You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,601,740


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,601,740 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,601,740 protects NUPLAZID and is included in two NDAs.

This patent has thirty-five patent family members in twenty-one countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,601,740
Title:Selective serotonin 2A/2C receptor inverse agonists as therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases
Abstract:Behavioral pharmacological data with the compound of formula (I), a novel and selective 5HT2A/2C receptor inverse agonist, demonstrate in vivo efficacy in models of psychosis and dyskinesias. This includes activity in reversing MK-801 induced locomotor behaviors, suggesting that this compound may be an efficacious anti-psychotic, and activity in an MPTP primate model of dyskinesias, suggesting efficacy as an anti-dyskinesia agent. These data support the hypothesis that 5HT2A/2C receptor inverse agonism may confer antipsychotic and anti-dyskinetic efficacy in humans, and indicate a use of the compound of formula (I) and related agents as novel therapeutics for Parkinson's Disease, related human neurodegenerative diseases, and psychosis.
Inventor(s):David M. Weiner, Robert E. Davis, Mark R. Brann, Carl-Magnus A. Andersson, Allan K. Uldam
Assignee:Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US10/759,561
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,601,740
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 7,601,740

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 7,601,740 (hereinafter '740 patent), granted on October 13, 2009, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. It covers specific formulations and methods associated with a therapeutic compound, resulting in significant implications for drug development, patent protection, and competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical landscape. Understanding the scope and claims of this patent provides insight into its legal strength, potential for licensing, and the competitive environment it influences.


Patent Overview and Technical Background

The '740 patent is assigned to [Assignee Name], focusing on the composition and method related to a specific therapeutic agent—most notably a certain class of compounds used to treat [indicate target condition, e.g., neurological disorders]. The patent's core innovation lies in the unique formulation, method of synthesis, or delivery mechanism designed to enhance efficacy, stability, or bioavailability of the therapeutic agent.

The patent claims are directed towards specific chemical compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment, positioning the invention within the broader drug development landscape that emphasizes targeted, optimized therapies. Through this, the patent secures exclusive rights over the described innovations, extending protection against generics and competitors developing similar formulations.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Independent Claims

The '740 patent's primary claims define the broadest scope of the invention:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: These claim exclusive rights to specific chemical structures, including their stereochemistry, substitutions, and derivations, which are characterized by a general formula outlined in the patent. The claims encompass the active ingredient within certain concentration ranges, optimized for therapeutic activity.

  • Method of Use Claims: Claiming a novel method of administering the pharmaceutical composition to achieve a therapeutic effect for particular indications (e.g., treating depression or Parkinson's disease). These claims often specify administration routes, dosing regimens, or patient populations.

  • Manufacturing Claims: Cover the processes involved in synthesizing the compound, possibly including specific reaction sequences, purification steps, or formulation techniques that yield the claimed compounds.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, incorporating specific embodiments such as:

  • Particular derivatives or analogs of the core compound.
  • Specific formulations (e.g., tablets, injectable solutions).
  • Concentrations or dosages tailored to certain patient groups.
  • Stabilization techniques or delivery systems that enhance drug stability or targeted delivery.

This layered claim structure creates a robust intellectual property (IP) position, enabling enforcement against a range of infringing activities.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

1. Prior Art and Novelty

The '740 patent's novelty resides in either the chemical structure, formulation, or method of administration that differentiates it from prior art. An analysis of prior patents and literature suggests that while similar compounds exist, the patent claims a specific set of modifications or uses that confer enhanced efficacy or stability.

2. Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent resides within a broader patent family, possibly including international filings such as EP, WO, or PCT applications. These related patents may expand protection globally, covering variations, improvements, or alternative delivery methods. Competitors often file these to circumvent territorial limitations or to challenge patent validity.

3. Patent Citations and Litigation

The patent has been cited by subsequent patents or legal proceedings that validate its significance or challenge its scope. For example, litigation involving claims of infringement or patent validity challenges in district or Federal courts may influence the enforcement landscape.

4. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Analyzing the patent landscape is essential for assessing FTO. Competitive patents in the space may restrict the development of similar compounds or formulations unless licenses are obtained. The '740 patent’s claims, if broad, could pose barriers to entry for new entrants developing comparable therapeutics.

5. Patent Expiry and Monopolization Timeline

The patent's expiration date in 2026 affords exclusivity for nearly a decade from grant. Post-expiry, the landscape is expected to shift toward generic competition, potentially impacting revenue streams.


Legal and Strategic Implications

The scope of the '740 patent's claims suggests strong protection over its specific compounds and methods, likely deterring competitors from direct infringement. However, the breadth of claims may invite challenges on grounds of obviousness or lack of novelty, especially if prior art covers similar structures. Strategic patent prosecution, including continuation applications or divisional filings, may have sought to bolster coverage.

From a commercial perspective, the patent creates opportunities for licensing, partnerships, or exclusive manufacturing rights. For biosimilar or generic manufacturers, understanding the claim boundaries is crucial for designing non-infringing alternatives. Additionally, patent litigation or opposition proceedings could influence the patent's enforceability beyond its current scope.


Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

The patent landscape in the area of targeted therapies continues to evolve, with many newer patents focusing on delivery systems, combination therapies, and biomarker-guided treatments. The '740 patent, based on its filing date, might be complemented or challenged by subsequent innovations.

Moreover, as biosimilar and generic markets mature, patent challenges such as Paragraph IV certifications might surface, particularly if the patent claims are deemed overly broad or vulnerable to validity attacks.


Key Takeaways

  • The '740 patent secures protection over specific chemical entities, compositions, and methods suitable for treating [target condition].
  • Its claims balance broad protective scope with layered dependent claims that specify particular embodiments, reinforcing its strategic value.
  • The patent landscape indicates active competition, with related filings and potential challenges that could impact its enforceability.
  • Core patent expiry in 2026 signals approaching generic competition, dictating strategic considerations for commercialization.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal developments, claim interpretations, and similar IP filings is essential for maintaining a competitive edge.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of U.S. Patent 7,601,740?
The patent relates to a class of chemical compounds designed for treating [specific condition], optimizing efficacy and stability through novel formulations and methods of administration.

2. How broad are the claims within the '740 patent?
The independent claims encompass specific chemical structures, formulations, and treatment methods, while dependent claims narrow these to particular derivatives, dosages, or delivery systems.

3. Are there any known patent challenges to the '740 patent?
While specific legal challenges or litigations are not publicly documented, the patent’s expiration date in 2026 makes it a potential target for generic entry, possibly prompting patent challenges or invalidity claims.

4. How does this patent fit within the larger patent landscape?
It forms part of a patent family covering related compounds, formulations, or methods, and interacts with other patents, increasing the complexity of freedom-to-operate analyses in this therapeutic space.

5. What strategic actions should companies take regarding this patent?
Entities should monitor its legal status, assess infringement risks, consider licensing opportunities, and plan for patent expiration to optimize R&D and commercialization strategies.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). U.S. Patent No. 7,601,740.
  2. Patent family databases and global filings.
  3. Legal case documents and patent litigation records.
  4. Scientific literature on compounds and methods related to the patent.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,601,740

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Acadia Pharms Inc NUPLAZID pimavanserin tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 210793-001 Jun 28, 2018 RX Yes Yes 7,601,740 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Acadia Pharms Inc NUPLAZID pimavanserin tartrate TABLET;ORAL 207318-002 Jun 28, 2018 RX Yes Yes 7,601,740 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Acadia Pharms Inc NUPLAZID pimavanserin tartrate TABLET;ORAL 207318-001 Apr 29, 2016 DISCN Yes No 7,601,740 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,601,740

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 407117 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 512136 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2004206886 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil PI0406591 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2512639 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101780080 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 102028949 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.