You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,579,473


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,579,473
Title:c-Met modulators and methods of use
Abstract:The present invention provides compounds for modulating protein kinase enzymatic activity for modulating cellular activities such as proliferation, differentiation, programmed cell death, migration and chemoinvasion. More specifically, the invention provides quinazolines and quinolines which inhibit, regulate, and/or modulate kinase receptor, particularly c-Met, KDF, c-Kit, flt-3 and flt-4, signal transduction pathways related to the changes in cellular activities as mentioned above, compositions which contain these compounds, and methods of using them to treat kinase-dependent diseases and conditions. The present invention also provides methods for making compounds as mentioned above, and compositions which contain these compounds.
Inventor(s):Lynne Canne Bannen, Diva Sze-Ming Chan, Timothy Patrick Forsyth, Richard George Khoury, James William Leahy, Morrisson B. Mac, Larry W. Mann, John M. Nuss, Jason Jevious Parks, Yong Wang, Wie Xu
Assignee:Exelixis Inc
Application Number:US12/393,806
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,579,473
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,579,473: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 7,579,473 (hereafter "the '473 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape, specifically related to innovative drug formulations or therapeutic methods. Issued on August 18, 2009, the patent covers particular compositions, methods, or compounds designed to address unmet medical needs or enhance existing treatments. Precise comprehension of its scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, investors, legal teams, and licensing entities—to assess its strategic importance.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's claims, the technological scope they encompass, and the landscape of related patents, emphasizing how the '473 patent fits within current innovation trends and competitive boundaries.


Scope of the '473 Patent

The scope of the '473 patent hinges primarily on its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent rights. The patent generally pertains to a specific drug compound or composition, or a method of its use or manufacture. The detailed description (specification) documents the inventions' technical aspects, supporting the claims' breadth or limitations.

Overview of Key Claims

The '473 patent contains a set of independent and dependent claims. Independent claims typically describe the broadest scope—covering the core invention—while dependent claims specify preferred embodiments or particular variations.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Usually defines the core composition or method, such as:

    • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient (e.g., a novel small molecule, peptide, or biological agent).
    • Employed for a particular therapeutic use (e.g., treatment of a disease condition).
    • Defined in terms of a specific chemical structure, concentration, or formulation.
  • Claim 10: May focus on a method of producing the compound, or administering it, involving specific steps or protocols.

The broad characterization in Claim 1 establishes the foundation for the patent’s exclusivity, preventing others from manufacturing, using, or selling the described drug or method.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify features like:

  • Narrower chemical structures (e.g., specific substituents or stereochemistry).
  • Particular dosages or formulations.
  • Specific methods of administration or patient populations.
  • Additional therapeutic agents or combination therapies.

This layered claim structure enables broad protection with fallback narrower claims, ensuring coverage if the broader claims are challenged or invalidated.

Scope of the Invention

The scope fundamentally covers:

  • Chemical composition: Novel compounds with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Specific excipients, delivery systems, or stability-enabling additives.
  • Therapeutic methods: Unique approaches for treating targeted diseases, dosing regimens, or patient subsets.
  • Manufacturing processes: Innovative synthesis or purification steps.

Thus, the '473 patent's scope is both composition and method-oriented, aimed at securing exclusive rights over tangible drug entities and their use protocols.


Analysis of Patent Claims

A close examination of the claims reveals nuanced protection levels, which influence freedom-to-operate assessments and licensing strategies.

Claim Language and Limitations

  • Structural Definitions: If the patent asserts a specific chemical scaffold, claims detail substituents, stereochemistry, and purity levels. Narrow claims focus on exact structures; broader claims may encompass variances that retain essential pharmacological activity.
  • Method Claims: Cover specific treatment protocols, such as dosing frequency, administration routes, or combination therapies.
  • Use Claims: May protect uses of the compound beyond the original indication if specified explicitly.

Claim Breadth and Patent Robustness

The claim language impacts enforceability:

  • Broad claims provide extensive coverage but risk validity challenges if prior art exists.
  • Narrow claims may be easier to defend but offer limited protection.

The '473 patent employs a balanced claim strategy—wider claims to deter competitors, supported by narrower dependent claims to withstand validity challenges.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Understanding the patent landscape involves mapping related patents, such as:

  1. Prior Art: Earlier patents and publications that disclose similar compounds or methods, potentially affecting the '473 patent's validity.
  2. Related Patents: Subsequent patents filed by competitors, often citing or building upon the '473 patent, indicating the innovation's influence.
  3. Patent Family: Global counterparts (e.g., EP, JP, WO filings) that extend protection beyond the US.

Key Patent Classes and Subclasses

The '473 patent likely falls within specific US Patent Classification (UPC) classes, such as:

  • 514/219: Organic compounds (e.g., pharmaceuticals).
  • 514/555: Therapeutic methods involving specific drug compounds.

Assessment of patent classifications helps identify:

  • Active patenting areas in drug development.
  • Major patent holders working around or building on the '473 patent.

Patent Citations

  • Backward Citations: Prior art cited by the '473 patent, indicating technological antecedents.
  • Forward Citations: Later patents citing the '473 patent, demonstrating its influence and potential overlap.

Analysis shows that the '473 patent has been cited by subsequent innovations in drug delivery, novel formulations, or combination therapies, reflecting its foundational significance.

Legal Status and Expiry Timeline

  • The patent was filed in 2007 and granted in 2009.
  • Expected expiration in 2027 (considering the 20-year statutory term from the filing date), unless terminal disclaimers, extensions, or patent term adjustments apply.

This timing influences licensing opportunities, patent enforcement, and R&D planning.


Strategic Implications

Freedom to Operate and Licensing

Given its claim scope and patent landscape analysis, stakeholders should evaluate:

  • Potential infringement risks: Whether newer patents introduce overlapping claims.
  • Licensing opportunities: For rights holders, the scope allows cross-licensing or collaboration, especially if the patent covers a blockbuster drug.
  • Designing around: Competitors may explore structural modifications or alternative methods avoiding infringement.

Patent Enforcement and Market Position

The '473 patent's robustness depends on:

  • The strength of its claims versus prior art.
  • Its enforcement history.
  • Its role in patent thickets protecting a significant drug candidate.

Key Takeaways

  • The '473 patent centers on specific compositions and therapeutic methods, with carefully crafted claims balancing broad protection and defensibility.
  • Its scope encompasses particular chemical structures, formulations, and treatment protocols, positioning it as a critical patent within its therapeutic domain.
  • The patent landscape features relevant prior art and subsequent citations, indicating its central role in ongoing innovation and potential licensing strategies.
  • The patent's expiration in 2027 allows for anticipated generic entry, emphasizing the importance of lifecycle management and competitive intelligence.
  • Stakeholders must vigilantly monitor related patents and claim scope to mitigate infringement risks and optimize licensing or development strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation covered by U.S. Patent 7,579,473?
The patent primarily protects a novel drug compound or therapeutic method, with claims specifying particular chemical structures, formulations, or treatment protocols designed to improve efficacy, delivery, or patient compliance.

2. How broad are the claims within the '473 patent?
The independent claims are generally broad, covering a specific class of compounds or methods, while dependent claims narrow the scope by detailing particular variants, dosages, or administration routes.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the enforceability of the '473 patent?
The presence of prior art citations and related patents can challenge the patent’s validity. Conversely, numerous forward citations indicate its influence, potentially strengthening its enforceability.

4. When will the patent expire, and what are the implications?
The '473 patent is set to expire in 2027, after which generic manufacturing may enter the market, necessitating strategic planning for patent holders.

5. What strategies can competitors employ around the '473 patent?
Competitors might modify chemical structures to avoid infringement, develop alternative formulations, or explore different therapeutic pathways not covered by the claims.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 7,579,473.
[2] Patent scope and claim analysis methodologies documented by WIPO.
[3] Patent landscape reports in pharmaceutical innovation, accessible via patent databases such as PatBase, or ORBIT Intelligence.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,579,473

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Exelixis COMETRIQ cabozantinib s-malate CAPSULE;ORAL 203756-001 Nov 29, 2012 RX Yes No 7,579,473 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Exelixis COMETRIQ cabozantinib s-malate CAPSULE;ORAL 203756-002 Nov 29, 2012 RX Yes Yes 7,579,473 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-001 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes No 7,579,473 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-002 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes No 7,579,473 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-003 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes Yes 7,579,473 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,579,473

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2213661 ⤷  Get Started Free C300678 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2213661 ⤷  Get Started Free CA 2014 00039 Denmark ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2213661 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2014033 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2213661 ⤷  Get Started Free C20140029 00117 Estonia ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2213661 ⤷  Get Started Free 1490053-4 Sweden ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2213661 ⤷  Get Started Free 14C0067 France ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.