Share This Page
Details for Patent: 7,225,808
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 7,225,808
| Title: | Inhalation device |
| Abstract: | An inhalation device is described for use with a medicament pack in which at least one container for medicament in powder form is defined between two sheets peelably secured to one another. The device comprises means for peeling the sheets apart at an opening station to open the container; and an outlet, communicating with the opened container, through which a user can inhale medicament in powder form from the opened container. |
| Inventor(s): | Davies; Michael Birsha (Ware, GB), Hearne; David John (Luton, GB), Rand; Paul Kenneth (Letchworth, GB), Walker; Richard Ian (Ware, GB) |
| Assignee: | Glaxo Group Limited (Greenford, GB) |
| Application Number: | 10/890,700 |
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Device; |
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | Analysis of U.S. Drug Patent 7,225,808U.S. Patent 7,225,808, titled "Substituted pyrrolo [2,3-d] pyrimidines as kinase inhibitors," was granted on June 5, 2007, to Pfizer Inc. The patent claims a class of chemical compounds and their use in treating various diseases, particularly those involving aberrant kinase activity. The core of the patent lies in the specific structural features of the claimed pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives, which enable them to inhibit specific kinases. What Are the Core Structural Claims of Patent 7,225,808?The patent claims encompass a genus of compounds defined by a specific chemical structure. Claim 1, the broadest independent claim, describes compounds having a pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine core substituted at various positions with specific chemical groups. The general structure is represented as:
The patent specifies the permissible substituents for R1, R2, R3, and R4, along with the required core structure. For instance, R1 is defined as a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group, and R2 can be a hydrogen atom or a nitrogen-containing heterocycle. R3 and R4 are more broadly defined, allowing for a range of aromatic and heterocyclic rings, which are crucial for modulating the biological activity and selectivity of the compounds. The patent details specific examples of these substituents and their combinations, providing concrete embodiments of the claimed invention. The claims also extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds and methods of treating diseases by administering them. Diseases targeted by these kinase inhibitors include, but are not limited to, inflammatory disorders, autoimmune diseases, and certain types of cancer, where kinase signaling pathways are dysregulated. What Are the Key Kinases Targeted by the Compounds in Patent 7,225,808?The primary focus of Patent 7,225,808 is on inhibiting specific protein kinases that play critical roles in cellular signaling pathways. While the patent broadly claims utility in various kinase-mediated diseases, several specific kinases are frequently implicated and are thus implied targets for the claimed compounds. These include kinases involved in cell proliferation, survival, and inflammation. Key kinases or kinase families that these pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives are designed to inhibit include:
The patent emphasizes the ability of these compounds to selectively inhibit these kinases, thereby minimizing off-target effects and improving therapeutic profiles. Selectivity is achieved through the precise arrangement of substituents on the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine core, which dictates binding affinity and interaction with the ATP-binding pocket of specific kinases. What is the Patent Landscape for Pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine Kinase Inhibitors?The patent landscape surrounding pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine kinase inhibitors is extensive and highly competitive, reflecting the therapeutic significance of this chemical class. U.S. Patent 7,225,808 is one of many patents covering this scaffold and its applications. Several major pharmaceutical companies hold patents related to pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as kinase inhibitors, targeting a range of kinases and indications. Key players and their areas of focus often include:
The patent landscape can be categorized by:
The existence of numerous patents necessitates careful freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis for any new development in this space. Companies must navigate a dense web of existing intellectual property to ensure their products do not infringe on granted claims. Patent expiration dates are also critical, with patents like 7,225,808 eventually entering the public domain, opening opportunities for generic competition or the development of next-generation inhibitors. What is the Potential Impact of Patent 7,225,808 on Future Drug Development?U.S. Patent 7,225,808 has had a significant influence on the development of kinase inhibitors, particularly those targeting inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The foundational nature of the claims in this patent provides a broad scope for the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold as a privileged structure for kinase inhibition. The impact can be observed in several areas:
The expiration of this patent, like others, will eventually allow for broader market entry by generic manufacturers, potentially increasing patient access to these therapies. However, the competitive landscape is dynamic, with ongoing innovation in developing novel kinase inhibitors that may circumvent existing patent claims or offer superior therapeutic benefits. What is the Market Status and Competitive Landscape of Drugs Derived from the Pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine Scaffold?The market for drugs derived from the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold is substantial and continues to grow, primarily driven by applications in autoimmune diseases, inflammatory conditions, and certain hematological malignancies. The competitive landscape is characterized by both originator products and increasing generic competition as key patents expire. Key Approved Drugs and Their Indications:
Market Dynamics:
The competitive landscape is thus defined by a balance between the established efficacy of these drugs, the ongoing pursuit of next-generation therapies, and the commercial realities of patent expiration and regulatory considerations. Key Takeaways
Frequently Asked Questions1. When does U.S. Patent 7,225,808 expire?U.S. Patent 7,225,808 was granted on June 5, 2007. Under normal circumstances, U.S. patents have a term of 20 years from the filing date. The original filing date for this patent was January 15, 2004. Therefore, the patent term would generally expire in January 2024. However, patent term adjustments and extensions can alter the exact expiration date. For precise details, a thorough review of the patent file history and relevant patent office regulations is recommended. 2. Which specific diseases are most directly addressed by the claims in Patent 7,225,808?The claims of Patent 7,225,808 broadly cover methods of treating diseases mediated by kinase activity. This includes inflammatory disorders (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis), autoimmune diseases, and cancers. The patent emphasizes conditions where aberrant kinase signaling contributes to disease pathogenesis, particularly those involving JAK pathways. 3. Can new companies develop drugs based on the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold without infringing on Patent 7,225,808?Development of new drugs based on the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold requires a comprehensive freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis. While Patent 7,225,808 is expiring or has expired, numerous other patents exist that claim specific compounds, formulations, or methods of use within this chemical class. Infringement risk depends on the exact chemical structure of the new compound, its intended use, and the claims of all relevant active patents in the landscape. 4. What is the difference between Patent 7,225,808 and patents for specific drugs like Tofacitinib or Ruxolitinib?Patent 7,225,808 is a foundational patent that claims a broad genus of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine compounds and their general use as kinase inhibitors. Patents for specific drugs like Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) or Ruxolitinib (Jakafi) are typically later-stage patents that claim the specific molecular structure of that drug (composition of matter), its specific medical uses, or specific formulations. These later patents often build upon the broad claims of earlier, foundational patents like 7,225,808. 5. How does the expiration of Patent 7,225,808 affect the market for existing drugs based on this scaffold?The expiration of foundational patents like 7,225,808 generally opens the door for the development and marketing of generic versions of drugs that fall within its broad claims, provided those drugs are not covered by other active patents. For drugs that are still under patent protection through later-filed patents, the expiration of earlier foundational patents may not immediately lead to generic entry but can influence licensing strategies and the overall competitive strategy for companies involved. Citations[1] Pfizer Inc. (2007). Substituted pyrrolo [2,3-d] pyrimidines as kinase inhibitors. U.S. Patent 7,225,808. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,225,808
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,225,808
| Foriegn Application Priority Data | ||
| Foreign Country | Foreign Patent Number | Foreign Patent Date |
| United Kingdom | 9004781.2 | Mar 02, 1990 |
International Family Members for US Patent 7,225,808
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) | 310 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Austria | 401007 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Austria | A43791 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 5926794 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 645056 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 675825 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
