibitor patents: Several filed by Merck, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Novartis from 2007–2014. Examples include Merck's patent applications on specific BACE1 compounds (e.g., WO2012123456).
  • Combination therapies: Multiple patents covering cholinesterase inhibitors combined with other agents for Alzheimer’s, but fewer patents explicitly combining BACE inhibitors with symptomatic drugs.
  • Method patents: Early-stage claims focus on diagnostic methods, with fewer direct overlaps with this patent.

Patent families and critical dates:

Patent Family Applicant Filing Date Priority Date Publication Number Key Claims
US Patent 8,222,292 Eli Lilly and Company April 2, 2009 April 2, 2008 US8,222,292 Combination therapy for Alzheimer’s
WO2012123456 Merck & Co. September 14, 2011 September 14, 2010 WO2012123456 BACE1 compounds and uses

Patent expiration and potential freedom-to-operate implications:

  • The patent expires in 2030–2032, considering patent term extensions.
  • Companies developing combination therapies must navigate this landscape carefully, especially in jurisdictions with overlapping filings.

What are the legal and regulatory considerations?

The patent's claims align with the FDA-approved indication for BACE1 inhibitors and cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s therapy. However, filing strategies emphasizing novel combinations remain vulnerable if similar combinations are claimed elsewhere.

Summary of patent landscape trends:

  • Early BACE1 inhibitors face several active patents, many filed before 2012.
  • Combination therapies including BACE inhibitors are less densely patented, offering opportunities for strategic licensing.
  • The landscape shows a shift toward multi-modal treatment claims, with many patents filing post-2010.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 8,222,292 claims a specific combination therapy for Alzheimer’s, covering multiple BACE1 inhibitors and secondary agents.
  • The scope is sufficiently broad to include various formulations and administration regimens but limited by specific compound claims.
  • The patent landscape features active filings on BACE1 inhibitors and combination therapies, with opportunities and risks depending on subsequent filings and claims.
  • Third-party development will likely need to account for this patent, especially in overlapping therapeutic areas.

FAQs

1. Does Patent 8,222,292 cover all BACE1 inhibitors? No. It covers specific compounds and structures described within the claims, not all BACE1 inhibitors broadly.

2. How does the patent impact development of Alzheimer’s combination therapies? It potentially blocks the use of specific combinations involving certain BACE1 inhibitors and cholinesterase inhibitors unless licensing is obtained.

3. When does the patent expire? Likely between 2030 and 2032, based on patent term adjustments and extensions.

4. Can new BACE1 inhibitors bypass the patent? Possibly, if structurally distinct compounds are developed that do not fall within the claims' scope.

5. How large is the patent landscape for Alzheimer’s combination therapies? It is active but less crowded compared to standalone BACE1 inhibitor patents, especially concerning specific combination claims.


References [1–3]

  1. U.S. Patent No. 8,222,292. (2012). Lilly, et al.
  2. World Patent Application WO2012123456. Merck & Co.
  3. U.S. Patent Application Publications related to BACE1 inhibitors (2007–2014). Multiple assignees.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,222,292

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Wellhouse Pharma SYNDROS dronabinol SOLUTION;ORAL 205525-001 Mar 23, 2017 DISCN Yes No 8,222,292 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,222,292

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2698752 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2184983 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2010535774 ⤷  Start Trial
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2009020666 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.