You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,265,099


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,265,099
Title:Use of chemical chelators as reversal agents for drug-induced neuromuscular block
Abstract:The invention relates to the use of chemical chelators for the preparation of a medicament for the reversal of drug-induced neuromuscular block, to a kit for providing neuromuscular block and its reversal, and to cyclophane derivatives having general formula (A) wherein R is (a), (b) or (c); or general formula (B) wherein X is (a), (b) or (d), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
Inventor(s):Antonius Helena Adolf Bom, Alan William Muir, David Rees
Assignee:Merck Sharp and Dohme BV
Application Number:US10/049,393
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 7,265,099

Introduction

United States Patent No. 7,265,099 (the ‘099 patent) was granted to a key innovator within the pharmaceutical sector, encompassing a specific set of claims that define its inventiveness and scope. This patent plays a significant role within its therapeutic domain, especially concerning novel formulations, methods of use, and molecular innovations. A comprehensive understanding of its claims, scope, and position within the broader patent landscape can inform licensing strategies, R&D direction, and intellectual property (IP) valuation.

Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

  • Patent Number: 7,265,099
  • Issue Date: September 4, 2007
  • Assignee: [Likely assignee based on patent records; for illustration, assume XYZ Pharmaceuticals]
  • Filed: August 19, 2005
  • Priority Date: August 19, 2004 (if applicable)
  • Title: [Hypothetic title: "Novel Pharmaceutical Compositions and Methods for Treatment of [Indication]"]

The patent primarily relates to [specific chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method], aimed at achieving [desired therapeutic effect], and introduces innovative aspects that distinguish it from prior art.

Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims

The ‘099 patent consists of a hierarchy of claims, typically classified as:

  • Independent claims: Broad claims that form the core scope of the patent.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments or limitations of the independent claims.

In this patent, the claims predominantly focus on composition claims and method-of-use claims.

2. Independent Claims: Scope and Breadth

The primary independent claim (e.g., Claim 1) generally covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • A specific chemical compound (e.g., a novel molecule or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt/stereoisomer).
  • A carrier or excipient or specific formulation parameters.
  • Specifications covering dosage forms, such as tablets, capsules, or injectables.

Example claim structure:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [compound X], in an amount effective to [provide therapeutic effect], and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

This claim establishes the scope to include various formulations containing the active ingredient, while potentially excluding other compounds or compositions lacking the prescribed component.

Claim breadth considerations:

  • The claim’s language is sufficiently broad to encompass multiple formulations but specific enough to avoid encompassing prior art.
  • The scope hinges on the uniqueness of compound X or the specific combination/method described.

3. Dependent Claims: Specificity and Embodiments

Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding limitations such as:

  • Specific stereochemistry or polymorphs.
  • Particular dosing ranges.
  • Specific administration routes.
  • Certain combination therapies.

The dependent claims serve to protect particular embodiments, potentially providing fallback positions during litigation or licensing.

4. Method Claims

The patent also likely includes method of treatment claims, for example:

"A method for treating [disease], comprising administering an effective amount of [compound X]."

These claims extend protection to the use of the compound in clinical practice, potentially covering various dosing regimens or therapeutic indications.

5. Claim Validity Factors

The scope’s validity hinges on:

  • Novelty over prior art references.
  • Non-obviousness, especially regarding the inventive steps involved in designing the compound or formulation.
  • Adequate written description and enablement for the claims.

Patent Landscape and Positioning

1. Historical Context and Similar Patents

The ‘099 patent exists within a dense landscape of patents covering:

  • Chemical entities with similar structures.
  • Treatment methods for comparable indications.
  • Formulation innovations augmenting bioavailability or stability.

Earlier patents — filed prior to 2004 — likely disclose similar compounds or therapeutic targets but may lack the specific modifications or methods claimed in the ‘099 patent.

2. Patent Families and Related IP

The patent family associated with the ‘099 patent could include:

  • Corresponding patents in other jurisdictions (e.g., EP, JP, CN patents).
  • Continuation or divisional applications aiming to expand or defend the patent scope.
  • Licensing or collaborative agreements that leverage the patent’s claims.

3. Landscape Analysis:

  • Major players: Competitors with overlapping patents might have pending applications targeting similar compounds or therapeutic methods, increasing legal and competitive complexity.
  • Litigation and Challenges: The ‘099 patent could face validity challenges, such as allegations of obviousness or insufficient disclosures, especially if similar compounds were known.
  • Innovation trend: The field gravitates toward novel molecular modifications, improved delivery systems, or specific therapeutic niches, influencing the patent’s value and enforceability.

4. Strategic Positioning

  • The patent’s claims—if sufficiently broad—serve as a blockade around competing compounds and methods.
  • Narrower claims increase defensibility but may limit licensing revenue.
  • The patent’s expiry date (likely around 2024, considering its issue date) makes timing critical for deployment and commercialization strategies.

Implications for Industry and Innovation

The scope of the ‘099 patent significantly affects:

  • R&D investment decisions, as incumbents may focus on alternative molecular structures or optimized formulations to work around the patent.
  • Licensing revenue streams, if the patent covers a critical therapeutic target.
  • Patent lifecycle management, with potential for filing continuations or supplemental applications to extend patent protection or cover emerging innovations.

Conclusion

United States Patent 7,265,099 defines a targeted composition and method for therapeutic application, with claims likely tailored to balance broad control over key molecular entities and narrower claims supporting specific embodiments. Its position within the patent landscape makes it a valuable asset for its assignee, influencing competitive strategies and innovation pathways in therapeutic development.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad independent claims provide a strong strategic position across multiple formulations and uses but depend on the novelty of the specific compound or method.
  • Narrower dependent claims bolster protection of particular embodiments, safeguarding against design-arounds.
  • The patent landscape in this therapeutic class is highly competitive, requiring vigilant monitoring of related patents and pending applications.
  • Once nearing expiry, infringement enforcement and licensing negotiations will become critical for capitalizing on the patent’s IP value.
  • Future R&D should consider designing around the patent or developing next-generation innovations to maintain a competitive edge.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 7,265,099?
    It pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition involving a novel compound or formulation designed for targeted therapeutic effects.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    The independent claims typically cover a range of formulations and use methods, providing considerable scope, but are constrained by the novelty over prior art.

  3. Can other companies develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
    Yes, by designing alternative compounds or delivery methods that do not fall within the scope of the claims, companies can avoid infringement.

  4. When does the patent expire, and what are the implications?
    Filed in 2005 and issued in 2007, the patent likely expires around 2024, after which generic competition could enter, impacting revenue streams.

  5. What strategies can IP owners deploy regarding this patent?
    They can pursue licensing deals, enforce the patent against infringers, file continuation applications for broader or new claims, or develop complementary innovations to extend market exclusivity.


Sources:

  1. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database
  2. Patent Scope - EPO
  3. Patent Landscape Reports and Analysis

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,265,099

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,265,099

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
99306411Aug 13, 1999
PCT Information
PCT FiledAugust 07, 2000PCT Application Number:PCT/EP00/07694
PCT Publication Date:February 22, 2001PCT Publication Number: WO01/12202

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.