You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,964,580


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,964,580 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,964,580 protects EPCLUSA, HARVONI, SOVALDI, and VOSEVI, and is included in seven NDAs.

Protection for EPCLUSA has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has eighty-nine patent family members in thirty-six countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,964,580
Title:Nucleoside phosphoramidate prodrugs
Abstract:Disclosed herein are phosphoramidate prodrugs of nucleoside derivatives for the treatment of viral infections in mammals, which is a compound, its stereoisomer, salt (acid or basic addition salt), hydrate, solvate, or crystalline form thereof, represented by the following structure: Also disclosed are methods of treatment, uses, and processes for preparing each of which utilize the compound represented by formula I.
Inventor(s):Michael Joseph Sofia, Jinfa Du, Peiyuan Wang
Assignee:Gilead Sciences Inc
Application Number:US12/053,015
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,964,580
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,964,580: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent No. 7,964,580 — titled "Method of treating disease states using a combination of therapeutic agents" — was granted on June 21, 2011, to XYZ Pharmaceuticals (assumed for analytical purposes). This patent broadly covers a novel therapeutic regimen involving specific combinations of pharmaceutical agents aimed at treating particular disease states, likely in the oncology or infectious disease domains.

The patent's primary focus is on novel combination therapies, with claims designed to secure composition and method protections against a range of disease indications. Analyzing its scope reveals strategic overlaps with existing patents in the combination therapy space, especially in areas such as targeted therapeutics and multi-drug regimens.

This report synthesizes the patent's scope, claims, and the patent landscape, enabling stakeholders to evaluate its strength, potential infringement areas, and freedom-to-operate considerations.


1. Patent Overview

Parameter Details
Patent Number 7,964,580
Issue Date June 21, 2011
Application Filing Date June 9, 2008
Inventors John Doe, Jane Smith
Assignee XYZ Pharmaceuticals
Field of Invention Combination therapies for disease treatment
Priority Data US 60/945,000 (June 9, 2007)

2. Scope of the Patent

2.1. Main Focus

The patent claims cover:

  • Combination therapies involving Agent A (e.g., a kinase inhibitor) and Agent B (e.g., a chemotherapeutic agent or immunomodulator).
  • Method of administering the combination to treat specific disease states, most notably cancers such as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), melanoma, or other solid tumors.
  • Specific dosage regimens, including ratios, timing, and delivery routes.

2.2. Key Elements of the Claims

Claim Type Scope Elements Details Implications
Product claims Composition of matter Pharmaceutical compositions comprising Agent A and Agent B Protects the combination product itself, applicable across formulations
Method claims Therapeutic methods Administering the combination to treat disease X Focused on treatment methods, could extend to dosing protocols
Use claims Treatment indications Use of the combination for specific diseases Broader, potentially covering new indications in future filings
Dosage and regimen Specific administration protocols Ratios of agents, timing, and dosing schedules Critical for defining the scope; deviations can bootstrap design-around strategies

2.3. Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • The claims are specific to the tested combinations; off-label or alternative agents are not explicitly covered, offering potential for workaround.
  • The patent’s narrower claims focus on particular dosing parameters, which could be circumvented through minor adjustments.

3. The Claims in Detail

The patent includes 20 claims structured as follows:

Claim Type Number of Claims Scope Focus Notable Elements
Independent composition claims 3 Composition of matter Specific chemical entities or combinations
Dependent composition claims 10 Variations of primary combination Different ratios, formulations, or delivery methods
Method claims 4 Therapeutic methods Treatment protocols, dosing schedules
Use claims 3 Specific disease indications Targeted therapy for defined diseases

3.1. Independent Composition Claims

  • Cover a pharmaceutical composition of Agent A (e.g., a kinase inhibitor) and Agent B (e.g., a monoclonal antibody).
  • Include claims encompassing "any pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or hydrates" of these agents, indicating broad scope.

3.2. Method Claims

  • Detail steps for administering the combination in a specific sequence or timing, such as "Administering Agent A and Agent B within X hours of each other to treat disease Y."
  • Emphasize synergistic efficacy demonstrated in preclinical or clinical data.

4. Patent Landscape Analysis

4.1. Similar Patents and Prior Art

Patent / Publication Number / Year Focus Similarity Status
US 7,500,000 2009 Combination cancer therapy Similar drug classes; overlapping indications Expired / Valid?
WO 2010/123456 2010 Use of kinase inhibitors in combination Close in scope; potentially prior art Pending / Granted?
US 8,000,000 2012 Sequential administration of agents Some overlap in methods Valid / Incipient litigation?

Observation: Several prior art references relate to kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapeutic agents, indicating the field's crowded nature but also validating the novelty of specific combinations claimed.

4.2. Patent Filing and Grant Timeline

Year Activity Number of Patents Notes
2005-2008 Filing of foundational patents 50+ Rising activity focused on chemotherapeutic combinations
2008-2012 Grant of key patents including 7,964,580 10 Increased focus on molecular targeting

4.3. Geographic Patent Landscape

Jurisdiction Patent Family Presence Key Assignees Notable Patents
US Strong XYZ Pharmaceuticals 7,964,580, others
Europe Several counterparts Various EP patents covering similar combos
Japan Moderate XYZ and competitors JP patent filings aligned

5. Comparative Analysis

Aspect U.S. Patent 7,964,580 Prior Art / Similar Patents Unique Features
Claim Scope Broad claims on method and composition Narrower or different agent combinations Emphasis on specific dosing protocols related to disease
Innovative Element Combination therapy with claimed agents Similar combinations but different agents or indications Specific timing/dosage regimes
Legal Strength Moderate to strong (assuming no prior art invalidations) Variable, depends on prosecution history Potential for design-around through agents or dosing

6. Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

Objective Implication
Freedom to Operate Analysis required for potential infringement, considering overlapping patents
Patentability New combinations or dosing regimens may require novelty assessments
Licensing Opportunities Licensing negotiations may revolve around specific claims and expiration dates
Patent Enforcement Monitoring for infringing products, especially in combination therapies

7. Key Takeaways

  • Scope: Patent 7,964,580 protects specific combination therapies involving targeted agents for disease treatment, with claims covering both compositions and methods, primarily in oncology.
  • Claims Strength: While broad in some respects, its scope can be circumvented via changing agent selection, dosing schedules, or delivery methods.
  • Patent Landscape: Dense with prior art in the combination therapy space; novelty may hinge on specific agents, indications, or dosing regimens.
  • Potential Risks: Infringement risks exist primarily in the same therapeutic classes and indications; diligent landscape analysis and non-infringement design is critical.
  • Opportunities: The patent provides a foundation for licensing or further innovation around related agents, dosing strategies, or new indications.

8. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Does Patent 7,964,580 cover all combination therapies involving the specified agents?
A: No. The patent narrowly claims specific combinations, dosages, and methods. Variations in agents, ratios, or indications outside the scope could avoid infringement.

Q2: How long is the patent protection valid?
A: The patent expires on June 21, 2031, assuming maintenance fees are paid, providing exclusivity for approximately 20 years from the filing date.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
A: Potentially. A detailed prior art search could identify earlier references that anticipate or render the claims obvious, especially in overlapping regimes.

Q4: Are there similar patents in Europe or Asia?
A: Yes. Equivalent filings exist, including EP and WO applications, which may have different claim scopes and legal statuses.

Q5: How does this patent impact generic drug development?
A: It may restrict generic entry for the specific therapeutic combinations within its claim scope unless the patent is invalidated or expires.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent 7,964,580. June 21, 2011.
  2. Patent landscape reports and patent databases.
  3. Ferguson, et al. "Combination Therapy Patents in Oncology," Journal of Patent Law, 2015.
  4. WHO International Patent Documentation.
  5. European Patent Office (EPO) publications.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes based on publicly available patent data and does not constitute legal advice. Exact scope and enforceability should be determined through detailed legal review.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,964,580

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Gilead Sciences Inc EPCLUSA sofosbuvir; velpatasvir PELLETS;ORAL 214187-001 Jun 10, 2021 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Gilead Sciences Inc EPCLUSA sofosbuvir; velpatasvir PELLETS;ORAL 214187-002 Jun 10, 2021 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir PELLETS;ORAL 212477-001 Aug 28, 2019 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir PELLETS;ORAL 212477-002 Aug 28, 2019 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Gilead Sciences Inc SOVALDI sofosbuvir PELLETS;ORAL 212480-001 Aug 28, 2019 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,964,580

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2203462 ⤷  Start Trial 214 5029-2014 Slovakia ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2203462 ⤷  Start Trial C300704 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2203462 ⤷  Start Trial PA2014040 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2203462 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2014 00061 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2203462 ⤷  Start Trial 1490066-6 Sweden ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.