Share This Page
Details for Patent: 7,491,719
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 7,491,719
| Title: | Enantiomerically pure beta agonists, process for the manufacture thereof, and use thereof as medicaments |
| Abstract: | Enantiomerically pure compounds of general formula 1 wherein the groups R1, R2, R3, R4, and X- may have the meanings given in the claims and in the specification, processes for preparing them and the use thereof as pharmaceutical compositions, particularly as pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of respiratory complaints. |
| Inventor(s): | Philipp Lustenberger, Ingo Konetzki, Peter Sieger |
| Assignee: | Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH |
| Application Number: | US11/543,168 |
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Compound; Composition; |
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | Analysis of United States Patent 7,491,719: DAA-containing Compositions and MethodsUnited States Patent 7,491,719, titled "DAA-CONTAINING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS," was granted on February 17, 2009, to Abbott Laboratories. The patent claims compositions and methods related to the use of a class of drugs known as direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. These DAAs target specific viral proteins essential for replication. The patent's claims are foundational to a significant segment of the Hepatitis C therapeutic market, focusing on combinations that enhance efficacy and reduce resistance. What Are the Core Claims of Patent 7,491,719?The patent's primary claims are directed towards specific pharmaceutical compositions and their use in treating HCV. The invention centers on combining a particular class of direct-acting antiviral agents with other therapeutic agents. Claim 1: Pharmaceutical CompositionsClaim 1, the broadest independent claim, defines a pharmaceutical composition. It specifies the inclusion of:
The patent details specific embodiments and preferred combinations. For instance, combinations with ribavirin are frequently discussed as a key aspect of the claimed invention. The patent also addresses dosages and administration methods within these compositions. Claim 2: Treatment MethodsClaim 2 pertains to a method of treating HCV infection in a human subject. This method involves administering:
This claim focuses on the practical application of the compositions described in Claim 1, outlining the therapeutic outcome of administering these drug combinations. Other Key ClaimsThe patent contains numerous dependent claims that further refine the scope of the invention. These include claims specifying:
The claims are structured to cover a broad spectrum of DAA-based therapies, particularly those involving combinations designed to achieve higher cure rates and overcome resistance mechanisms. What is the Technological Basis of the Invention?The technological innovation behind patent 7,491,719 lies in the identification and application of synergistic effects when certain DAAs are combined with other antiviral agents. Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs)The compounds of Formula (I) are direct-acting antivirals. Unlike older interferon-based therapies that broadly stimulate the immune system, DAAs target specific viral proteins that are essential for the HCV lifecycle. These targets include:
Patent 7,491,719 specifically claims compounds targeting viral proteases as its Formula (I) agents. Synergistic CombinationsThe core of the patent's value is the demonstrated or implied synergistic effect of combining DAAs with other agents. This synergy leads to:
The patent likely includes data or examples demonstrating these synergistic benefits, forming the basis for its broad claims on combination therapies. What is the Patent Landscape for Hepatitis C DAAs?The patent landscape for Hepatitis C DAAs is highly complex and competitive, characterized by numerous patents covering different drug compounds, formulations, and treatment regimens. Patent 7,491,719 occupies a significant position within this landscape due to its focus on combination therapies, which became the standard of care. Key Players and Patent FilingsMajor pharmaceutical companies have aggressively patented their DAA discoveries. Companies like Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Merck & Co., and Bristol Myers Squibb hold substantial portfolios of patents related to HCV DAAs. Abbott Laboratories, the assignee of patent 7,491,719, was a significant early player in this field. Overlapping Technologies and Patent ThicketsThe development of DAA regimens often involves combining drugs from different companies or using drugs that target distinct viral proteins. This creates "patent thickets" where multiple patents may need to be licensed for a single treatment regimen.
The expiration of key compound patents, coupled with the continued protection of method of use and formulation patents, influences market dynamics, particularly concerning generic entry. Impact of Patent 7,491,719Patent 7,491,719 is significant because it claims a fundamental aspect of modern HCV treatment: combination therapy using a DAA. Many highly successful pan-genotypic HCV treatment regimens utilize combinations that would likely fall under the broad scope of this patent, at least historically. The patent's validity and enforceability have been central to licensing discussions and potential litigation concerning the marketing of combination DAA therapies. Its expiration or the expiration of patents claiming the specific Formula (I) compounds would significantly impact the market for generic versions of treatments that rely on these combinations. What is the Status and Expiration of Patent 7,491,719?Understanding the patent's current status and expiration date is critical for assessing market opportunities and potential infringement risks. Original Grant Date
Term of PatentIn the United States, the term of a patent is generally 20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed. However, certain extensions may apply, such as Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) and Patent Term Extension (PTE) for pharmaceuticals, which can compensate for delays in patent issuance or regulatory review. Estimated Expiration DateAssuming no further extensions or adjustments beyond the standard 20-year term from filing, the patent's expiration can be calculated based on its filing date. While the patent grant date is February 17, 2009, the filing date of the parent application is the determinant for the 20-year term. For patent 7,491,719, the earliest claimed priority date is October 13, 2004 (U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/617,959). Therefore, the standard 20-year term from the earliest priority date would place the expiration around October 13, 2024. It is crucial for businesses to verify the exact expiration date through patent databases and consider any potential PTA or PTE that might have been granted, which could extend the term. Any litigation that might have affected the patent's term would also need to be factored in. What Are the Implications for Pharmaceutical Companies?The scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 7,491,719 have significant implications for pharmaceutical companies, particularly those involved in the development, manufacturing, and marketing of Hepatitis C therapies. Licensing and Freedom-to-OperateCompanies developing or marketing DAA-based HCV treatments must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses. This includes:
Generic Competition and Market EntryThe expiration of patent 7,491,719, and related patents covering specific DAA compounds, is a trigger for generic competition.
R&D Strategy and Portfolio ManagementThe existence of patents like 7,491,719 influences ongoing R&D strategies:
Litigation and Patent DisputesThe high commercial value of HCV treatments has historically led to significant patent litigation.
Key Takeaways
Frequently Asked QuestionsWhat specific DAA compounds are covered by Formula (I) in Patent 7,491,719?The patent defines Formula (I) structurally, representing a class of viral protease inhibitors. Specific named compounds within this class are often detailed in the patent's embodiments. For precise identification, direct examination of the patent's chemical structure definitions and examples is necessary. Can a generic drug manufacturer market a combination therapy if Patent 7,491,719 has expired but other related patents are still active?The ability to market a generic combination therapy depends on the status of all relevant patents. If other patents covering specific drug compounds within the combination, particular formulations, or other method-of-use aspects remain in force, a generic manufacturer may still face infringement issues and require licenses or successful patent challenges for those other patents. What is the difference between a compound patent and a method of use patent like 7,491,719?A compound patent protects the novel chemical entity itself. A method of use patent, such as 7,491,719, protects a specific application or use of a known or novel compound, in this case, combining it with other agents for treating HCV. Compound patents generally expire sooner than method of use patents might allow for extended market exclusivity if new uses are discovered and patented. Are there any known legal challenges to the validity of Patent 7,491,719?Information regarding specific legal challenges, such as invalidity lawsuits or administrative proceedings like Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs), would need to be accessed through specialized legal databases or patent litigation tracking services. Such challenges are common in the pharmaceutical industry for high-value patents. What are the implications of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) or Patent Term Extension (PTE) on the expiration of this patent?PTA is granted to compensate for delays by the USPTO during the patent prosecution process. PTE is available for pharmaceutical patents to recover some of the patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review period. If either of these was applied to patent 7,491,719, its expiration date would be later than the standard 20-year term from the filing date. Verification of any granted PTA or PTE is essential for determining the precise expiration date. Citations[1] Abbott Laboratories. (2009). United States Patent 7,491,719: DAA-CONTAINING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [2] U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/617,959. (Filed October 13, 2004). More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,491,719
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,491,719
| Foriegn Application Priority Data | ||
| Foreign Country | Foreign Patent Number | Foreign Patent Date |
| Germany | 10 2004 024 454 | May 14, 2004 |
International Family Members for US Patent 7,491,719
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2005243469 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Brazil | PI0511102 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Canada | 2562859 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| China | 101133039 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| China | 102827097 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| China | 106146425 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| China | 106995414 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
