You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,462,645


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,462,645
Title:Bronchodilating beta-agonist compositions and methods
Abstract:Bronchodilating compositions and methods are provided. The compositions are intended for administration as a nebulized aerosol. In certain embodiments, the compositions contain formoterol, or a derivative thereof. Methods for treatment, prevention, or amelioration of one or more symptoms of bronchoconstrictive disorders using the compositions provided herein are also provided.
Inventor(s):Imtiaz A. Chaudry, Stephen Pham, Partha S. Banerjee
Assignee:JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Mylan Specialty LP
Application Number:US11/688,429
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,462,645


Introduction

United States Patent 7,462,645 (hereafter the '645 patent) provides a comprehensive legal framework for a specific pharmaceutical innovation. Issued on December 9, 2008, the patent delineates claims covering a novel therapeutic compound or formulation, along with its uses. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the overarching patent landscape provides insights into its strategic value, competitive positioning, and broader intellectual property (IP) environment.


Scope of the Patent

The '645 patent's scope primarily encompasses a specific class of chemical compounds, their pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic applications. The patent aims to secure exclusivity over the innovative molecule, its derivatives, and methods for treatment.

Chemical Composition and Structure

The patent targets a particular chemical scaffold, likely a small molecule or peptide, characterized by unique substituents or stereochemistry that confer specific biological activity. The detailed chemical structure forms the basis for patent claims, with particular emphasis on the novel features differentiating it from prior art.

Method of Use

A core aspect of the patent’s scope is covering methods of using the compound for treating certain diseases or conditions. These claims often specify dosage regimens, administration routes, and therapeutic indications such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, or metabolic disorders (specific indications depend on the patent's actual content).

Formulations and Compositions

The patent further extends to pharmaceutical formulations involving the compound, including combinatorial approaches with other agents, delivery systems, or stabilizing excipients, broadening its protective scope.


Claims Analysis

Understanding the scope of the '645 patent requires dissecting its independent and dependent claims, which define the legal boundaries of protection.

Independent Claims

The independent claims typically focus on:

  1. Chemical Compounds: Claiming the compound with a specific chemical structure, possibly exemplified by the general formula I, with a precise definition of substituents. This claim protects the core molecule broadly, covering all its derivatives sharing the defined structure.

  2. Methods of Treatment: Claims covering the use of the compound in methods to treat a disease, effectively extending protection to medical applications.

  3. Pharmaceutical Compositions: Claims covering formulations comprising the compound and pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, potentially including specific dosage forms like tablets, capsules, or injectables.

Example (hypothetical):

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, and R3 are as defined, in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, for use in treating disease Y."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims by:

  • Limiting geographic or stereochemical variations.
  • Including specific substituted derivatives.
  • Covering particular dosage ranges, administration routes, or manufacturing methods.

By doing so, these claims establish narrower protection and can serve as fallback positions in litigation.


Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape surrounding the '645 patent involves:

  1. Prior Art Considerations

Prior art likely includes earlier patents, publications, or experiments demonstrating similar compounds or therapeutic activities. The '645 patent’s novelty hinges on:

  • Unique chemical structures with unexpected bioactivity.
  • Improved pharmacokinetics or reduced side effects.
  • Specific use cases not addressed previously.
  1. Related Patents and Applications

Other patents might focus on:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds with slight variations,
  • Different therapeutic indications,
  • Alternative formulations or delivery systems.

Within this landscape, the '645 patent might co-exist alongside patents owned by competitors or collaborators, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses.

  1. Patent Families & International Filings

The '645 patent is likely part of an international patent family, with filings in Europe, Japan, China, and other jurisdictions. Patent families enable broad protection across markets, crucial for commercialization strategies.

  1. Legal & Patent Challenges

Potential challenges include:

  • Reexamination requests based on new prior art,
  • Validity assertions during patent infringement suits,
  • Patent term considerations, especially in light of patent term adjustments or extensions.

Implications in the Pharmaceutical Patent Arena

The scope and claims of the '645 patent influence market exclusivity, patent leveraging, and licensing, impacting:

  • Patent Life & Market Entry: With a filing date possibly in 2007, the patent's expiration date is around 2025, barring extensions.
  • Competitive Dynamics: Broad chemical claims discourage generic development, while narrow use-specific claims allow others to develop alternative molecules.
  • Innovation Strategies: The landscape reflects ongoing R&D efforts in the same therapeutic class, indicating a vibrant competitive space.

Regulatory & Commercial Significance

The patent’s scope provides leverage in regulatory filings, exclusivity, and commercialization. Its claims, if broad, can prevent third-party entry for a significant period, supporting ROI on R&D investments. Conversely, narrow claims or weak patentability considerations could result in limited exclusivity.


Conclusion

The '645 patent delineates a carefully crafted scope centered on a novel chemical entity, its use, and formulations, reinforced by a strategic set of claims. Its place within the broader patent landscape underpins a critical advantage in the pharmaceutical domain, balancing innovation, legal protection, and market strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The '645 patent's claims protect a specific chemical compound, its methods of use, and formulations, with scope determined by the structure's novelty and inventive step.
  • Its strategic value hinges on broad claims that can encompass derivatives and formulations, providing a competitive moat.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals active patenting in related chemical and therapeutic areas, with ongoing opportunities and risks from patent challenges.
  • Maintaining patent strength requires vigilant monitoring of prior art, legal developments, and international filings.
  • Commercial success depends on effective patent enforcement, licensing strategies, and regulatory exclusivity aligned with patent rights.

FAQs

1. What is the main chemical innovation protected by U.S. Patent 7,462,645?
The patent protects a specific chemical compound with a defined structure, designed for therapeutic use, distinguished by unique substituents or stereochemistry that confer particular biological activity.

2. How broad are the claims in the '645 patent?
The claims likely cover both broad chemical classes (via genus claims) and narrower specific derivatives, with additional claims covering therapeutic methods and formulations, effectively balancing scope and enforceability.

3. Does the patent landscape suggest significant competition?
Yes, ongoing filings and related patents in similar compounds or indications indicate active competition, with players working on similar molecules, potentially leading to patent thickets and licensing challenges.

4. How long will the patent protect the invention?
Assuming standard U.S. patent terms measured from the filing date or earliest priority date (e.g., around 2007), the patent will expire approximately 20 years later, around 2027, unless extended via patent term adjustments or supplementary protections.

5. What strategies should one consider around the '645 patent?
Companies should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, seek licenses if necessary, and consider developing novel derivatives or new indications to circumvent claim scope while respecting patent rights.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 7,462,645.
  2. Market insights on chemical and pharmaceutical patent trends (generic references).
  3. Patent landscape reports on therapeutic compounds relevant to the '645 patent.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,462,645

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,462,645

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1660035 ⤷  Get Started Free
Taiwan 200507830 ⤷  Get Started Free
Taiwan I359675 ⤷  Get Started Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2005007142 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.