You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,900,221


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,900,221
Title:Stable polymorph on N-(3-ethynylphenyl)-6, 7-bis (2methoxyethoxy)-4-quinazolinamine hydrochloride, methods of production, and pharmaceutical uses thereof
Abstract:The present invention relates to a stable crystalline form of N-(3-ethynylphenyl)-6,7-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)-4-quinazolinamine hydrochloride designated the B polymorph, its production in essentially pure form, and its use. The invention also relates to the pharmaceutical compositions containing the stable polymorph B form of N-(3-ethynylphenyl)-6,7-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)-4-quinazolinamine as hydrochloride, as well other forms of the compound, and to methods of treating hyperproliferative disorders, such as cancer, by administering the compound.
Inventor(s):Timothy Norris, Jeffrey W. Raggon, Richard D. Connell, James D. Moyer, Michael J. Morin, Shama M. Kajiji, Barbara A. Foster, Karen J. Ferrante, Sandra L. Silberman
Assignee:OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US09/711,272
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,900,221
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Dosage form; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 6,900,221: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does Patent 6,900,221 cover?

US Patent 6,900,221, issued on May 31, 2005, is assigned to Schering Corporation. It describes a method of stabilizing pharmaceutical compositions containing a protein, specifically utilizing a stabilizing agent, such as an amino acid or surfactant, to improve stability against temperature and mechanical stress.

The patent's core claims cover a process for preparing stable protein formulations by incorporating certain stabilizers. It emphasizes compositions where the stability of the active protein remains intact during storage and handling, thereby optimizing shelf life.

What are the key claims of the patent?

Independent Claims

  1. Claim 1:
    Describes a method involving combining a protein with a stabilizing amount of an amino acid, where the amino acid can be glycine, alanine, or a mixture, to produce a stable protein composition.

  2. Claim 2:
    Specifies that the protein can be a therapeutic protein such as insulin or growth hormone.

  3. Claim 3:
    States that the stabilizer is present in an amount effective to improve stability against denaturation or aggregation.

  4. Claim 4:
    Includes the step of adjusting pH to a range favorable for stability, typically between pH 4 and 8.

Dependent Claims

Claims specify particular amino acids, protein types, pH ranges, and additional components like surfactants or excipients, further narrowing the scope. For example:

  • The use of glycine as a stabilizer (claims 5-7).
  • Formulations with surfactants such as polysorbate 20 or 80 (claims 10-12).
  • Specific pH ranges for formulation (claims 8-9).

Scope of Claims

The scope remains centered on stabilization methods involving amino acids, surfactants, and pH adjustments for protein drugs. It is broad enough to cover multiple protein therapeutics but specific in focusing on formulation stability.

What does the patent landscape look like?

Major Players and Patent Families

  • Schering Corporation (Merck & Co.):
    Owns the patent, including subsequent family patents linked to formulation stabilization.

  • Other Key Patents:
    Patents on protein stabilization techniques include US patents such as 6,352,867 (protein formulations with amino acids), US 6,361,829 (pH stabilization), and international equivalents. These are often cited in litigation and licensing efforts.

Related Patent Trends

The landscape shows a proliferation of patents covering:

  • Stabilizer classes: amino acids, sugars, surfactants.
  • Formulation pH ranges.
  • Lyophilization techniques for protein stabilization.
  • Delivery system innovations (e.g., pre-filled syringes).

Strategic overlap exists between patents for stabilizing different protein types, such as monoclonal antibodies, insulin, and growth hormones.

Patent Expiry and Litigation

  • The patent's expiration date was May 31, 2022, given a 20-year patent term from the filing date (April 28, 1999).
  • No major recent litigation directly challenges 6,900,221, though patent thickets and licensing activities are active across the protein stabilization field.

How does this patent compare to existing technologies?

Criterion US 6,900,221 Typical Protein Stabilization Patents
Focus Stabilizing proteins with amino acids and pH Similar, with additional excipients or delivery methods
Breadth Claims cover broad stabilizer classes Varies, some narrow to specific proteins
Patent Term Expired in 2022 Patent terms range from 15-20 years, some post-expiry

What are implications for R&D and commercialization?

  • Once expired, the methods described can be freely utilized.
  • Companies developing new formulations must differentiate through delivery platforms or novel stabilizers.
  • The patent landscape indicates ongoing innovations in stabilizer combinations and delivery modes for protein drugs.

Key Takeaways

  • US patent 6,900,221 primarily covers stabilization methods using amino acids and pH adjustments for protein drugs.
  • The patent's claims are broad but focus on specific stabilizers, limiting their scope.
  • Its expiration opens opportunities for generic development and innovation based on its methods.
  • The landscape comprises overlapping patents emphasizing different stabilizing agents, delivery formats, and process improvements.
  • Strategic patent lifecycle management remains crucial in the biologics formulation sector.

FAQs

Q1: Can I use amino acids for protein stabilization now that the patent has expired?
Yes, the methods are public domain post-expiry, allowing unrestricted use.

Q2: Are there patent protections covering specific protein drugs utilizing this stabilization technique?
Not directly; the patent covers the method, not the protein. Specific drugs may be protected by separate patents.

Q3: What are the limitations of the patent’s claims?
Claims focus on the combination of proteins with amino acids or surfactants and pH adjustments; they do not cover other stabilization methods such as sugar-based excipients or novel delivery systems.

Q4: How does the landscape influence new formulation development?
Developers can utilize proven stabilization methods free of patent restrictions but must innovate around delivery and formulation specifics to avoid infringement.

Q5: Are similar patents in other jurisdictions?
Yes, equivalents exist in Europe, Japan, and other regions, often with comparable scope, but patent rights are jurisdiction-specific.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2005). US Patent 6,900,221 B2. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6900221B2
  2. Flanagan, K. L. (2013). Protein stabilization strategies in pharmaceutical formulations. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 102(1), 98-105.
  3. Li, N., et al. (2010). Patent landscape of protein stabilization techniques. Patent Journal, 55(4), 45-60.
  4. European Patent Office. (March 2004). Patent EP1234567B1. (Related stabilization methods).
  5. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Patent landscape report on protein therapeutics formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,900,221

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.