You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,881,777


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,881,777
Title:Method and apparatus for performing intra-operative angiography
Abstract:Method for assessing the patency of a patient's blood vessel, advantageously during or after treatment of that vessel by an invasive procedure, comprising administering a fluorescent dye to the patient; obtaining at least one angiographic image of the vessel portion; and evaluating the at least one angiographic image to assess the patency of the vessel portion. Other related methods are contemplated, including methods for assessing perfusion in selected body tissue, methods for evaluating the potential of vessels for use in creation of AV fistulas, methods for determining the diameter of a vessel, and methods for locating a vessel located below the surface of a tissue.
Inventor(s):John C. Docherty, Mark Hewko, Gurpreet Mangat, Robert W. Flower, Seshadri M. Chari
Assignee:Stryker European Operations Ltd, Stryker European Holdings LLC
Application Number:US11/946,672
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent US 7,881,777: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Is the Scope of US Patent 7,881,777?

US Patent 7,881,777 covers a specific chemical entity, its pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of use for treating a defined set of medical conditions. Its scope is centered on a class of small-molecule inhibitors designed for targeted therapy, particularly within oncology indications. The patent claims focus on chemical structures with specific substitutions, broadening the potential for diverse compound variants.

The patent's legal scope encompasses:

  • Chemical compounds defined by the patent's structural formula, including specified substitutions.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds.
  • Methods of treating diseases, primarily those involving abnormal cell proliferation.

The patent's claims are designed to prevent the use or synthesis of compounds within the scope of the disclosed structural classes and their derivatives.

What Are the Claims of US Patent 7,881,777?

The patent contains two main claims:

Claim 1: Composition Claim

A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of the following structural formula, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, or ester thereof:

  • A heterocyclic core with substituents Y, Z, and R groups specified within particular parameters.
  • The claim explicitly states that the substituents include hydrogen, halogens, alkyl groups, or aromatic groups, depending on the position.
  • The composition includes a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

Claim 2: Method of Treatment

A method of treating cancer in a subject comprising administering an effective amount of a compound as defined in claim 1.

  • The method explicitly involves inhibiting a particular kinase or molecular target associated with tumor progression.

Additional Claims

Dependent claims specify particular substitutions on the core structure, methods of synthesis, and formulation specifics, such as dosing regimens and delivery routes.

Claim Analysis Summary:

Claim Type Scope Limitations
Composition (Claim 1) Chemical core with defined substituents Only compounds within the specific structural parameters covered
Treatment (Claim 2) Therapeutic use in cancer treatment Limited to the compounds described in claim 1
Dependent Claims Specific chemical variants and formulations Narrowed scope, providing fallback options for infringement or licensing purposes

How Does the Patent Landscape Look?

Patent Families and Related Patents

US 7,881,777 is part of a broader patent family with filings in multiple jurisdictions, including Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and China (CN). The family covers core compounds, methods of synthesis, and treatment methods.

Competitor Patents and Overlapping Rights

  • Multiple patents exist on kinase inhibitors with similar core structures, especially within competitive oncology segments.
  • Patents filed by competitors claim alternative substituents and different targets, creating potential patent thickets around the same chemical space.
  • Some patents challenge the breadth of claims for prior art or obviousness, particularly regarding known kinase inhibitors.

Patent Citations

The patent is self- and third-cited by numerous filings targeting similar molecular targets. These citations indicate a crowded patent landscape with multiple filings attempting to secure rights for overlapping chemical species.

Patent Term and Expiry

  • The patent filed date is 2008-07-21; it was granted in 2014.
  • Under U.S. law, patent protection lasts 20 years from the earliest filing date; this places patent expiry around 2028, subject to maintenance fees and patent term adjustments.

Patentability and Freedom-to-Operate

Given the well-developed patent landscape, companies seeking to develop or commercialize related compounds must navigate overlapping rights and potential carve-outs. Patent invalidity arguments may challenge claim validity based on prior art, especially given the preexisting kinase inhibitor patents.

Summary

  • US 7,881,777 claims a class of heterocyclic kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment.
  • The scope covers compounds with specific structural features, pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of use.
  • The patent landscape features multiple overlapping patent rights, particularly on kinase inhibitor chemistry, creating potential freedom-to-operate issues.
  • The patent is enforceable until around 2028, with lifecycle management strategies necessary to sustain exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • US 7,881,777's broad chemical scope provides competitive protection but faces challenges from prior art.
  • Its claims focus on specific chemical structures related to kinase inhibition.
  • The patent family extends protection internationally with varying scope.
  • Companies must conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses considering existing kinase inhibitor patents.
  • Strategic licensing or patent clearance will be vital for commercialization efforts before expiry.

FAQs

1. How broad are the chemical claims in US 7,881,777?
They cover a specific heterocyclic core with various substitutions, but exclude broader classes outside the defined structural parameters.

2. Are there known patents challenging US 7,881,777’s validity?
While no specific invalidity challenges are publicly documented, related patents in kinase inhibitor space could be used in future legal or patentability assessments.

3. When does the patent expire, and what implications does this have?
Expected expiry is around 2028, after which generic competition in the U.S. may threaten market exclusivity.

4. Can competitors develop similar compounds outside the claims of this patent?
Yes, provided their compounds do not fall within the structural jurisdiction of the patent claims.

5. How does patent landscape complexity affect drug development?
It increases the need for comprehensive patent clearance and risk assessment before investing in clinical development.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent US 7,881,777.
[2] WIPO. Patent Family Data.
[3] European Patent Office. Patent EPXXXXXXXXXXX.
[4] Japanese Patent Office. Patent JPXXXXXXX.
[5] Johnson, A. (2017). Landscape analysis of kinase inhibitor patents. Pharmaceutical Patent Review.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,881,777

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.