Share This Page
Details for Patent: 7,384,980
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 7,384,980
| Title: | Derivatives of 3,3-diphenylpropylamines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | The invention concerns novel derivatives of 3,3-diphenylpropylamines, methods for their preparation, pharmaceutical compositions containing the novel compounds, and the use of the compounds for preparing drugs. More particularly, the invention relates to novel prodrugs of antimuscarinic agents with superior pharmacokinetic properties compared to existing drugs such as oxybutynin and tolterodine, methods for their preparation, pharmaceutical compositions containing them, a method of using said compounds and compositions for the treatment of urinary incontinence, gastrointestinal hyperactivity (irritable bowel syndrome) and other smooth muscle contractile conditions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Claus Meese, Bengt Sparf | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | UCB Pharma GmbH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US11/201,756 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: | See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,384,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Composition; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | United States Patent 7,384,980: Fesoterodine Scope, Claims, Expiration, and Patent LandscapeUS Patent 7,384,980 covers the R-(+)-enantiomer of fesoterodine, its acid-addition salts, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic use as a muscarinic receptor antagonist, including treatment of urinary incontinence. The patent issued June 10, 2008, and its ordinary U.S. patent term expired February 15, 2022. It is no longer an enforceable barrier to an ANDA applicant, although related formulation, salt, method-of-use, or manufacturing patents must be reviewed separately.[1][2] What compound does US 7,384,980 protect?The principal compound is fesoterodine, chemically identified in the patent as: R-(+)-isobutyric acid 2-(3-diisopropylamino-1-phenylpropyl)-4-hydroxymethylphenyl ester. Fesoterodine is a prodrug. In vivo, ester hydrolysis produces 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine, commonly called 5-HMT. The active metabolite antagonizes muscarinic receptors and is responsible for the pharmacologic effect in overactive bladder and urinary incontinence.[3] The marketed product is Toviaz, containing fesoterodine fumarate in extended-release tablets. The product was developed by Schwarz Pharma, later acquired by UCB, and commercialized in the United States by Pfizer under a commercialization arrangement.[3][4]
How broad are the claims of US 7,384,980?The claims divide into four principal categories: the R-enantiomer, salts, compositions, and methods of treatment. Claims 8 through 16 broaden the patent to a group of related ester compounds and their racemic or enantiomeric forms. Claims 1 and 2: R-fesoterodine and acid-addition saltsClaim 1 is a product claim directed to the R-(+)-enantiomer of fesoterodine. It does not claim the racemate. The stereochemical limitation is commercially important because the R-enantiomer is the form associated with the marketed active ingredient. Claim 2 covers salts of the R-enantiomer with a physiologically acceptable acid. Fesoterodine fumarate falls within the ordinary scope of this type of salt claim because fumaric acid is a physiologically acceptable acid and the marketed product is the fumarate salt. The claim structure therefore reaches both:
A generic product containing the same R-fesoterodine active moiety would not avoid the product claims merely by using a different pharmaceutically acceptable acid. Claims 3 and 10: pharmaceutical compositionsClaim 3 covers a composition containing an effective amount of R-fesoterodine or a physiologically acceptable acid-addition salt, together with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Claim 10 covers compositions containing any member of the listed compound group in claim 8. The composition claims are broader than the marketed product in one respect because they are not limited on their face to an extended-release tablet, a particular excipient, a particular dissolution profile, or a particular dose. The claims could therefore reach multiple dosage forms, including tablets, capsules, powders, and other conventional pharmaceutical compositions, provided the composition contains a claimed compound or salt. They do not, however, expressly claim the specific Toviaz extended-release technology. A competitor may need to assess separate formulation patents if it uses the same release profile, excipient architecture, coating system, or manufacturing process. Claims 4 and 5: muscarinic antagonism and treatmentClaim 4 is a method claim requiring administration of R-fesoterodine or a salt, resulting in contact between the muscarinic receptor and an effective amount of R-2-(3-diisopropylamino-1-phenylpropyl)-4-hydroxymethylphenol, the active 5-HMT metabolite. This claim links the prodrug administration step to the active metabolite's receptor interaction. Claim 5 covers treatment of a disease in a mammal that is amenable to treatment through muscarinic receptor antagonism. These claims are not limited to urinary incontinence. Their language potentially encompasses a broader set of muscarinic-mediated disorders, subject to ordinary requirements for claim construction, enablement, written description, and proof of infringement. Claims 6, 7, 15, and 16: urinary incontinence and human treatmentClaims 6 and 7 narrow the treatment method to urinary incontinence in a human patient. Claims 15 and 16 provide a parallel urinary-incontinence limitation for the broader compound group in claim 12. These claims are the closest claims to the commercial indication for Toviaz. A generic applicant filing for fesoterodine fumarate extended-release tablets would typically address method-of-use patents through a Paragraph IV certification, a section viii statement, labeling restrictions, or a combination of those mechanisms, depending on the listed patent and the approved indication. What compounds are covered by claims 8 through 16?Claims 8 through 16 extend beyond the single R-fesoterodine compound. They cover a defined group of ester analogs sharing the 3-diisopropylamino-1-phenylpropyl phenyl core. The listed compounds include:
Claim 8 expressly includes racemic mixtures and individual enantiomers, as well as physiologically acceptable salts. Claim 9 narrows the group to four hydroxy-methylphenyl ester derivatives:
Claims 10 and 12 apply the composition and treatment limitations to the broader group. Claims 11 and 13 narrow those claims to the four compounds identified in claim 9. The analytical significance is that claims 8 through 16 are genus and Markush-style claims. They potentially cover compounds other than fesoterodine, but their practical value depends on whether the listed alternatives are adequately supported by the specification and whether a marketed product falls within the precise structural language. What is the scope of the urinary-incontinence claims?The urinary-incontinence claims cover administering a claimed ester or salt in a pharmaceutical composition to a mammal, with claims 7 and 16 limiting the patient to a human. The claims are not expressly limited to:
That breadth would have made the claims relevant to a broad generic product targeting the approved urinary-incontinence indication during the patent term. Following expiration, the claims no longer create a current U.S. patent exclusion, but they remain relevant to historical Paragraph IV litigation and patent-term analysis. When did US 7,384,980 lose exclusivity?US 7,384,980 expired on February 15, 2022, based on the patent term reflected in FDA and patent records.[1][2]
Patent expiration does not necessarily mark the end of all market protection for the product. A product may retain other patents, regulatory exclusivity, pediatric exclusivity, or commercial protection. For Toviaz, the central active-ingredient and enantiomer protection is no longer available as a current patent barrier. What is the Orange Book status of fesoterodine?Fesoterodine fumarate is an FDA-approved small-molecule drug listed in the Orange Book as an approved prescription product. Toviaz is approved as an extended-release tablet for symptoms of overactive bladder, including urge urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency.[3] The Orange Book analysis should distinguish among:
Because US 7,384,980 has expired, it no longer supports a valid Paragraph IV litigation strategy by itself. A current ANDA applicant's risk depends on whether an unexpired related patent remains listed against the relevant reference product and whether the proposed label overlaps the patented use. FDA Orange Book records should be reviewed as of the relevant filing or launch date because listed patent status, delisting, and expiration information can change.[1] Which companies challenged the Toviaz patent estate?The Toviaz generic market has involved ANDA-based competition rather than biosimilar competition. Public records associate generic fesoterodine development with multiple generic manufacturers, including Teva and other ANDA sponsors. The principal legal issues for an ANDA applicant would have included:
The expiration of US 7,384,980 materially changes the litigation posture. Any historical Paragraph IV action based solely on this patent no longer creates a prospective injunction against launch after expiration. What Paragraph IV risks existed for fesoterodine generics?During the patent term, an ANDA applicant seeking approval for a product containing fesoterodine fumarate could have certified under Paragraph IV that the patent was invalid, unenforceable, or would not be infringed. A Paragraph IV notice involving US 7,384,980 could have triggered:
The practical risk was highest for a product using the same R-enantiomer and fumarate salt. A different ester analog might avoid claims 1 through 7 but could remain exposed to claims 8 through 16. Are biosimilars relevant to US 7,384,980?No. Fesoterodine is a chemically synthesized small molecule, not a biologic. Competitors use the ANDA pathway under section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, not the biosimilar pathway under the Public Health Service Act. The relevant competitive issues are generic equivalence, salt identity, release characteristics, labeling, and patent certification. Biosimilar interchangeability, reference-product exclusivity, and biologic patent dance procedures do not apply. What formulation patents protect Toviaz?US 7,384,980 is not a detailed extended-release formulation patent. Its composition claims require a claimed active compound or salt and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, but they do not specify the commercial release system. Toviaz's commercial presentation is an extended-release tablet. A complete freedom-to-operate review should therefore examine separate patent families covering:
Those families may have different expiration dates from US 7,384,980. They may also have been filed later and carry patent terms extending beyond the 2022 expiration date of the enantiomer patent. How strong was the patent estate?The estate was strongest against a product that copied all commercial attributes of Toviaz during the patent term:
US 7,384,980 had meaningful claim breadth because it combined a specific enantiomer claim with salt, composition, and method claims. Claims 8 through 16 provided additional chemical coverage but also created potential validity pressure because they covered a larger group of related compounds.
How does US 7,384,980 compare with the broader fesoterodine patent landscape?US 7,384,980 is an enantiomer and therapeutic-use patent. It should not be treated as the entire Toviaz estate. The broader landscape can be divided into five layers:
The commercial product can be exposed to more than one layer at the same time. Expiration of the core enantiomer patent removes one barrier but does not automatically invalidate or expire other patents. What generic launch scenarios exist for fesoterodine?Launch after expiration of the core compound patentThis is the lowest-risk scenario if no related formulation or use patent remains enforceable. An ANDA applicant may market an equivalent fesoterodine fumarate extended-release product after FDA approval and completion of applicable exclusivity requirements. Launch with a Paragraph IV challengeBefore expiration, an applicant could challenge listed patents by alleging invalidity, unenforceability, or noninfringement. A successful challenge could support an earlier launch. The risk would include a 30-month stay and district-court litigation. Launch with a section viii statementIf a listed patent covered only a use that the generic applicant could omit from its labeling, the applicant could seek approval for unpatented indications. This strategy depends on the exact Orange Book listing and whether the remaining label still induces infringement. At-risk launchAn applicant could launch before resolution of litigation if it accepted potential damages and injunction exposure. That scenario is commercially less relevant for US 7,384,980 because the patent has expired. What licensing and settlement issues affect fesoterodine?The relevant commercial rights have involved the originator, development partner, NDA holder, and generic manufacturers. Licensing and settlement agreements may have established:
Settlement agreements in Hatch-Waxman cases are often not fully public. The enforceability and commercial significance of any particular agreement must be tied to the parties, patent numbers, launch date, and FDA approval status. US 7,384,980 itself does not create a current licensing requirement because it expired in 2022. What geographic coverage does the patent have?US 7,384,980 provides rights only in the United States. Equivalent protection may have existed in other jurisdictions through related national patent filings, but foreign expiration dates, claim scope, opposition outcomes, and supplementary protection certificates must be assessed country by country. The U.S. expiration does not determine:
A global launch assessment therefore requires a separate family-level review. Key Takeaways
FAQsIs fesoterodine fumarate covered by US Patent 7,384,980?Yes. Claim 2 covers salts of R-fesoterodine with physiologically acceptable acids, and fesoterodine fumarate is an acid-addition salt of the claimed R-enantiomer. Can a generic manufacturer avoid the patent by using racemic fesoterodine?During the patent term, a racemate could have raised a different infringement analysis for claims 1 through 7, but claims 8 through 16 expressly include racemic mixtures and individual enantiomers of listed compounds. The patent expired in 2022. Does US 7,384,980 cover the Toviaz extended-release mechanism?Not specifically. The patent claims compositions broadly but does not recite the detailed release technology of the marketed extended-release tablet. Separate formulation patents may have applied. Is 5-HMT itself the compound claimed in US 7,384,980?No. The patent primarily claims fesoterodine and related ester compounds. Claim 4 refers to receptor contact with 5-HMT after administration of fesoterodine or its salt. Does expiration of US 7,384,980 permit immediate generic launch?It removes this patent as a current barrier, but FDA approval, regulatory exclusivity, other Orange Book patents, formulation rights, and any settlement restrictions must still be assessed for the specific generic product. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,384,980
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,384,980
| Foriegn Application Priority Data | ||
| Foreign Country | Foreign Patent Number | Foreign Patent Date |
| 98108608 | May 12, 1998 | |
International Family Members for US Patent 7,384,980
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European Patent Office | 1077912 | ⤷ Start Trial | CA 2007 00046 | Denmark | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 1077912 | ⤷ Start Trial | 91365 | Luxembourg | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 1077912 | ⤷ Start Trial | 07C0050 | France | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 1077912 | ⤷ Start Trial | SPC037/2007 | Ireland | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 1077912 | ⤷ Start Trial | SPC/GB07/053 | United Kingdom | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 1077912 | ⤷ Start Trial | SZ 47/2007 | Austria | ⤷ Start Trial |
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
