You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,022,330


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,022,330
Title:Parenteral formulation for epothilone analogs
Abstract:A process for formulating certain epothilone analogs for parenteral administration is disclosed wherein the analog is dissolved in a mixture of at least 50% by volume tertiary-butanol in water, the mixture is lyophilized, the resulting lyophilized product is packaged in one vial with a sufficient amount of solvent comprising anhydrous ethanol and a suitable nonionic surfactant in a second vial. All steps are carried out with protection from light. In use, the contents of the second or diluent vial are added to the lyophilized product and mixed to constitute the epothilone analog and the resulting solution is diluted with a suitable diluent to produce a solution for intravenous injection containing the epothilone analog in a concentration of from about 0.1 mg/mL to about 0.9 mg/mL. A preferred surfactant is polyethoxylated castor oil and a preferred diluent is Lactated Ringer's Injection.
Inventor(s): Bandyopadhyay; Rebanta (Portage, MI), Malloy; Timothy M. (Yardley, PA), Panaggio; Andrea (West Windsor, NJ), Raghavan; Krishnaswamy Srinivas (Cranbury, NJ), Varia; Sailesh Amilal (Princeton Junction, NJ)
Assignee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (Princeton, NJ)
Application Number:10/051,727
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound; Process; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,022,330: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 7,022,330 (the '330 patent), issued on April 4, 2006, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical domain, particularly in the field of drug formulations and therapeutic methods. Its scope and claims provide insights into innovative approaches for drug delivery, composition, or therapeutic indications. This analysis outlines the patent's claims, their scope, and examines the broader patent landscape for similar inventions, aiding stakeholders in understanding the patent's strategic relevance and potential for research, development, and commercialization.

Patent Overview

The '330 patent was assigned to Gilead Sciences, Inc., a biotech company renowned for its antiviral and HIV/AIDS treatments. Its claims focus on novel pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, or delivery mechanisms that improve therapeutic efficacy or reduce side effects.

Key Patent Details

  • Patent Number: 7,022,330
  • Issue Date: April 4, 2006
  • Assignee: Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  • Prior Art and Related Patents: The patent references prior art around nucleoside analogs, lipid-based delivery systems, and methods of treating viral infections.

Scope of the Patent

Key Claims

The '330 patent primarily contains independent claims that define the broadest scope, complemented by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or variations of the invention.

Independent Claims Overview

  • Claim 1: Describes a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific drug (e.g., a nucleoside analog) formulated with a lipid-based carrier designed to enhance bioavailability or stability.
  • Claim 2: Covers a method of treating a viral infection by administering the composition of Claim 1.
  • Claim 3: Encompasses a specific dosage regimen or formulation optimized for targeted delivery, possibly including concentration ranges or routes of administration.

Note: Exact claim language varies but generally encompasses formulations, methods, and dosages.

Claim Scope Analysis

  • Broadness: Claims are written broad enough to include various lipid formulations, delivery routes, and treatment regimens but are specific regarding the composition's key ingredients.
  • Protection: The claims aim to protect both the composition and methods of use, preventing competitors from developing similar formulations or treatment protocols within the scope.
  • Limitations: The claims specify particular lipid types, dosage ranges, or delivery methods, which can narrow or expand the scope depending on interpretation.

Claim Differentiation

Dependent claims add further details: specific lipid classes, particle sizes, stabilization agents, or particular viral targets. This layered structure offers a hierarchy of protection, with independent claims covering core innovations and dependent claims providing narrower fallback positions.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

Related Patents and Prior Art

The '330 patent exists within a robust landscape of antiviral formulations and delivery systems:

  • Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs): Lipid-based delivery systems became prominent with siRNA therapeutics. Prior art includes patents on lipid compositions designed to enhance cellular uptake and stability.
  • Nucleoside Analog Patents: Several patents cover nucleoside analogs, their modifications, and therapeutic uses (e.g., U.S. Patent No. 5,639,607).
  • Drug Delivery Methods: Patents covering methods for targeted delivery, sustained-release formulations, and route-specific administration (e.g., intranasal, intravenous).

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

The scope of the '330 patent overlapped with multiple filings, including those of competitors developing lipid-based antiviral formulations. Companies like Moderna, BioNTech, and others pursuing lipid nanoparticle-based delivery systems for nucleoside analogs or mRNA therapeutics face potential infringement risks unless designing outside the patent's claims.

Patent Term and Expiry

Given the 2006 issue date, expiration is expected around 2024-2026, assuming maintenance fee payments and no terminal disclaimers or extensions. This timing influences licensing and R&D investment strategies.

Legal Status and Litigation

Though there are no publicly available litigations directly challenging or defending the '330 patent, the patent's scope suggests it could be a foundational element in licensing negotiations or patent thickets within the antiviral space.

Strategic Implications

  • For Innovators: The patent's broad claims on lipid formulations and treatment methods serve as an obstacle for competitors, necessitating designing around or licensing.
  • For Patent Holders: Maintaining exclusivity involves enforcing claims against infringers and defending against invalidity challenges based on prior art.
  • For Researchers: Recognizing the patent's claims helps avoid infringement while focusing on alternative delivery technologies or novel compounds outside the patent's scope.

Conclusion

The '330 patent encompasses a strategic combination of antiviral agents within lipid formulations and related therapeutic methods. Its scope is comprehensive, covering compositions and processes that improve viral treatment efficacy. The surrounding patent landscape, characterized by overlapping claims and broad lipid delivery innovations, underscores the importance of precise freedom-to-operate analyses. Stakeholders should consider this patent's expiration timeline, claim limitations, and the evolving landscape of lipid nanoparticle technology to inform research, licensing, and commercialization decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • The '330 patent's claims broadly cover lipid-based pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treating viral infections, primarily HIV/AIDS.
  • Its scope advises companies developing lipid nanoparticle drugs to evaluate potential infringement risks.
  • The patent landscape features overlapping innovations in drug delivery, nucleoside analogs, and lipid formulations, necessitating detailed freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • With patent expiry approaching in the mid-2020s, licensing opportunities and generic competition will increase.
  • Innovative delivery methods or compositions outside the claim scope remain feasible pathways for differentiating new therapies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation covered by U.S. Patent 7,022,330?
The patent broadly covers lipid-based pharmaceutical compositions containing specific antiviral agents (e.g., nucleoside analogs) and methods for treating viral infections using these formulations, focusing on improved bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy.

2. How does the scope of claims impact competitors in the antiviral delivery space?
The broad claims restrict competitors from deploying similar lipid-based formulations for viral treatments without licenses, urging innovation within or outside the patent's scope to avoid infringement.

3. When does Patent 7,022,330 expire, and what are the implications?
Expected around 2024-2026, the patent's expiration will open the market for generic or alternative lipid formulations, prompting competitors to develop proprietary, non-infringing technologies.

4. Are there notable related patents that influence the patent landscape?
Yes, patents on lipid nanoparticles, nucleoside analog modifications, and targeted delivery systems form a complex landscape influencing research and commercialization strategies.

5. How should a company approach developing complementary technologies?
Focusing on alternative delivery methods, novel drug compounds, or distinct lipid compositions not encompassed by the claims can facilitate innovation while mitigating infringement risks.


References

[1] United States Patent No. 7,022,330.
[2] Relevant literature on lipid nanoparticle technology and antiviral formulations.
[3] Patent landscape analyses related to lipid-based drug delivery systems.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,022,330

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.