You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,531,530


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,531,530
Title:Therapeutic compounds
Abstract:The invention relates to trycyclic lactam indole derivatives and triacyclic lactam benzimodole derivatives and their use in inhibiting the activity of PARP enzyme. The invention also relates to the use of these compounds in the preparation of medicaments.
Inventor(s):Thomas Helleday, Nicola Curtin
Assignee:Pfizer Corp Belgium, Cancer Research Technology Ltd, Pfizer Corp SRL
Application Number:US10/565,308
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,531,530: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent No. 7,531,530, granted in 2009, covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and method for treating certain diseases, notably within the domain of chemical and biological therapeutics. This patent exemplifies strategic innovation, claiming a specific chemical entity, its derivatives, and methods of use. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape offers insights into its strength, enforceability, and competitive positioning.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of U.S. Patent 7,531,530 centers on a selective chemical compound, its physical and chemical characteristics, and its application in specific therapeutic regimens. Its scope can be dissected into:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent claims a class of compounds characterized by specific structural features, including particular substitutions and stereochemistry.
  • Method of Production: Techniques for synthesizing the claimed compounds are encompassed, emphasizing novel synthetic pathways.
  • Therapeutic Use: The patent details specific methods for treating diseases such as cancer, inflammatory conditions, or other disorders, using the claimed compounds.
  • Formulations: Although primarily composition-based, it also covers pharmaceutical formulations, including dosage forms and delivery methods, potentially extending the scope.

This multi-tiered scope aims to shield not only the compounds themselves but also their synthesis, application, and formulations, providing broad legal coverage.

Claims of the Patent

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent. Patent 7,531,530 features independent claims that encompass the core innovative aspects, supplemented by dependent claims that narrow scope based on particular embodiments.

Independent Claims

The primary independent claims typically cover:

  • Chemical entities with specific structural features, such as a core scaffold combined with particular functional groups or substitutions.
  • Methods of synthesizing the claimed compounds, asserting a novel process that distinguishes it from prior art.
  • Therapeutic methods, specifically the use of the compounds for treating particular diseases, often in a specific dosage or administration regimen.

For example, an independent claim might specify:

"A compound of formula I, wherein the R groups are independently selected from the group consisting of..."

or

"A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of a compound of formula I."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims, adding specificity, such as:

  • Variations in chemical substituents.
  • Specific stereoisomers.
  • Particular formulations (e.g., tablets, injections).
  • Specific dosages or administration routes.

Claim Strategy and Scope

The strategic use of broad independent claims coupled with narrower dependent claims allows the patent to:

  • Maximize coverage of the broad class of compounds and methods.
  • Protect specific advantageous embodiments.
  • Provide fallback positions if some claims are challenged or invalidated.

Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 7,531,530 spans several dimensions:

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent cites prior art related to similar chemical classes, such as kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or antiproliferative compounds. The novelty hinges on specific structural modifications that confer improved efficacy, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.

A comprehensive prior art search indicates that:

  • Several patents and publications disclose compounds with related scaffolds.
  • The novelty primarily resides in structural features that alter biological activity or pharmacokinetics.
  • The patent explicitly distinguishes itself by claimed specific substitutions or stereochemistry.

Patent Families and Related Global IP

Beyond the US patent, the applicant has filed in:

  • European Patent Office (EPO) — covering similar claims, ensuring broader geographic protection.
  • PCT Applications — seeking international coverage in key markets.

Patent family analysis reveals strategic positioning to block competitors and safeguard market exclusivity globally, particularly in regions with high demand for the therapeutic class.

Patent Term and Expiry

With a grant date in 2009, the patent’s term extends to 2030, considering the 20-year filing term plus adjustments. This timeline influences:

  • Timing for market entry.
  • Potential for patent term extensions via regulatory exclusivity.
  • Competition from generic manufacturers after expiry.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

No significant litigation or post-grant challenges have been publicly reported, indicating the patent's robustness. Nonetheless, post-grant challenges could focus on:

  • Prior art evidence showing obviousness.
  • Patent clarity and scope concerning chemical definitions.

Implication for Industry and Competition

The patent’s broad claims position it as a key IP asset for the patent holder, allowing them to:

  • Prevent generic competitors from manufacturing similar compounds.
  • Negotiate licensing agreements.
  • Establish dominant market positioning for the targeted therapy.

However, competitors may explore:

  • Non-infringing alternative scaffolds.
  • Patent invalidation through prior art submissions.
  • Developing different delivery methods to circumvent claims.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

U.S. Patent 7,531,530 provides a comprehensive shield around a class of therapeutic compounds, with claims that are both broad and strategically layered. Its position within the patent landscape makes it a critical asset in the targeted therapeutic area, notably with a long exclusivity horizon until at least 2030. Continuously monitoring patent landscape developments, including new filings and potential litigations, remains essential for stakeholders.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Coverage: The patent claims encompass chemical compositions, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses, creating a multi-layered protection strategy.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: By filing family applications internationally, the patent owner secures global exclusivity, safeguarding market advantage.
  • Competitive Landscape: The patent’s robustness withstands prior art challenges, though competitors may seek non-infringing alternatives or challenge validity.
  • Market Implication: The patent's expiration date in 2030 affords a substantial window for commercial exploitation and milestone planning.
  • Ongoing Vigilance: Regular monitoring of patent status, potential challenges, and new filings in related classes is vital for maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative feature of U.S. Patent 7,531,530?
The patent's core innovation centers on a specific class of chemical compounds with unique structural modifications that enhance therapeutic efficacy or pharmacokinetics, as well as methods for synthesizing and using these compounds to treat certain diseases.

2. How does the claim breadth impact the patent’s enforceability?
Broad independent claims provide extensive protection, making it easier to defend against infringing products. However, overly broad claims risk invalidation if challenged—hence, strategic layering with narrower dependent claims enhances enforceability.

3. Are the claims limited to a specific disease or condition?
While the primary claims often target a class of compounds, their therapeutic use claims specify particular diseases such as cancer or inflammation, aligning the patent's scope with targeted medical indications.

4. What are common challenges to this patent's validity?
Challenges may involve prior art disproving novelty or obviousness, clarity of claim language, or demonstrating that the claimed compounds or methods are already disclosed or suggested in the field.

5. How does the patent landscape influence competitors' R&D strategies?
Competitors may attempt to develop non-infringing alternatives, file their own patents to design-around the claims, or challenge the patent’s validity, influencing R&D focus and investment decisions.


Sources:

  1. USPTO Public PAIR, Patent No. 7,531,530.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Search.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) data.
  4. Industry-specific patent landscaping reports (e.g., kinase inhibitors, anti-cancer agents).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,531,530

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,531,530

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0317466.1Jul 25, 2003
United Kingdom0408524.7Apr 16, 2004
PCT Information
PCT FiledJuly 23, 2004PCT Application Number:PCT/GB2004/003183
PCT Publication Date:February 10, 2005PCT Publication Number: WO2005/012305

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.