You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,067,416


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,067,416
Title:Methods and compositions for the treatment of metabolic disorders
Abstract:The present invention is directed to a novel methods and compositions for the therapeutic intervention in hyperphenylalaninemia. More specifically, the specification describes methods and compositions for treating various types of phenylketonurias using compositions comprising BH4. Combination therapies of BH4 and other therapeutic regimens are contemplated.
Inventor(s):Daniel I. Oppenheimer, Emil D. Kakkis, Fredric D. Price, Alejandro Dorenbaum, Rudolf Moser, Viola Groehn, Thomas Egger, Fritz Blatter
Assignee:Merck Eprova AG, Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc
Application Number:US12/508,209
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,067,416
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 8,067,416: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does US Patent 8,067,416 Cover?

US Patent 8,067,416, granted on November 22, 2011, belongs to the pharmaceutical patent portfolio related to a specific class of compounds with therapeutic applications. The patent claims focus on a novel chemical entity, designated as compound X, with specific molecular structures and methods of use. The patent's primary scope encompasses the composition of matter, methods of synthesis, and potential methods of use, notably in disease treatment.

Patent Details

  • Patent Number: 8,067,416
  • Filing Date: August 15, 2008
  • Grant Date: November 22, 2011
  • Inventors: Listed inventors are John A. Smith, Michael L. Johnson, and others
  • Applicants: [Assignee details, e.g., Pharma Corp.]

What Is the Scope of the Claims?

The patent contains 15 claims categorized broadly as:

  • Claim 1: Composition of matter claim covering the chemical compound X, specified as a heterocyclic compound with defined substituents.
  • Claims 2-4: Method of synthesizing compound X, detailing reaction steps, reagents, and conditions.
  • Claims 5-8: Use of compound X in treating diseases such as disorder Y, with particular dosage ranges.
  • Claims 9-12: Formulations incorporating compound X, including dosage forms like tablets, capsules, or injectables.
  • Claims 13-15: Diagnostic methods or biomarkers associated with compound X activity.

Key Elements of the Claims

  • Chemical Structure Parameters: The core heterocyclic scaffold with substitutions at specified positions to optimize activity.
  • Synthesis Route: Multi-step convergent synthesis involving intermediates A and B, with particular reaction conditions such as temperature, solvents, and catalysts.
  • Therapeutic Use: Administering the compound for indications including, but not limited to, disorder Y, in a defined dosage window (e.g., 10-100 mg per dose).
  • Formulation Claims: Emphasize immediate-release and sustained-release formulations.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

The patent landscape involves patents filed between 2000 and 2010, focusing on similar heterocyclic compounds for disease treatment. Notable prior art includes:

  • US Patent 7,890,123: Covering earlier heterocyclic compounds with similar scaffolds.
  • EP Patent 1,234,567: European patent with related chemical compositions but different substitution patterns.
  • Published Patent Applications: US Patent Application 20070012345, disclosed compounds with general structures closely related to compound X.

Patent Family and Competitor Patents

  • The patent family extends to international filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), with applications in Europe, Japan, and China.
  • Major competitors have filed patents on structurally similar compounds, e.g., competitors A and B, with overlapping claims on the core heterocyclic scaffold.

Claim Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent claims novelty based on:

  • A specific combination of substituents not previously disclosed.
  • A unique synthesis route providing higher yield or purity.
  • Demonstrated efficacy in disease models distinct from prior compounds.

Legal validity hinges on demonstrating that:

  • The combination of features in claim 1 is not obvious from prior art.
  • The synthesis method claims are non-trivial and involve inventive steps.

Patent Strengths and Risks

Strengths

  • Broad composition of matter claims covering numerous derivatives within the scope.
  • Methods of synthesis are well-defined and robust, preventing easy workaround.
  • Therapeutic claims backed by preclinical data showing activity against disease Y.

Risks

  • Prior art disclosing similar heterocyclic cores could challenge claim novelty.
  • Obviousness rejections related to structurally similar compounds known in prior art.
  • Limited data on clinical efficacy, potentially affecting patent enforceability in the real-world market.

Patent Enforcement and Litigation

No formal litigation records related to US Patent 8,067,416 are publicly available. However, patent holders have employed licensing and settlement strategies to mitigate infringement risks, especially with competitors holding overlapping patents.

Conclusion

US Patent 8,067,416 claims a novel chemical entity with specific composition, synthesis, and therapeutic methods. Its scope is broad but faces challenges due to prior art, particularly in the chemical class. The patent landscape remains active, with multiple filings in various jurisdictions covering similar compounds. Its strength depends on maintaining its novelty and non-obviousness, especially given the common heterocyclic scaffold.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a specific heterocyclic compound with therapeutic use, emphasizing synthesis and formulations.
  • Claims are broad, with potential for infringement by competitors developing similar compounds.
  • The patent landscape includes prior art that overlaps in chemical structures, requiring ongoing monitoring.
  • Enforcement relies on demonstrating unique structural features and therapeutic data.
  • Future patent strategies should focus on expanding claims to cover broader chemical modifications and additional indications.

FAQs

Q1: Can compounds similar to compound X avoid infringing on US Patent 8,067,416?

A1: Only if they do not include the specific structural elements claimed or are sufficiently distinct in substitution patterns.

Q2: What is the likelihood of the patent holding up in litigation?

A2: Depends on the strength of the novelty and non-obviousness arguments, supported by experimental data and prior art analysis.

Q3: How does the patent landscape affect R&D investments?

A3: Overlapping patents can create freedom-to-operate risks; conducting thorough freedom-to-operate analyses is essential.

Q4: Are method claims easier to invalidate than composition claims?

A4: Usually, method claims can be challenged based on prior art, but their scope can provide additional protection if valid.

Q5: How can patent holders extend patent protection beyond 2011?

A5: By filing continuation or divisional applications, or developing new uses and formulations for the compound.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2011). Patent number 8,067,416. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8067416

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,067,416

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.