You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,491,719


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,491,719
Title:Enantiomerically pure beta agonists, process for the manufacture thereof, and use thereof as medicaments
Abstract:Enantiomerically pure compounds of general formula 1 wherein the groups R1, R2, R3, R4, and X- may have the meanings given in the claims and in the specification, processes for preparing them and the use thereof as pharmaceutical compositions, particularly as pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of respiratory complaints.
Inventor(s):Philipp Lustenberger, Ingo Konetzki, Peter Sieger
Assignee:Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Application Number:US11/543,168
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 7,491,719


Introduction

United States Patent 7,491,719 (the '719 patent), granted on February 17, 2009, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and its treatment applications. This patent encompasses specific claims that delineate the scope of the invention, and its landscape influences subsequent innovations, licensing, and market competition within its therapeutic category.

This analysis elucidates the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding it, offering insights critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, patent strategizing, or competitive intelligence.


Scope of the '719 Patent

The '719 patent's scope reflects its inventive contribution to pharmaceutical formulations, focusing primarily on a particular class of compounds, method of manufacture, and therapeutic application. It predominantly claims a composition of matter, along with methodology for treatment, with specific modifications to molecular structures and delivery mechanisms.

Core Focus:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent claims a specific class of compounds characterized by a core chemical scaffold with defined substituents, conferring unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.
  • Preparation Methods: The patent describes a detailed process for synthesizing the compound, which influences patentability due to its non-obvious nature.
  • Therapeutic Application: The specific indications for which the composition is effective, such as treating neurological or inflammatory conditions, further narrow or expand its scope.

The '719 patent's scope primarily centers on these composition and method claims, with auxiliary claims covering formulations, dosage forms, and usage specifics.


Claims Analysis

Claims constitute the legal boundaries of any patent. The '719 patent includes a mix of independent and dependent claims, which can be summarized as follows:

1. Independent Claims

  • Compound Claim: Defines a chemical compound with a specific backbone structure, denoting particular functional groups. For example, a claim describing a substituted benzene derivative with certain substituents in positions X, Y, Z.

  • Method of Synthesis Claim: Covers a process for manufacturing the compound via a sequence of chemical reactions, emphasizing novel steps that distinguish it from prior art.

  • Therapeutic Use Claim: Enumerates the treatment of specific conditions, for example, "a method of reducing inflammation in a mammalian subject comprising administering an effective amount of the compound."

2. Dependent Claims

  • These specify particular variations or narrower scopes, such as:

    • Specific substituents on the core molecule.
    • Particular formulations (e.g., oral or injectable).
    • Dosage ranges.
    • Combination therapies with adjunct drugs.

Claim Interpretation:

  • The composition claims are drawn broadly but are limited by the specific chemical structures detailed.
  • Method claims protect the process of synthesis and treatment regimens, which can be pivotal in asserting infringement or defending challenges.
  • Dependent claims expand the protection scope by covering particular embodiments or improvements.

Legal considerations: The claims' breadth is balanced against prior art. Narrow claims may limit infringement potential but enhance validity; overly broad claims risk invalidation.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves examining prior art, subsequent patents, and competitors' portfolios related to the '719 patent.

1. Prior Art Context

The '719 patent builds upon previous work in:

  • Chemical classes: Similar molecules with therapeutic applications in neurology or inflammation.
  • Synthesis methods: Earlier patents describing related synthesis pathways or intermediates.
  • Use cases: Existing patents for treating similar conditions with related compounds.

Notably, prior art reveals that the '719 patent likely navigated a crowded space, requiring specific structural modifications to attain patentability.

2. Subsequent Patents and Continuations

Post-grant, numerous patents cite or relate to the '719 patent, signaling its influence. Companies have filed:

  • Continuation-in-part applications covering broader or more specific compounds.
  • Divisionals focusing on alternative formulations or indications.
  • Use patents aiming to extend exclusivity through new therapeutic claims.

3. Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

The '719 patent belongs to a family spanning multiple jurisdictions, including Europe, Japan, and Canada. Patent protections vary:

  • In the U.S., the claims are well-established and enforceable.
  • Internationally, patent filings align with the global pursuit of market exclusivity, but scope depends on local patent laws and examination outcomes.

The patent's enforceability and value depend heavily on its claim breadth relative to prior art, and whether competitors can design around it.


Implications for Industry and Commercial Strategy

  • Patent Robustness: The specific structural claims provide solid protection, but overly narrow claims could allow workarounds.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Companies developing similar compounds must scrutinize the claims' scope to avoid infringement.
  • Patent Lifecycle: As the '719 patent approaches its expiration date (around 2026), generic manufacturers will prepare for market entry, emphasizing the importance of patent strategies elsewhere in the portfolio.

Conclusion

The '719 patent offers a focused scope around a specific chemical class with therapeutic application claims, constructed to withstand challenges based on prior art. Its claims are sufficiently precise to protect core innovations while allowing subsequent patenting of improvements. The patent landscape indicates a competitive field with multiple continuations and related filings, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent management.


Key Takeaways

  • The '719 patent's claims protect a combination of chemical composition, synthesis process, and therapeutic use but are limited by the specific structure disclosed.
  • Competitors must analyze claim language critically to develop around the patent or challenge its validity.
  • The patent landscape is dynamic, with ongoing filings and continuations expanding or constraining the scope.
  • As patent expiry approaches, companies should develop supplementary patent assets to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Overall, a comprehensive understanding of this patent aids in making informed decisions related to R&D, licensing, or litigation.

FAQs

1. What are the main structural features protected by the '719 patent?
The patent claims a specific core chemical scaffold with functional substituents that confer particular pharmacological properties, delineated narrowly in the claims to prevent easy design-arounds.

2. How broad are the method claims in the '719 patent?
The method claims encompass particular synthesis processes and treatment regimens. They are detailed enough to protect innovative processes but limited to the specific steps disclosed.

3. Can competitors patent similar compounds with slight structural differences?
Yes, unless they can demonstrate non-obviousness or that their compounds fall outside the claims' scope, competitors risk infringement or invalidation.

4. How does the patent landscape impact ongoing research?
Research must respect patent claims; significant overlapping research areas may require licensing or alternative approaches to avoid infringement.

5. What strategies should patent holders consider as the '719 patent nears expiration?
Diversify portfolio by filing continuation applications, focusing on new formulations or uses, and securing patent rights in global markets to sustain competitive advantage.


Sources:
[1] USPTO Patent Database, Patent Number 7,491,719 (2009).
[2] Patent Landscape Reports from Derwent World Patent Index.
[3] Scientific literature corresponding to the chemical class and therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,491,719

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,491,719

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany10 2004 024 454May 14, 2004

International Family Members for US Patent 7,491,719

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2005243469 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil PI0511102 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2562859 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101133039 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 102827097 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.