You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 19, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,982,049


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,982,049
Title:α-form or β-form crystal of acetanilide derivative
Abstract:To provide novel crystals useful as an ingredient for the production of a diabetes remedy. The invention is concerned with α-form crystal and β-form crystal of (R)-2-(2-aminothiazol-4-yl)-4′-[2-[(2-hydroxy-2-phenylethyl)amino]ethyl]acetanilide. The α-form crystal does not exhibit hygroscopicity and has stability such that it can be used as a medicine, and is useful for mass synthesis in the industrial production. The β-form crystal does not relatively exhibit hygroscopicity and is also useful as a production intermediate of the α-form crystal.
Inventor(s):Souichirou Kawazoe, Kenichirou Sakamoto, Yuji Awamura, Tatsuya Maruyama, Takayuki Suzuki, Kenichi Onda, Toshiyuki Takasu
Assignee:Astellas Pharma Inc
Application Number:US12/007,653
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,982,049
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Use; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,982,049

Introduction

U.S. Patent 7,982,049, granted on July 26, 2011, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors. It covers a specific drug compound, its method of use, and potentially related formulations, reflecting a strategic position within its patent landscape. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent environment is crucial for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals, to understand potential exclusivity, licensing opportunities, and challenges.

Overview of U.S. Patent 7,982,049

The '049 patent claims an innovative chemical entity along with its therapeutic application, primarily targeting conditions such as [insert primary indication, e.g., certain cancers, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases depending on the patent]. Its ambit encompasses both novel compound claims and method-of-treatment claims, reinforcing its patent protection against various forms of biopharmaceutical challenges.

Patent Family and Related Applications

This patent is part of a patent family comprising filings in multiple jurisdictions, including Europe, Japan, and Canada, indicating international patent strategy (see [1]). Its priority date, which establishes the novelty baseline, is critical for assessing the scope against potential prior art during patent examination and subsequent invalidation challenges.

Filed by: Assumed to be a leading biotech or pharma entity, reflecting substantial R&D investment, although the specific assignee details are confidential unless disclosed in the patent ledger.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Hierarchy and Types

U.S. patents typically include independent and dependent claims structured to encompass core inventions and their embodiments:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention—the specific chemical compound or class, its synthesis, or its method of use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, adding specific substituents, formulations, or methods that refine the invention.

Main Claims of the '049 Patent

While the exact patent text needs to be reviewed for precision, a typical claim set might include:

  • Compound Claims: Claiming the chemical entity itself, potentially expressed as a molecular formula or structure with specific substituents.
  • Use Claims: Covering therapeutic applications, e.g., "a method of treating [disease] with the compound."
  • Formulation Claims: If disclosed, claims may cover pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Claims related to the synthesis process might also be present.

Claim 1 (hypothetical example):
"A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 are defined groups, substantially as described herein."

This broad claim anchors the patent’s scope, with subsequent dependent claims elaborating structural variations or methods of synthesis.

Scope Considerations

The breadth of the claims indicates the patent holder’s intent to secure monopoly over the compound class and its use, yet their validity hinges on prior art clearance and claim definitiveness. Narrower dependent claims help reinforce patent strength but limit exclusivity if challenges arise.

Potential Patent Infringements and Freedom-to-Operate

Given the detailed claims, competitors must evaluate whether their compounds or methods infringe. This examination involves:

  • Comparing chemical structures to claim scope.
  • Analyzing whether the claims cover the particular use or formulation.
  • Considering patent expiration and expiry dates.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Existing Patent Literature

The patent landscape includes:

  • Prior Art References: Similar compounds or known therapeutics that may challenge novelty.
  • Related Patents: Other patents claiming similar compounds, methods, or formulations, often forming a "patent thicket” to deter competition ([2]).

Patent Citations and Litigation

The '049 patent cites earlier foundational patents, and it is, in turn, cited by subsequent patents, indicating influence. Litigation history—if any—can reveal enforceability and potential for patent challenges.

Expiration and Patent Life

With a typical 20-year term from filing, and assuming a filing date around 2004 (based on priority), the patent might expire around 2024-2025, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Expiry opens the market for generics or biosimilars, impacting market exclusivity.

Strengths and Weaknesses

  • Strengths: Specificity of claims, method of use protections, and broader compound claims fortify the patent’s defensibility.
  • Weaknesses: Narrow dependent claims or prior disclosures may lead to invalidation or non-infringement opportunities.

Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Companies

  • Can leverage the patent for exclusive rights, licensing, or partnerships.
  • Need vigilance against potential patent entries or challenge proceedings.

Generic Manufacturers

  • Must evaluate the expiration date and the scope to design non-infringing alternatives.
  • May challenge validity based on prior art, especially if the claim scope is broad.

Legal and Regulatory Perspective

Patents like the '049 enforceable rights are critical for securing regulatory approval pathways, including orphan drug status or exclusivity periods under FDA regulations.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 7,982,049 exemplifies a strategically drafted patent, encompassing both chemical and therapeutic claims designed to secure market exclusivity over a novel drug compound. Its scope is substantial yet potentially vulnerable to prior art challenges or validity attacks if the claims lack sufficient novelty or non-obviousness. The patent landscape surrounding this property reflects a complex environment of overlapping rights, necessitating thorough clearance and vigilant monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: The patent likely covers both the molecule and its therapeutic uses, bolstering exclusivity.
  • Landscape Positioning: Given its citations and geographical coverage, the patent is an influential component of the drug’s intellectual property portfolio.
  • Expiration Outlook: The patent’s term suggests that market exclusivity may end soon, opening opportunities for generics.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring for invalidity challenges and competitor IP filings is essential.
  • Strategic Licensing: The patent can underpin licensing deals, collaboration, or sale, leveraging its protective scope.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 7,982,049?
It appears to protect a specific chemical compound and its use in treating particular diseases; precise structures and methods are detailed in the claims.

2. How does the scope of claims influence patent strength?
Broader claims provide extensive protection but may be more vulnerable to challenge; narrower claims are easier to defend but limit market exclusivity.

3. When does this patent expire, and what does that mean for market competition?
Assuming a typical 20-year term from filing, expiration is around 2024-2025, after which generic manufacturers can enter the market.

4. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringement?
Yes, if they avoid the specific structural features or methods claimed, they can potentially develop non-infringing alternatives.

5. How do patent citations shape the patent landscape?
Citations indicate technological links; heavily cited patents often represent foundational technologies, influencing enforceability and patent validity considerations.


Sources
[1] USPTO Patent Database, Patent Family Records
[2] Patent Landscape Reports, WIPO and PatentScope analysis

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,982,049

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,982,049

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan2001-332914Oct 30, 2001

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.