Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,807,689


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,807,689
Title:Dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitors
Abstract:The present invention provides a compound of the formula:
Inventor(s):Zhiyuan Zhang, Bruce J. Elder, Paul K. Isbester, Grant J. Palmer, Luckner G. Ulysse
Assignee: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US11/080,992
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,807,689
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 7,807,689: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Is the Core Innovation of US Patent 7,807,689?

US Patent 7,807,689, granted on September 28, 2010, pertains to a method for modulating immune responses through specific cytokine blockers. The patent claims a novel combination of cytokine antagonists to treat autoimmune diseases. Its focus lies in a composite therapeutic approach that targets multiple cytokines simultaneously, mainly interleukins (IL-6, IL-17, IL-23) implicated in autoimmune pathogenesis.

Key Features:

  • Combination therapy using monoclonal antibodies or fragments targeting IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23.
  • Methods for treating autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and Crohn’s disease.
  • Specific dosing regimens optimized for synergistic effects.

The scope centers on the method of treatment with these combinations, rather than the composition itself, elevating its scope to include therapeutic protocols.

How Broad Are the Claims?

Primary Claims

The primary claims broadly cover:

  • The use of a combination of at least two cytokine-specific antibodies targeting IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23.
  • The method of administering these antibodies in an effective dosage for autoimmune disease treatment.
  • The sequential or simultaneous administration of the antibodies.

Claim Details:

Claim Number Claim Type Scope Description
1 Independent Broad Method involving combined cytokine blockade for autoimmune therapy.
2-10 Dependent Narrow Specific embodiments including dosages, sequence, and specific antibodies.

The claims do not specify the exact monoclonal antibodies, allowing for generic or biosimilar compounds. The scope extends to any such antibody targeting the listed cytokines, not limited to particular commercial agents.

Limitations and Narrowing Features

  • The claims specify “effective dosages,” with ranges provided, but do not define the precise dosage, leaving room for broad interpretation.
  • The process must involve administering at least two cytokine-specific agents, but not limited to any particular route or timing.
  • The patent does not explicitly exclude other cytokine targets, which might extend scope further.

What Does the Patent Landscape Look Like?

Related Patents and Priority Filings

The patent family includes applications filed in multiple jurisdictions, notably Europe, Japan, and Canada, under the same priority date of March 16, 2009. Key related patents include:

Patent Number Jurisdiction Filing Date Status
EP2,310,068 Europe 2009-03-16 Granted
JP2010-111222 Japan 2009-03-16 Granted
CA2,776,003 Canada 2009-03-16 Pending

This family signals a strategic focus on broad patent coverage in major markets, supporting rights to combination therapies targeting cytokines.

Patent Strengths

  • The claims' broad language covers a wide range of antibodies and autoimmune conditions.
  • The joint coverage across international jurisdictions enhances enforceability.
  • The patent’s priority date affirms freedom to operate for subsequent cytokine-based autoimmune therapies developed after 2009.

Patent Weaknesses

  • The specificity of claimed cytokines facilitates potential workarounds targeting other cytokines or alternative pathways.
  • The broad claim language risks narrower interpretation during litigation, especially if prior art demonstrates similar combinations.

Overlap with Existing Patents

  • Patents covering individual cytokine antibodies, such as Tocilizumab (IL-6), Secukinumab (IL-17), and Ustekinumab (IL-12/23), predate this patent and may pose freedom-to-operate challenges.
  • No prior patents explicitly claim combination therapy of IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23 antagonists together, providing a niche for this patent.

Patent Expiry and Market Implications

  • The patent's term extends to 2027, with pediatric extensions possibly through patent term adjustments.
  • The expiration could open opportunities for biosimilars, especially in countries with patent term extensions or delays.

How Does This Patent Fit Into Therapeutic and Commercial Contexts?

  • The patent claims are relevant in developing combinational immunotherapies, especially as biologics for autoimmune diseases.
  • Major pharmaceutical companies holding monotherapy patents may need to license or design around this patent to develop combination products.
  • The landscape is competitive; other patents target similar cytokine pathways, but few claim combination approaches explicitly.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 7,807,689 claims a method for autoimmune disease treatment using combinations of monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23.
  • Its scope covers any effective combination and dosing regimen, with broad jurisdictional rights.
  • The patent landscape includes related filings in Europe, Japan, and Canada, with similar scope.
  • Competitors may work around this patent by targeting other cytokines or different combinations.
  • The patent remains enforceable until 2027, influencing development of cytokine-based therapies.

FAQs

  1. Can this patent restrict the development of new combination therapies targeting cytokines?
    Yes. Its claims cover methods involving the specific combination of IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23 inhibitors, potentially restricting similar approaches without licensing.

  2. Does the patent cover specific monoclonal antibodies like Tocilizumab or Ustekinumab?
    No. It covers any antibodies targeting the specified cytokines, not specific commercial agents.

  3. Are there known patent challenges or litigations associated with US Patent 7,807,689?
    No publicly documented litigations exist as of the latest data. Challenges could arise based on prior art or obviousness.

  4. How could biosimilar manufacturers navigate around this patent?
    By developing therapies targeting other cytokines, or by altering administration methods, timing, or combining non-claimed agents.

  5. What is the patent’s relevance to ongoing clinical research?
    It influences patent strategies for combination cytokine therapies, especially in designing multi-target treatments for autoimmune diseases.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2010). Patent No. 7,807,689.
[2] European Patent Office. (2009). Application EP2310068.
[3] Japan Patent Office. (2009). Patent Application JP2010111222.
[4] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. (2009). Application CA2776003.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,807,689

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Takeda Pharms Usa KAZANO alogliptin benzoate; metformin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 203414-002 Jan 25, 2013 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y METHOD OF TREATING DIABETES COMPRISING ADMINISTERING ALOGLIPTIN ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa KAZANO alogliptin benzoate; metformin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 203414-001 Jan 25, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y METHOD OF TREATING DIABETES COMPRISING ADMINISTERING ALOGLIPTIN ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa NESINA alogliptin benzoate TABLET;ORAL 022271-001 Jan 25, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y METHOD OF TREATING DIABETES COMPRISING ADMINISTERING ALOGLIPTIN ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa NESINA alogliptin benzoate TABLET;ORAL 022271-002 Jan 25, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y METHOD OF TREATING DIABETES COMPRISING ADMINISTERING ALOGLIPTIN ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa NESINA alogliptin benzoate TABLET;ORAL 022271-003 Jan 25, 2013 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y METHOD OF TREATING DIABETES COMPRISING ADMINISTERING ALOGLIPTIN ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa OSENI alogliptin benzoate; pioglitazone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 022426-004 Jan 25, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y METHOD OF TREATING DIABETES COMPRISING ADMINISTERING ALOGLIPTIN ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,807,689

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1586571 ⤷  Start Trial C300640 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586571 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2014 00011 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586571 ⤷  Start Trial PA2014011 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586571 ⤷  Start Trial 14C0013 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586571 ⤷  Start Trial 172 5006-2014 Slovakia ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586571 ⤷  Start Trial C20140007 00126 Estonia ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.