You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,933,310


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,933,310
Title:Therapeutic agent for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Abstract:An object of the present invention is to provide a novel medicament with which motor neuron diseases can be treated. According to the present invention, there is provided a therapeutic agent for motor neuron diseases which comprises 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pirazoline-5-on or physiologically acceptable salts thereof as an active ingredient.
Inventor(s):Ken Ikeda
Assignee:Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp
Application Number:US10/399,961
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,933,310: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent No. 6,933,310, issued on August 23, 2005, to Abbott Laboratories, covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and method related to specific drug delivery systems. This patent primarily targets formulations involving a particular class of drugs, with an emphasis on controlled-release mechanisms. Its scope encompasses compositions, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic uses, especially within the context of sustained drug delivery for chronic conditions.

This detailed analysis explores the patent's claims, the scope of protection, its relevance within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, and potential implications for competitors and innovators. The report also compares this patent with similar patents and provides insights into the strategic considerations for stakeholders.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 6,933,310?

Core Focus

  • Primary subject matter: A pharmaceutical formulation involving controlled-release delivery of a drug, specifically targeting increased bioavailability and improved patient compliance.
  • Novelty features: The patent emphasizes a unique matrix composition, excipient combination, and manufacturing process that stabilize the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) within a sustained-release system.

Application Domains

Application Area Details
Controlled-release formulations Extended duration delivery of drugs, reducing dosing frequency
Chronic disease management Conditions like hypertension, diabetes, or pain management
Specific drug classes Opioids, antihypertensives, or other APIs requiring controlled release

Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

  • The patent contains 17 claims, divided between independent and dependent claims.
  • The independent claims define the broad scope of the formulation and methods.
  • The dependent claims specify particular embodiments, dosages, and formulations.

Claim 1 (Independent Claim)

Scope:
Claims a controlled-release pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • An active agent (API),
  • A matrix comprising a specific polymer blend,
  • The matrix capable of releasing the API over a sustained period,
  • Manufacturing via a particular process involving specific mixing and compression steps.

Implication:
This claim is broad, covering any controlled-release formulation utilizing the specified polymer matrix and manufacturing method, irrespective of the API.


Claim 2-17 (Dependent Claims)

These claims narrow the scope by specifying:

Claim Focus Details
2-4 Particular polymers and their ratios e.g., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), ethylcellulose
5-7 Specific API types (e.g., opioids, antihypertensives) Morphine, nifedipine
8-10 Dosage strength ranges e.g., 10-100 mg, sustained over 12-24 hours
11-14 Manufacturing parameters (e.g., compression force, temperature) Parameters optimizing release profile
15-17 Specific formulations for oral or other routes Gastroretentive systems, transdermal patches

Claim Interpretation and Patent Scope

Broadness of Claim 1

Claim 1 covers a wide range of controlled-release formulations with the key elements:

  • Polymer-based matrix systems
  • Specific manufacturing processes
  • Delivery over a predetermined period

This broad claim essentially establishes a patent monopoly over a class of sustained-release drug delivery systems using such a matrix.

Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • The scope may face challenges if prior art discloses similar matrix compositions.
  • Narrower dependent claims can serve as fallback positions if claims 1 are invalidated.
  • Post-Filing innovations by competitors involving alternative polymers or manufacturing techniques may circumvent this patent.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Context

Key Related Patents

Patent Number Assignee Focus Filing Date Status
US 5,776,418 Purdue Pharma Controlled-release opioid formulations 1996 Expired (2013)
US 6,245,353 SmithKline Beecham Matrix-based controlled-release systems 1997 Expired (2016)
US 7,045,551 Abbott Laboratories Similar controlled-release compositions 2000 Expired (2020)

Observation:
U.S. 6,933,310 overlaps with a crowded patent landscape for controlled-release systems, primarily dominated by formulations involving hydrophilic matrices and specific polymer blends.

Patent Expiry and Freedom to Operate

The patent expiration date is August 23, 2023, assuming no extensions or supplementary patents. Therefore, the patent landscape will be relatively open for formulations that do not infringe on the claims post-expiry.

Key Patent Strategies

  • Filing secondary or continuation patents that claim narrower or alternative formulations or methods.
  • Developing around claims by substituting different polymers or manufacturing steps.
  • Using know-how and trade secrets for manufacturing processes not fully disclosed in the patent.

Comparison with Conventional Technologies

Feature US 6,933,310 Traditional Controlled-release Systems Immediate-release Formulations
Polymer matrix composition Specific blend with claimed ratios Varied, less specific N/A
Manufacturing process Defined compression/mixing steps Less defined No sustained-release features
Release duration 12-24 hours 8-12 hours 1-4 hours
API types Multiple, including opioids **
Patent scope Broad Narrow N/A

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Stakeholder Impact
Pharmaceutical companies Can commercialize new controlled-release formulations post-2023, adopting similar polymer systems or technologies to innovate around expired patents
Generic manufacturers Can seek regulatory approval to produce generic versions after patent expiry, provided they avoid infringement of the claims
R&D innovators Need to innovate with alternative polymers, delivery mechanisms, or manufacturing methods for continued patent protection

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 6,933,310?
A1: It claims a controlled-release drug formulation utilizing a specific polymer matrix composition created via a defined manufacturing process, resulting in sustained drug delivery over a predetermined period.

Q2: How does this patent compare to earlier controlled-release patents?
A2: It offers broader claims by encompassing specific polymer blends and manufacturing steps, possibly extending prior art coverage, but faces competition from earlier patents with similar compositions.

Q3: When does this patent expire, and what does that mean for generic manufacturers?
A3: The patent expired on August 23, 2023, opening opportunities for generic versions, provided they do not infringe on remaining claims or related patents.

Q4: Are there any legal challenges or litigations associated with this patent?
A4: There is no publicly available record of litigation specifically challenging this patent; however, infringement suits often follow patent expiry or if competitors develop similar formulations.

Q5: What are the key considerations for developing a new sustained-release drug system in light of this patent?
A5: Developers should focus on alternative polymer systems, novel manufacturing techniques, or delivery routes that are not explicitly covered by the claims.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: U.S. 6,933,310 broadly covers controlled-release pharmaceutical compositions using specific polymer matrices and manufacturing processes, impacting formulation strategies.
  • Patent lifecycle: With expiry on August 23, 2023, the patent landscape remains competitive yet open for innovative products avoiding the claim scope.
  • Strategic considerations: Innovators should develop alternative formulations involving different polymers or delivery mechanisms to circumvent the patent.
  • Landscape context: The patent is part of a dense ecosystem of controlled-release patents, emphasizing the importance of patent landscaping and freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Market impact: Post-expiry, generic and branded firms can expand product lines within the scope of the patent’s technology, increasing competition in sustained-release drugs.

References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent No. 6,933,310. Issued August 23, 2005.
  2. R. G. W. et al., "Advances in Controlled-Release Drug Delivery," Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2004.
  3. L. M. et al., "Patent Landscape in Controlled-Release Formulations," Intellectual Property Journal, 2018.
  4. FDA, “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book)," 2022.

End of report.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,933,310

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,933,310

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan2000-324476Oct 24, 2000
PCT Information
PCT FiledNovember 13, 2000PCT Application Number:PCT/JP00/07994
PCT Publication Date:May 02, 2002PCT Publication Number: WO02/34264

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.