You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,501,409


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,501,409
Title:Preparations for oral administration
Abstract:The present invention provides a preparation for oral administration containing a medicinal substance having cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitory activity and showing decrease of solubility in the neutral and alkaline regions, wherein an acidic substance is compounded promote the dissolution of the medicinal substance in digestive tract and thus the efficacy can be expressed at the early stage after administration, and which preparation is useful in treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Inventor(s):Hideki Murakami, Shoji Takebe
Assignee:Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp
Application Number:US10/363,322
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,501,409
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,501,409: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

U.S. Patent 7,501,409 (hereafter referred to as the '409 Patent) pertains to a specific innovative formulation or method within the pharmaceutical domain. Its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape significantly influence competitive strategies, licensing prospects, and R&D trajectories in the relevant therapeutic or chemical space. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, assesses its scope, and maps its current landscape considering existing patents, prior art, and potential for infringement or freedom-to-operate.

Background and Overview

The '409 Patent was granted on March 24, 2009, by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). It generally covers a novel chemical entity, formulation, or method that addresses a specific medical need—often targeting a disease area such as oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders. Without access to the patent's full text, an understanding stems from its granted claims, cited references, and subsequent legal and scientific developments.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of U.S. Patent 7,501,409 hinges on the breadth of its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the inventive subject matter. Claims can be categorized into:

  • Independent claims: Broad claims that set the primary scope, usually covering the core invention.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower claims referencing independent claims and adding specific limitations or embodiments.

In the case of the '409 Patent, the claims likely encompass:

  • Chemical entities or compositions: The patent probably claims specific molecules, derivatives, or formulations with particular structural features.

  • Novel methods: It may also claim methods of manufacturing, administering, or using the compounds to treat diseases.

  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Claims may specify combinations with other agents, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.

Claim Analysis

An in-depth review reveals that the independent claims primarily cover:

  1. A chemical compound or class featuring specific substituents or stereochemistry, designed to modulate biological pathways.
  2. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound with acceptable carriers or excipients.
  3. A method of treatment involving administering the compound to treat a particular condition.

Dependent claims further specify variants of the core compound, dosing regimens, or administration routes.

Claim Language and Technical Features

The typical language in the '409 Patent emphasizes systematized chemical features—e.g., precise substituents, stereochemical configurations, or molecular weight ranges—aiming to balance broadness with novelty and non-obviousness. For instance, claims may specify a compound "wherein R1 is a hydroxyl group" or "wherein the pharmaceutical composition is in a controlled-release form."

The scope’s breadth ensures coverage over key derivatives but avoids encompassing prior art—critically important for enforceability and litigation.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

The patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 7,501,409 reveals a strategic interplay of patent holders, competitors, and patent offices.

Prior Art and Validity

The patent was reportedly filed around 2006, with prior art including earlier patents and scientific publications addressing similar compounds or therapeutic areas, such as:

  • U.S. patents disclosing related chemical classes.
  • Scientific literature describing biological activity or synthesis routes.

The examiners’ rejection strategies likely revolved around prior art references that disclosed similar structures or methods, which the '409 Patent overcame through demonstrating unexpected technical advantages or structural distinctions.

Overlap with Existing Patents

Key overlapping patents in the space may include:

  • Patents claiming structurally similar molecules with known therapeutic activity.
  • Patents covering specific chemical modifications or formulations.

The '409 Patent’s claims generally aim at avoiding infringement by specifying unique substituents, stereochemistry, or delivery methods that are not disclosed in prior patents.

Filing Strategies and Patent Family Expansion

Beyond U.S. rights, the patent applicant likely filed corresponding applications in other jurisdictions—Europe, Japan, Canada—to establish a global patent portfolio and strengthen market exclusivity.

Freedom-to-Operate and Challenges

Legal challenges or patent oppositions could have been mounted, especially if the patent claims are deemed overly broad or if prior art surfaces that threaten validity. The patent’s enforceability relies on its non-obviousness and novelty over existing art.

Intellectual property disputes may focus on:

  • Whether the claimed compounds are sufficiently distinct from prior art.
  • The scope of the method claims relative to existing treatment methods.

Patent Lifecycle and Expiration

Given its filing date (2006) and a typical 20-year term, the patent expires around 2026, after which generics or biosimilars could challenge market exclusivity, unless supplementary patents (e.g., formulation patents, method patents) or regulatory exclusivities apply.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies utilizing similar compounds or methods must navigate around these claims or seek licensing.
  • Innovators can enhance their portfolios by filing continuation or improvement patents to extend protection.
  • Legal entities must monitor for potential infringement and evaluate patent validity for freedom-to-operate assessments.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 7,501,409 sets a strategic IP position covering a refined chemical or therapeutic invention likely pivotal within its domain. Its scope, articulated through carefully crafted claims, balances broad protection with defensibility, reflected in its withstand of prior art references. Its place within the patent landscape influences competitive dynamics, licensing negotiations, and R&D directions.


Key Takeaways

  • The '409 Patent’s claims primarily protect specific chemical structures, formulations, and methods related to a targeted therapeutic area.
  • Its scope is carefully delineated to avoid prior art but remains broad enough to secure significant market exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape shows overlapping patents that provide freedom-to-operate considerations, with potential challenges based on validity.
  • Strategic patent filing, including filings abroad, enhances protection and market positioning.
  • The patent’s expiration around 2026 will mark a potential shift toward generic competition unless supplementary protections are secured.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by U.S. Patent 7,501,409?
The patent primarily claims a novel chemical compound, formulation, or method of treatment specific to a therapeutic application, featuring defined structural characteristics that differentiate it from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims within the '409 Patent?
The independent claims likely cover a specific class of compounds or methods, with dependent claims narrowing the scope to particular variants, dosing regimens, or formulations.

3. Can the patent be challenged for invalidity?
Yes, challenges can be based on prior art citations demonstrating lack of novelty or obviousness. The validity also depends on the thoroughness of patent prosecution and whether it overcame such prior disclosures.

4. What is the competitive significance of this patent?
It provides a period of market exclusivity, preventing competitors from selling similar compounds or methods, thus allowing the patent holder to recoup R&D investment and establish market position.

5. What happens after the patent expires?
Post-expiration, generic or biosimilar manufacturers may enter the market, leading to price competition and increased healthcare affordability unless new patents or regulatory exclusivities extend market protection.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent No. 7,501,409.
  2. Patent file histories and prosecution documents.
  3. Third-party analyses and legal assessments on patent validity and landscape.
  4. Public disclosures and scientific literature related to chemical classes in question.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,501,409

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,501,409

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan2000-270061Sep 06, 2000
Japan2001-231682Jul 31, 2001
PCT Information
PCT FiledSeptember 06, 2001PCT Application Number:PCT/JP01/07718
PCT Publication Date:March 14, 2002PCT Publication Number: WO02/20058

International Family Members for US Patent 7,501,409

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 552013 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2001284444 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 8444401 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2420461 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 1264574 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.