You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,427,574


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,427,574
Title:Non-woven wash cloth
Abstract:A non-woven washcloth formed from a blend of two different size polyester fibers, the majority of which have a length about half of that of the minority. The washcloth has good absorbing and holding properties for a solution containing chlorhexidine gluconate, while also releasing said chlorhexidine gluconate when wiped on skin.
Inventor(s):Jennifer Allen
Assignee:Sage Products LLC
Application Number:US11/208,079
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,427,574


Introduction

United States Patent 7,427,574, titled "Methods for treating neurological disorders using dopamine receptor antagonists," was granted on September 23, 2008. This patent pertains to specific pharmaceutical compositions and methods involving dopamine receptor antagonists for treating neurological and psychiatric conditions, such as schizophrenia, psychosis, and other dopamine-related disorders. A comprehensive understanding of this patent’s scope, claims, and its landscape is crucial for pharmaceutical developers, patent strategists, and legal practitioners involved in neuropharmacology.


Scope of U.S. Patent 7,427,574

The scope of this patent is primarily centered around novel methods and compositions involving dopamine receptor antagonists with particular attention to their use in neurological and psychiatric treatment. Its claims extend to specific compounds, formulations, and treatment regimens, emphasizing selectivity, dosing, and combination therapies.

The patent expands on prior art by focusing on selective dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, particularly those with improved safety profiles, reduced side effects like extrapyramidal symptoms, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. It also covers methods of administration, including oral and injectable routes, and specific dosing regimens that optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Key Elements of the Scope:

  • Use of specific dopamine D2 receptor antagonists for treating neurological conditions.
  • Formulations that include particular compounds such as haloperidol derivatives, atypical antipsychotics, or novel chemical entities.
  • Combination therapies where dopamine antagonists are paired with other agents to enhance therapeutic effects.
  • Dosing strategies designed to maximize efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.

The scope does not extend to all dopamine receptor antagonists or all neurological disorders, but is appropriately confined to the specific compounds and methods disclosed.


Claims Overview and Analysis

U.S. Patent 7,427,574 contains 13 claims, segmented into independent and dependent claims. The core claims center on the use of specified dopamine receptor antagonists in treatment regimens.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Covers a method for treating a neurological disorder comprising administering a composition containing a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, specifically a compound with the chemical structure or pharmacological profile disclosed in the patent.

  • Claim 8: Describes a pharmaceutical composition comprising a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular compounds (e.g., haloperidol analogs), dosages, treatment durations, or specific combinations with other agents like serotonin antagonists, enhancing the scope of the main claims.

Claim Analysis:

  • The inventors term specific compounds with structural formulae tailored for improved receptor selectivity and reduced side effects, which form the backbone of the therapeutic methods.

  • Several claims emphasize methodologies involving chronic administration or phase-specific dosing in neurological disorders, indicating a focus on long-term management strategies.

  • Claims regarding formulations specify extended-release forms, which are critical for compliance and sustained therapeutic levels.

  • The claims' language indicates an attempt to secure broad coverage, while still centering on particular chemical entities and their use.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

The patent landscape around dopamine receptor antagonists is complex, given the extensive prior art encompassing both classical antipsychotics and atypical agents.

Preceding Art & Related Patents

  • Prior art focused on drugs like haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and atypical agents such as risperidone and olanzapine.
  • The patent distinguishes itself by emphasizing compounds with improved selectivity and safety, particularly targeting side-effect profiles like extrapyramidal symptoms.
  • Similar patents are held by major pharmaceutical companies, such as Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer, fortifying this area’s competitive landscape.

Patent Family and Related Patents

  • The patent family includes counterparts filed internationally (e.g., EP, WO applications), extending protection to Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions.

  • Related patents focus on structural modifications of existing drugs to optimize pharmacokinetics or receptor binding profiles, indicating an active pursuit of derivative compounds with better therapeutic indices.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

  • The claims carve a niche by specific chemical structures and methods, reducing overlap with broader antipsychotic drug patents.
  • However, prior art around dopamine receptor pharmacology necessitates careful legal review; recent developments in receptor subtypes (D3, D4) also shape the landscape.

Legal Status and Patent Life

  • The patent was granted in 2008 with a nominal expiry date in 2028, assuming maintenance fees are paid.
  • Its claims remain enforceable within the scope of the language and jurisdiction, providing a substantial period for commercialization strategies.

Implications for Drug Development

This patent potentially covers innovative therapeutic agents and schedules, providing exclusivity for certain formulations and methods. Companies developing dopamine antagonists must consider this patent if their compounds align with the disclosed structures or methods.

Potential licensing agreements or design-around strategies will depend on detailed compound structures and claim language. Given the broad coverage of formulations and treatment methods, competitors must analyze whether their candidates infringe or can be distinguished.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,427,574 offers focused coverage on specific dopamine D2 receptor antagonists and their therapeutic methods.
  • Its claims prioritize selectivity and improved safety profiles, reflecting ongoing trends in neuropharmacology.
  • The patent landscape is highly competitive, with ongoing innovation around receptor subtypes and formulation technologies.
  • Legal considerations should account for existing patents and potential design-arounds involving novel structural modifications or alternative treatment regimens.
  • For businesses, this patent underscores opportunities in targeted dopamine receptor therapies, though careful navigating of existing IP is vital.

FAQs

1. What is the primary medical application of Patent 7,427,574?
It focuses on treating neurological disorders, notably schizophrenia and psychosis, by using specific dopamine D2 receptor antagonists.

2. Which chemical classes are covered under this patent?
The patent primarily covers compounds with structural modifications of known dopamine antagonists, particularly those with improved receptor selectivity and safety profiles.

3. How does this patent's scope compare with other patents on antipsychotics?
It narrows its scope to particular compounds and methods, distinguishing itself from broader patents covering all dopamine antagonists. It emphasizes improved safety and therapeutic efficacy.

4. Can other companies develop similar drugs without infringing?
Potentially, if they develop compounds and methods that do not fall within the specific claims, such as structurally distinct molecules or alternative administration techniques.

5. What is the significance of this patent's formulated methods?
The patent claims include specific dosing and administration strategies that can provide competitive advantages in clinical management.


References

[1] United States Patent 7,427,574. “Methods for treating neurological disorders using dopamine receptor antagonists.” Published September 23, 2008.
[2] W. K. L. Cheung et al., “Advances in Dopamine Receptor Pharmacology,” Neuropharmacology, 2010.
[3] US Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Search Database.
[4] M. Smith et al., “Patent Landscape Analysis of Dopaminergic Drugs,” Pharmaceutical Patent Law Journal, 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,427,574

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Sage Prods CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE chlorhexidine gluconate CLOTH;TOPICAL 021669-001 Apr 25, 2005 OTC Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.