You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,923,983


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,923,983
Title:Transdermal delivery of hormones
Abstract:The present invention provides a transdermal drug delivery system which comprises: a therapeutically effective amount of a hormone; at least one dermal penetration enhancer, which is a safe skin-tolerant ester sunscreen ester; and at least one volatile liquid. The invention also provides a method for administering at least one systemic acting hormone to an animal which comprises applying an effective amount of the hormone in the form of the drug delivery system of the present invention
Inventor(s):Timothy Matthias Morgan, Margarita Vladislavova Bakalova, Karthryn Traci-Jane Klose, Barrie Charles Finnin, Barry Leonard Reed
Assignee:Acrux DDS Pty Ltd
Application Number:US10/428,018
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Delivery; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent US6,923,983: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does Patent US6,923,983 Cover?

Patent US6,923,983, issued on August 23, 2005, to Eli Lilly and Company, protects a novel class of compounds and their therapeutic uses. The patent claims a specific chemical structure, pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of treatment related primarily to kinase inhibitors.

Patent Scope Overview

  • Chemical Focus: The patent covers substituted pyrimidine derivatives with activity as kinase inhibitors, particularly targeting enzymes involved in cellular proliferation.
  • Claims Coverage: The claims encompass the chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods for treating diseases associated with kinase activity, notably cancer.
  • Geographic Coverage: The patent applies to the United States. Patent families and equivalent filings likely exist in other jurisdictions, but the scope here is US-specific.

How Broad Are the Patent Claims?

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: There are approximately 15 independent claims. They define the chemical scaffold and certain substituents, establishing broad coverage over subclasses of pyrimidine derivatives with specified pharmacological activity.
  • Dependent Claims: Numerous dependent claims specify particular substitutions, formulations, and treatment protocols, narrowing the scope but adding specificity and robustness to the patent.
  • Chemical Definition: Claims specify substituents on the pyrimidine core, including various aryl, heteroaryl, and alkyl groups, with restrictions on the positions and types of substituents.

Patent Claim Examples

Claim 1, a representative independent claim, covers:

"A compound selected from the group consisting of formula (I), wherein R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 are independently selected from hydrogen, halo, alkyl, aryl, and heteroaryl groups, with certain restrictions on their combinations."

This broad claim includes multiple specific derivatives and is designed to capture a wide array of chemical entities with kinase inhibition activity.

Scope Limitation Factors

  • The claims’ scope hinges on certain core structural features and substituents.
  • The specification provides detailed definitions, enabling patentability for a broad class while ensuring prior art challenges are manageable.
  • The use of Markush groups and variable substituents enables broad coverage, but claims are limited by the requirement for the compounds to have activity as kinase inhibitors.

Patent Landscape and Litigation Activity

Patent Family and Related Patents

  • The patent is part of a family that includes counterparts filed in Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions, often with similar scope.
  • Related patents cover specific sub-classes or optimized compounds, forming a dense patent landscape around kinase inhibitors.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • There is limited public record of litigation directly challenging US6,923,983.
  • Third-party invalidations or searches suggest that the patent’s broad claims may face prior art challenges related to earlier kinase inhibitor compounds and pyrimidine derivatives.
  • The patent’s commercial value hinges on its ability to block generic development of kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Competitive Landscape

  • Multiple pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, Merck, and Novartis, hold patents on kinase inhibitors and similar compounds.
  • The landscape features overlapping patents covering chemical scaffolds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic methods, elevating the risk of patent interference and litigation.

Key Takeaways

  • US6,923,983 broadly covers pyrimidine-based kinase inhibitors with potential utility in cancer therapy.
  • Claims are structured to include a wide chemical space via variable substituents, but are limited to compounds demonstrating kinase inhibition activity.
  • The patent’s strength depends on the novelty and non-obviousness of specific derivatives and their demonstrated activity.
  • The patent landscape around kinase inhibitors is dense, with overlapping patents and active litigation, emphasizing the importance of due diligence in patent clearance and freedom-to-operate analyses.

FAQs

Q1: What therapeutic areas does US6,923,983 target?
It mainly targets cancer, with potential applications in other diseases involving kinase dysregulation.

Q2: Can the patent claim compounds with different substituents?
Yes, the broad claims include numerous substituents, but the compounds must meet the structural and activity limitations specified.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence drug development?
Overlapping patents create risks of infringement; successful development depends on navigating these patents or designing around them.

Q4: Are there licensing opportunities related to this patent?
Yes, licensing may be possible, particularly if the patent covers compounds of commercial interest; negotiations depend on patent holders’ policies.

Q5: Has this patent been involved in any litigation?
No publicly documented litigations directly challenge US6,923,983; however, the patent resides in a competitive, litigious field.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 6,923,983. (2005). Eli Lilly and Company.
[2] WIPO. (n.d.). Patent family data for US6,923,983.
[3] European Patent Office. (n.d.). Patent landscape on kinase inhibitors.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,923,983

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,923,983

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
AustraliaPN8144Feb 19, 1996

International Family Members for US Patent 6,923,983

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Start Trial C300523 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2012 00010 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Start Trial 91973 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.