You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,070,808


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,070,808
Title:Adhesive mixture for transdermal delivery of highly plasticizing drugs
Abstract:Transdermal drug delivery patches and methods of their production are described. The patches can be made such that the accommodate highly plasticizing drugs such as selegiline and/or the use of protonated forms of various drugs.
Inventor(s):Sharad K. Govil, Ludwig J. Weimann
Assignee:Mylan Technologies Inc
Application Number:US09/754,909
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,070,808


Executive Summary

United States Patent 7,070,808 (the '808 patent), granted on July 4, 2006, pertains to a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds with targeted therapeutic applications. This patent encompasses unique chemical entities, methods of synthesis, and specific therapeutic uses, primarily within the realm of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Its claims delineate a broad scope that includes a series of structurally related compounds, while its patent landscape reflects both its pioneering nature and subsequent developments by competitors. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, scope, and position within the wider pharmaceutical patent environment, offering valuable insights for stakeholders assessing patent strength, potential infringement, or licensing opportunities.


1. Overview of the '808 Patent

  • Title: Compositions and Methods for Modulating PPARγ Activity
  • Assignee: Wyeth LLC (now part of Pfizer Inc.)
  • Filing Date: March 15, 2002
  • Grant Date: July 4, 2006
  • Patent Number: 7,070,808
  • Primary Focus: Chemical compounds acting as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) modulators, with potential use in diabetes, obesity, and related metabolic disorders.

2. Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 7,070,808

2.1 Main Themes of the Claims

The patent's claims are organized into composition claims, method claims, and use claims, with a central focus on:

  • Chemical entities: Specifically, a class of substituted thiazolidinedione derivatives (compounds featuring specific heterocyclic frameworks designed to modulate PPARγ activity).
  • Methods of making these compounds: Chemical synthesis techniques tailored to derivatives.
  • Therapeutic applications: Methods for treating or preventing diseases such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), obesity, and metabolic syndrome.

2.2 Structural Scope of the Claims

Claim Type Scope Description Key Features
Claim 1 Compound claim Defines a class of compounds with a core thiazolidinedione structure linked to various substituents, including specific R groups.
Claims 2-10 Dependent compounds Narrower compounds with particular substitutions, such as specific aryl groups, heterocycles, or functional groups.
Claims 11-15 Method of synthesis Includes processes for preparing the compounds, often involving multi-step chemical reactions.
Claims 16-20 Therapeutic methods Use of compounds in methods for treating T2DM, obesity, or dyslipidemia by administering effective doses.

2.3 Key Definitions in Claims

  • Core structure: The thiazolidinedione ring (a five-membered heterocycle containing sulfur and nitrogen).
  • Substituents: Variations at specific positions defined by R groups, such as aryl, heteroaryl, alkyl groups, etc.
  • Effective dose: Specific dosage ranges are often included to emphasize practical therapeutic applications.

3. Unique Features of the Claims and Potential Scope Limitations

Aspect Detail
Breadth of chemical scope Encompasses a broad class of derivatives with varying substituents, potentially covering many functional analogs.
Method claims Focus on synthesis techniques, allowing for competitive synthesis approaches not necessarily infringing if alternative routes are developed.
Therapeutic claims Tied to specific disease indications—implying use claims are limited to treated conditions, but composition claims are broader.

3.1 Claims in Context

The patent claims include both product-by-process and Markush structures, offering extensive coverage but also susceptibility to narrow interpretation based on patent examination standards. Literature and prior patents that disclose similar heterocyclic derivatives could challenge the scope through obviousness arguments, especially if structurally similar compounds are annotated elsewhere.


4. Patent Landscape Analysis

4.1 Prior Art and Related Patents

Patent/Publication Publication Date Focus Relevance
WO2002/085908 December 10, 2002 Thiazolidinedione derivatives as PPARγ agonists Overlaps in chemical class, could challenge novelty
US6,927,019 August 9, 2005 PPARγ modulators with different core structures Potentially cited in prosecution history, indicates prior art landscape
EP1520394 May 12, 2004 Similar heterocyclic PPARγ agonists Similar scope, may affect obviousness analysis

4.2 Subsequent Patents and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Pfizer’s copyrights include patents on related PPARγ modulators, emphasizing active pipeline overlaps.
  • Follow-on patents by competitors tend to limit the patent’s commercial scope, especially if they disclose alternative synthesis routes or different substituent sets.

4.3 Patent Family and Global Coverage

Jurisdiction Patent Family Member Filing Date Scope
WO (World) WO2002/085908 Dec 2002 Broad composition claim for thiazolidinedione derivatives
EP (European) EP1520394 May 2004 Similar chemical scope, potential validity challenge
JP (Japan) Multiple filings 2003-2005 Regional coverage for chemical entities

5. Comparative Analysis with Competitors' Patents

Patent Claim Focus Scope Innovative Differentiator
US7,107,276 (Pfizer) Thiazolidinedione derivatives with improved selectivity Narrower, specific substituents Focus on reduced side effects
EP1,520,394 PPARγ agonists with heterocyclic modifications Similar, but with different heterocycles Alternative chemical strategies
US7,067,503 Combination therapies involving PPARγ modulators Therapeutic combinations Broader patent coverage

6. Implications for Patent Holders and Industry

6.1 Patent Validity and Enforceability

  • The '808 patent's claims are generally well-defined, with specific chemical structures and therapeutic uses.
  • Validity may be challenged based on prior art disclosures predating the filing date or obviousness in view of existing compounds disclosed before 2002.
  • The breadth of coverage enhances enforceability but also attracts potential invalidation efforts, especially against overlapping prior art.

6.2 Infringement Risks and Enforcement

  • Manufacturers developing novel PPARγ modulators must ensure they do not fall within the structured claims, especially regarding substituents and synthesis methods.
  • The patent's focus on specific chemical structures provides clear boundaries for infringement analysis, but variation in substituents could evade claims.

6.3 Licensing and Commercialization Strategy

  • Due to the broad coverage, licensing negotiations could encompass a wide range of compounds within the claim scope.
  • The patent's expiration date in 2024 (considering patent term adjustments) suggests a window for commercialization or licensing negotiations.

7. Future Directions and Considerations

  • Patent expirations could open opportunities for biosimilar or generic development, particularly in markets where patent rights are not protected.
  • Patent term extensions for regulatory delays could prolong exclusivity, influencing R&D strategies.
  • Further patent filings may focus on novel derivatives, alternative delivery methods, or combination therapies to circumvent the '808 patent claims.

8. Conclusion

The U.S. Patent 7,070,808 presents a comprehensive patent scope with broad claims covering thiazolidinedione derivatives as PPARγ modulators. Its well-defined chemical scope coupled with therapeutic claims makes it a significant patent for metabolic disorder therapies. However, a surrounding landscape rich with prior art and subsequent patents underscores the importance of precise patent landscapes, validity assessments, and strategic licensing. Stakeholders should carefully evaluate the claims' scope, potential for infringement, and opportunities as the patent approaches expiration.


9. Key Takeaways

  • The '808 patent's claims cover extensive chemical classes of PPARγ modulators with therapeutic utility in diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
  • Its broad chemical claim scope interacts with prior art; validity challenges may arise from earlier disclosures.
  • Parallel patents by competitors suggest a complex landscape requiring detailed freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • The patent's expiration, projected around 2024, presents market entry opportunities for biosimilars or generics.
  • Strategic licensing, patent prosecution, or design-around approaches are critical for players operating within or adjacent to this patent space.

10. FAQs

Q1: How broad are the chemical claims of U.S. Patent 7,070,808?
A: The claims encompass a wide class of substituted thiazolidinedione derivatives with various R-group modifications, covering multiple synthetic variants geared toward PPARγ activity.

Q2: Can new PPARγ modulators bypass this patent?
A: Potentially yes, if they feature structural modifications outside the scope of the claims, such as different heterocyclic cores or substitution patterns not covered.

Q3: What factors could challenge the patent's validity?
A: Prior disclosures of similar heterocyclic compounds, obviousness combined with prior art, or incomplete prior art searches could serve as grounds for invalidation.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact generic drug development?
A: The expiration around 2024 opens opportunities for generics, provided they avoid infringement of remaining claims and related patents.

Q5: What are best practices for licensees or competitors regarding this patent?
A: Conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, explore design-arounds with structurally distinct compounds, and consider licensing negotiations to mitigate legal risks.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 7,070,808. (2006). Compositions and Methods for Modulating PPARγ Activity.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WO2002/085908. (2002). Thiazolidinedione derivatives as PPARγ agonists.
  3. European Patent EP1520394. (2004). Heterocyclic PPARγ modulators.
  4. U.S. Patent No. 6,927,019. (2005). PPARγ modulators.
  5. Patent landscape reports on PPARγ modulators and thiazolidinedione derivatives, published by pharma research firms (e.g., IAM Patent Report 2020).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,070,808

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.