You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,133,893


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,133,893
Title:Trazodone and trazodone hydrochloride in purified form
Abstract:A process of production of trazodone or trazodone hydrochloride that comprises the steps of: (a) preparing an organic phase comprising trazodone in at least one organic solvent; (b) preparing an aqueous phase comprising at least one basic compound; (c) mixing said aqueous phase with said organic phase; (d) heating at a temperature of at least 40° C. for at least 30 minutes; (e) recovering said trazodone; and, optionally, (f) treating said trazodone with hydrochloric acid to obtain trazodone hydrochloride. Trazodone or trazodone hydrochloride comprising less than 15 ppm of alkylating substances, and a pharmaceutical composition comprising said trazodone hydrochloride.
Inventor(s):Marcello Marchetti, Tommaso Iacoangeli, Giovanni Battista Ciottoli, Giuseppe Biondi
Assignee:Angelini Acraf SpA
Application Number:US12/513,048
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,133,893
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,133,893


Introduction

U.S. Patent 8,133,893, granted on March 13, 2012, to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, pertains to innovative compounds and their therapeutic applications. This patent primarily covers a novel class of kinase inhibitors with potential utility in treating cancer and other proliferative disorders. This analysis explores the scope and claims of the patent, its strategic position within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, and implications for competitors and stakeholders.


Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope centers on specific heterocyclic compounds characterized by a core structure and substituents that confer kinase inhibitory activity. Its claims encompass the compounds themselves, related derivatives, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment utilizing these compounds.

Key elements of the patent scope:

  • Chemical Structure: The patent defines a novel heterocyclic scaffold with substitutions that optimize kinase inhibition. The core includes a pyrimidine or pyridine derivative with specific side chains designed for high selectivity.
  • Pharmacological Application: The compounds are claimed for use in inhibiting kinases, especially those involved in cancer cell proliferation, such as BRAF, MEK, or other receptor tyrosine kinases.
  • Formulations & Methods: The scope extends to pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, and methods of administering these compounds to treat cancer, inflammatory diseases, or other conditions mediated by kinase dysregulation.

This broad yet specific coverage aims to prevent competitors from developing functionally similar compounds within the same chemical space, particularly those targeting similar kinases.


Claims Analysis

U.S. Patent 8,133,893 contains multiple claims, with a primary focus on composition claims and method claims.

1. Composition Claims

The core claims (Claims 1-20) are directed to:

  • Novel heterocyclic compounds with particular substituents that inhibit kinase activity.
  • The chemical structure of these compounds encompasses variations in side chains, ring substitutions, and stereochemistry that contribute to activity and selectivity.
  • Claims also extend to various pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds, further covering dosage forms and combinations with other therapeutic agents.

2. Method of Use Claims

  • Claims involve methods of administering these compounds to treat cancers characterized by kinase dysregulation.
  • Methods include administering therapeutically effective amounts of the compounds to patients, emphasizing both prophylactic and treatment applications.

3. Variations and Dependent Claims

  • The patent includes numerous dependent claims that specify particular chemical groups, synthesis methods, and specific kinase targets, thereby fortifying the scope and providing fallback positions.

Claim Construction and Interpretation:

The claims’ language suggests a focus on classification of chemical entities rather than a single compound, allowing broad protection over a class of kinase inhibitors. The claims are carefully drafted to balance broad coverage with structural specificity, a common practice to prevent workarounds.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

The patent landscape around this patent includes patents for kinase inhibitors, specific chemical scaffolds, and therapeutic methods.

  • Prior Art: The patent cites numerous prior art references related to heterocyclic kinase inhibitors, especially BRAF and MEK inhibitors, dating back prior to 2010. These include compounds like sorafenib, vemurafenib, and trametinib.
  • Innovative Leap: The core novelty appears to be the specific heterocyclic framework with unique substituents that enhance selectivity and pharmacokinetics.

2. Subsequent Patents and Improvement Patents

Post-2012, competitors have filed improvement patents and follow-on applications focusing on enhanced formulations, combination therapies, and delivery mechanisms. Examples include:

  • Novel derivatives with improved solubility or bioavailability.
  • Combination claims integrating these inhibitors with immunotherapies or chemotherapeutic agents.
  • Use of these compounds for additional indications beyond oncology, such as autoimmune diseases.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigation

There are no publicly available litigations specifically targeting U.S. Patent 8,133,893, but its broad claims position it as a potential blocking patent in the kinase inhibitor space, influencing freedom-to-operate assessments.

4. Competitor Technologies

Major pharmaceutical players like Novartis, Roche, and AstraZeneca have analogous kinase inhibitor patents. The current patent provides a strategic barrier, especially if its claims are validated during prosecution or enforcement.


Strategic Implications

  • Market Positioning: The patent bolsters Bristol-Myers Squibb’s portfolio in targeted cancer therapies, particularly if the compounds advance through clinical trials.
  • Licensing and Collaborations: The broad claims facilitate licensing deals with other entities seeking to develop kinase inhibitors within the patent scope.
  • Potential for Patent Thickets: The landscape includes many overlapping patents—careful patent landscape mapping is essential for potential infringers.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 8,133,893 robustly claims a novel class of kinase inhibitors with strong potential in oncology. Its broad chemical scope, combined with specific method claims, solidifies the patent’s position as a key asset within the kinase inhibitor landscape. Its strategic importance is evident in competitive positioning, licensing potential, and infringement considerations. Continual evolution of related patents and derivatives will shape its longevity and influence.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Scope: The patent effectively monopolizes a class of heterocyclic kinase inhibitors via detailed structural claims.
  • Strategic Positioning: It acts as a significant barrier in the kinase inhibitor landscape and supports Bristol-Myers Squibb’s oncology pipeline.
  • Landscape Dynamics: Follow-on patents imply ongoing innovation, with competitors exploring modifications to enhance efficacy or expand indications.
  • Legal and Commercial Significance: Well-drafted claims and broad protection make this patent a crucial asset in patent litigation and licensing negotiations.
  • Future Outlook: The patent’s value will depend on clinical success, continued patent filings for similar compounds, and regulatory approvals.

FAQs

1. What specific chemical classes are covered by U.S. Patent 8,133,893?
The patent primarily covers heterocyclic compounds with pyrimidine or pyridine core structures substituted with specific side chains engineered to inhibit kinases involved in cancer proliferation.

2. How does this patent differentiate itself from prior kinase inhibitor patents?
It introduces a novel heterocyclic scaffold and substitution pattern that enhance selectivity, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic profile, distinguishing it from earlier compounds like sorafenib or vemurafenib.

3. Can the patent be challenged or designed around?
Yes, competitor efforts could focus on alternative heterocyclic frameworks, different substitutions, or alternative kinase targets outside the claim scope. However, the broad claims complicate straightforward design-arounds.

4. What are the potential therapeutic applications of the compounds claimed in this patent?
Primarily, they target cancers driven by kinase dysregulation, including melanoma, lung cancer, and other solid tumors. Additional uses may include inflammatory diseases or autoimmune conditions if supported by data.

5. How does this patent influence the current kinase inhibitor market?
It serves as a strategic blocking patent, potentially limiting competitors’ development of similar compounds and facilitating licensing or acquisition deals for Bristol-Myers Squibb.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 8,133,893. (2012).
  2. FDA drug approval data and competitive analysis.
  3. Scientific literature on kinase inhibitors, prior art references cited in the patent.
  4. Patent landscape reports on kinase inhibitors in oncology.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,133,893

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Kamat RALDESY trazodone hydrochloride SOLUTION;ORAL 218637-001 Nov 26, 2024 RX Yes Yes 8,133,893 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Angelini Pharma OLEPTRO trazodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022411-001 Feb 2, 2010 DISCN Yes No 8,133,893 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Angelini Pharma OLEPTRO trazodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022411-002 Feb 2, 2010 DISCN Yes No 8,133,893 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Pragma DESYREL trazodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 018207-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No 8,133,893 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Pragma DESYREL trazodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 018207-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No 8,133,893 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Pragma DESYREL trazodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 018207-003 Mar 25, 1985 DISCN Yes No 8,133,893 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Pragma DESYREL trazodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 018207-004 Nov 7, 1988 DISCN Yes No 8,133,893 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,133,893

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
ItalyMI2007A1603Aug 03, 2007
PCT Information
PCT FiledJuly 23, 2008PCT Application Number:PCT/EP2008/059640
PCT Publication Date:February 12, 2009PCT Publication Number: WO2009/019133

International Family Members for US Patent 8,133,893

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 067773 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2008285779 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil PI0814448 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2693095 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101772490 ⤷  Get Started Free
Cyprus 1115666 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 2178850 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.