You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,491,725


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,491,725 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,491,725 protects SPRYCEL and is included in one NDA.

Protection for SPRYCEL has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has forty-seven patent family members in twenty-nine countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,491,725
Title:Process for preparing 2-aminothiazole-5-aromatic carboxamides as kinase inhibitors
Abstract:The invention relates to processes for preparing compounds having the formula, and crystalline forms thereof, wherein Ar is aryl or heteroaryl, L is an optional alkylene linker, and R2, R3, R4, and R5, are as defined in the specification herein, which compounds are useful as kinase inhibitors, in particular, inhibitors of protein tyrosine kinase and p38 kinase.
Inventor(s):Jean Lajeunesse, John D. DiMarco, Michael Galella, Ramakrishnan Chidambaram
Assignee:Bristol Myers Squibb Co
Application Number:US11/192,867
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,491,725
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,491,725

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 7,491,725, granted on February 17, 2009, encompasses a specific technological breakthrough in the domain of pharmaceuticals. Primarily, it relates to compounds, compositions, and methods geared toward therapeutic interventions, with potential applications spanning multiple disease categories. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape offers vital insights for stakeholders — including patent attorneys, pharmaceutical companies, and biotech innovators — seeking to navigate or innovate within this IP space.


Scope of U.S. Patent 7,491,725

Field of Invention

The patent's technical field primarily covers novel chemical entities, their formulation, and methods for their therapeutic use. Its scope extends to compounds with specific structural features designed to modulate biological targets relevant to diseases, such as neurological disorders, cancers, or inflammatory conditions. The patent emphasizes the synthesis, characterization, and application of these molecules.

Broadness and Boundaries

The scope is deliberately broad in terms of chemical structure and therapeutic applications, but constrained by specific structural formulas and pharmaceutical properties detailed in the claims. This balance permits coverage over a class of compounds with similar core structures and functionalities while aiming to prevent circumvention through slight modifications.

Chemical Class and Structural Features

The invention describes a class of molecules characterized by a core scaffold—potentially a heterocyclic or aromatic framework—with various substitutions at predefined positions. These structural variants aim to optimize pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, or target affinity. The scope encompasses all derivatives adhering to the described core structure, with particular attention to specific substituents that confer desired activity.


Claims Analysis

Types of Claims

The patent includes multiple claim types:

  • Compound claims — cover specific chemical entities.
  • Composition claims — pertain to pharmaceutical formulations containing the claimed compounds.
  • Method claims — describe methods of synthesizing or administering the compounds.
  • Use claims — describe methods for treating particular diseases using the compounds.

Claim Strengths and Limitations

  • Independent Claims: Often focus on the chemically novel compounds or their specific methods of synthesis/usage. These define the broadest protection.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the protection by specifying particular substituents, dosages, or formulations.

Strengths: The patent’s claims are well-structured to cover a broad chemical space while providing fallback narrower claims. This enhances enforceability and reduces the risk of invalidation through prior art.

Limitations: The breadth of claims may face challenges if prior art discloses similar core structures. Moreover, therapeutic claims tend to be narrower due to legal standards requiring demonstration of efficacy and novelty.

Claim Language and Patentable Features

The claims explicitly specify novel structural motifs and their derivatives, including functional groups critical for activity. The detailed claim language ensures that minor structural modifications outside the scope are unlikely to infringe, although courts may scrutinize the actual scope during litigation.


Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding this patent reveals numerous prior art references, including:

  • Earlier patents on similar heterocyclic compounds and their use.
  • Publications describing analogs or related chemical classes.
  • Patent families filed internationally that protect similar inventions.

The landscape indicates a competitive space with overlapping claims and different strategies for patenting core structures or specific applications.

Competitor Patent Activity

Major pharmaceutical and biotech players likely pursued patent filings around the same chemical family, leading to a landscape characterized by overlapping claims, potential license negotiations, or freedom-to-operate analyses.

Patent Term and Life Cycle

Given its filing date (provisional application in 2004), the patent's expiration is expected around 2024-2025, assuming maintenance fees are properly paid and no extensions are granted. This timing impacts market exclusivity and generics entry.

Legal Challenges and Litigation

Although there are no publicly available records of litigation directly involving the '725 patent, companies should monitor for challenges such as:

  • Post-grant reviews or inter partes reviews.
  • Litigations concerning claim validity or infringement.

Farmacopeial and Regulatory Considerations

Protection granted by this patent complements regulatory exclusivities; however, patent expiration would intensify generic competition.


Implications for Innovation and Business Strategy

  • Patent enforcement: The well-defined claims provide leverage in infringement disputes.
  • Research and development: Recognizing the scope helps in designing next-generation molecules avoiding infringement.
  • Licensing and collaborations: The landscape suggests opportunities for licensing agreements or partnerships.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad compound and use claims provide comprehensive protection over the chemical class and their therapeutic applications.
  • It navigates the fine line between broad coverage and defensibility against prior art, optimizing safeguard against infringement and invalidation.
  • The patent landscape indicates a crowded field of similar compounds, requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Companies should monitor patent expiry timelines to strategize market entry or new patent filings.
  • Navigating this space warrants validity and infringement landscape analyses, considering overlapping patent rights and potential licensing pathways.

FAQs

  1. What is the main innovation of U.S. Patent 7,491,725?
    The patent discloses novel chemical compounds with specific structural motifs designed for therapeutic applications, along with their synthesis and use in treatment methods.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    The claims cover a wide class of structurally related compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of use, though specific derivatives are addressed through dependent claims.

  3. What is the significance of this patent in the pharmaceutical landscape?
    It grants market exclusivity for certain compounds targeting specific diseases, influencing drug development pipelines and competitive positioning.

  4. Can this patent be circumvented?
    Potentially, yes. Small structural modifications outside the scope of explicit claims could avoid infringement, but careful analysis of prior art is essential.

  5. When will this patent expire, and what does that mean for competitors?
    Expected expiration around 2024-2025, after which generic or biosimilar products may enter the market, increasing competition.


Sources

  1. U.S. Patent No. 7,491,725.
  2. Patent document analysis and legal commentaries.
  3. Patent landscape reports and prior art references.
  4. FDA and regulatory filing data related to the patent’s applications.

Disclaimer: This analysis provides an overview based on publicly available patent data and should not substitute legal advice. For comprehensive patent strategy, consult a qualified patent attorney.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,491,725

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Bristol Myers Squibb SPRYCEL dasatinib TABLET;ORAL 021986-001 Jun 28, 2006 AB RX Yes No 7,491,725*PED ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Bristol Myers Squibb SPRYCEL dasatinib TABLET;ORAL 021986-002 Jun 28, 2006 AB RX Yes No 7,491,725*PED ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Bristol Myers Squibb SPRYCEL dasatinib TABLET;ORAL 021986-003 Jun 28, 2006 AB RX Yes No 7,491,725*PED ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Bristol Myers Squibb SPRYCEL dasatinib TABLET;ORAL 021986-005 Oct 28, 2010 AB RX Yes No 7,491,725*PED ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.