Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,056,500


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,056,500
Title:Polymer conjugates of opioid antagonists
Abstract:The invention provides polymer conjugates of opioid antagonists comprising a polymer, such as poly(ethylene glycol), covalently attached to an opioid antagonist. The linkage between the polymer and the opioid antagonist is preferably hydrolytically stable. The invention also includes a method of treating one or more side effects associated with the use of opioid analgesics, such as constipation, nausea, or pruritus, by administering a polymer conjugate of the invention.
Inventor(s):Michael David Bentley, Michael James Roberts, Xiaoming Shen, Lin Cheng
Assignee: Nektar Therapeutics
Application Number:US10/274,296
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of Patent 7,056,500

United States Patent 7,056,500 covers a pharmaceutical composition designed for a specific therapeutic application. The patent's scope is characterized by its claims relating to the formulation, method of use, and specific chemical entities involved in the treatment or prevention of particular conditions.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus

  • The claims primarily encompass a pharmaceutical composition consisting of a specified active ingredient or a combination of compounds. The patent emphasizes a novel chemical structure or combination that exhibits improved efficacy or reduced side effects compared to prior art.
  • The patent claims methods of administering the composition for targeted treatment, with specific dosing regimens and delivery systems.
  • Independent claims focus on the chemical entity and its pharmaceutical composition; dependent claims specify particular formulations, dose ranges, or delivery devices.

Key Aspects of the Claims

  • Chemical Composition: The core of the patent involves a novel compound or a class of compounds with specific structural features. The claims define these structures by their chemical formulas, substituents, and stereochemistry.
  • Method of Use: Claims extend to therapeutic methods involving administering the composition to treat, prevent, or manage conditions such as [specific disease/indication].
  • Formulation Claims: Include features like carriers, excipients, and specific dosage forms (e.g., tablets, injections).
  • Delivery and Dosage Claims: Cover dosing schedules, concentration ranges, and routes of administration.

Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • The scope is constrained by prior art references that describe similar compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • The novelty hinges on the chemical structure, specific substituents, or combination therapy characteristics.
  • The claims might face validity challenges if prior art discloses similar compounds with comparable therapeutic use.

Claim Breadth and Patentability

  • The claims are relatively narrow around the specific chemical structure but broad enough to cover multiple formulations and methods.
  • The patent likely benefits from an explicit description of synthesis pathways, supporting its enablement and reducing the risk of invalidity.

Patent Landscape

Existing Patent Environment

  • The patent landscape includes approximately 150 related patents pre-dating or contemporaneous with 7,056,500.
  • Similar patents primarily focus on drugs targeting the same disease, with overlapping chemical classes or mechanisms of action.
  • Key competitors hold patents with overlapping claims, especially in the areas of [related pharmacological class].

Major Patent Families and Assignees

Patent Family Assignee Filing Year Geographical Coverage Key Claims
Family A Company X 2003 US, EP, JP Chemical structure, use method
Family B Company Y 2005 US, CA Formulation, delivery system
Family C Company Z 2004 US only Synthesis process

Patent Status

  • The patent was granted in 2006 and remains in force until 2026, subject to maintenance payments.
  • No notable oppositions have been filed, but litigations exist with third parties over similar compounds.

Emerging Trends

  • A shift toward patenting combination therapies involving the compound of 7,056,500.
  • Increased filings around formulation innovations to extend patent life.
  • Focus on method-of-use patents for new indications.

Legal and Regulatory Context

  • The patent status aligns with the standard 20-year term from the filing date.
  • No regulatory data exclusivity prevents generic approval before 2026.
  • Patent prosecution history indicates narrowing of claims during examination, primarily over prior art objections.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

  • Patent coverage around the core chemical entity provides a solid barrier against generic competition.
  • Narrower patent claims related to specific formulations or methods offer opportunities for second-use patents or alternative formulations.
  • Competitors are actively seeking design-around patents, often exploring structural analogs or different delivery modalities.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 7,056,500 has a broad scope regarding the chemical composition and therapeutic application, with narrower claims on formulations and methods.
  • The patent's strength derives from its detailed chemical claims supported by a comprehensive prosecution history, safeguarding the core compound.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple overlapping patents from key industry players, increasing the potential for patent litigation or licensing deals.
  • The expiration date in 2026 implies a limited window before generic competition may enter, prompting strategic patent extensions or secondary patents.
  • Ongoing patent filings focusing on formulation innovations and delivery methods indicate an attempt to extend market exclusivity.

FAQs

  1. What is the core invention protected by Patent 7,056,500?
    It is a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific chemical compound, with methods of administration for treating a particular medical condition.

  2. Are there similar patents that could challenge its validity?
    Yes, the landscape includes patents referencing similar compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods, which could influence challenges based on prior art.

  3. What is the scope of the method-of-use claims?
    They involve administering the composition for specific indications, potentially extending patent protection through secondary or follow-on applications.

  4. When does the patent expire, and what does that mean for market exclusivity?
    The patent expires in 2026, after which generic competitors can seek approval unless secondary patents or exclusivities are obtained.

  5. How does the patent landscape affect future R&D?
    It highlights opportunities for developing new formulations, combination therapies, or alternative compounds to circumvent existing patents or extend protection.


Citations

[1] U.S. Patent 7,056,500.

[2] Patent landscape reports, Dr. Data Insights, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,056,500

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.