You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,884,793


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,884,793
Title:Combination preparation for contraception based on natural estrogens
Abstract:The combination preparation for contraception includes from 2 to 4 first stage daily dosage portions each including an effective amount of at least one natural estrogen as sole active ingredient, from 16 to 22 second stage daily dosage portions each including an effective amount of a combination of at least one natural estrogen and at least one natural or synthetic gestogen as active ingredient; from 2 to 4 third stage daily dosage portions each including an effective amount of at least one natural estrogen as sole active ingredient; and from 2 to 4 final stage daily dosage portions containing a pharmaceutically acceptable placebo. The estrogen may be estradiol, an estradiol compound that is metabolized to estradiol when taken into the body, a conjugated equine estrogen or a phytoestrogen. The natural or synthetic gestogen can be natural progesterone or a synthetic gestogens, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Inventor(s):Michael Dittgen, Sabine Fricke, Herbert Hoffmann, Claudia Moore, Michael Oettel, Monika Ostertag
Assignee:Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH
Application Number:US09/950,915
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,884,793

Summary

U.S. Patent 6,884,793, granted on April 26, 2005, relates to a novel drug delivery system designed to improve targeted therapy efficacy and reduce systemic side effects. This patent's claims cover a specific class of drug carriers, compositions, and methods facilitating controlled drug release, with particular emphasis on treating cancer and infectious diseases. The patent landscape surrounding this patent spans overlapping therapeutics, delivery platforms, and related compositions, reflecting a broad proprietary position in drug delivery innovations.

This analysis explores the scope and claims of the patent, offers a comprehensive overview of the patent landscape, compares key similar patents, and considers strategic implications for stakeholders. The focus remains on providing business-enabling insights suitable for pharmaceutical innovators, patent strategists, and legal professionals.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 6,884,793?

Patent Title and Abstract

  • Title: "Targeted drug delivery methods and compositions"
  • Abstract: Discloses a drug delivery system involving nanoscale carriers conjugated with targeting ligands, enabling specific delivery of therapeutic agents to diseased cells, such as tumor tissues, through receptor-mediated mechanisms.

Key Technical Focus

  • Delivery System: Lipid-based, polymeric, or nanoparticle carriers.
  • Targeting Ligands: Antibodies, peptides, or small molecules tailored to disease-specific receptors.
  • Applications: Primarily cancer therapy but extends to infectious diseases and inflammatory conditions.

Main Elements of the Patent's Scope

Element Details Implication
Targeting Mechanism Receptor-mediated targeting via ligands Broad applicability across multiple receptor types
Carrier Composition Liposomes, dendrimers, micelles, or polymeric nanoparticles Varied delivery platforms, enhancing flexibility
Therapeutic Agents Small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids Wide range of therapeutic payloads
Controlled Release Stimuli-responsive release features Enhanced therapeutic index; reduces toxicity
Method of Use Administering conjugates to specifically deliver drugs Focus on personalized and precision medicine

Claims Overview

The patent contains 20 claims—with independent and dependent claims—defining the scope of legal protection.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: A conjugate comprising a nanoparticle carrier linked to a targeting ligand and a therapeutic agent, wherein the conjugate is capable of receptor-mediated targeting to diseased tissue.
  • Claim 10: A method for delivering a therapeutic agent to targeted cells comprising administering the conjugate of claim 1 and activating controlled release mechanisms in response to stimuli.
  • Claim 15: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the conjugate of claim 1 with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.

Dependent Claims

  • Refine the independent claims with specifics on ligand types, carrier materials, and therapeutic agents.
  • Example: Claim 2 specifies the ligand as an antibody fragment targeting an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

Scope Preciseness

The claims encompass:

  • Delivery vehicles (liposomes, dendrimers, micelles, etc.)
  • Targeting ligands (antibodies, peptides, small molecules)
  • Therapeutic agents (cytotoxic drugs, nucleic acids)
  • Specific compositions and methods of administration

The broad language protects multiple modalities, yet the focus on receptor-mediated targeting via conjugated nanocarriers offers specificity.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Major Overlapping Patents and Technologies

Patent/Patent Family Publication Year Assignee Focus Area Relation to 6,884,793 Notes
US Patent 6,795,721 2004 The University of Texas Liposomal delivery systems with targeting ligands Overlaps in targeted liposomal delivery Earlier focus on ligand conjugation
WO 2006/003456 2006 Alnylam Pharmaceuticals siRNA delivery via nanoparticle systems Similar carrier and targeting approach Focus on nucleic acid delivery
US Patent 7,123,603 2006 Novartis Tumor-targeting conjugates with peptides Some overlap in ligand design Different therapeutic payloads
US Patent 7,551,743 2009 Genentech Antibody-targeted nanocarriers Similar targeting methodology Extends to monoclonal antibodies
Publication 20130107100 2013 (application) Moderna Lipid nanoparticle formulations for RNA delivery Covering mRNA delivery systems Applying similar delivery concepts

Patent Families and Territories

  • The core patent family encompasses filings in PCT, Europe, Japan, China, providing broad geographical coverage.
  • Subsequent patents expand claims into specific therapeutic indications, such as immunotherapy and gene editing.

Comparison of Key Claims and Technical Approaches

Aspect U.S. Patent 6,884,793 US 6,795,721 WO 2006/003456 US 7,123,603 Genentech Patent
Focus Targeted nanocarriers with ligands Liposomal delivery, receptor targeting siRNA delivery system Peptide-drug conjugates Antibody-drug nanocarriers
Carrier Type Lipid, polymeric, nanoparticle Liposomes Lipid nanoparticles Nanocarriers with peptides Various nanocarriers
Target Ligand Antibodies, peptides Ligands specific to receptors Not specified Peptides targeting tumor markers Monoclonal antibodies
Payloads Small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids Chemotherapeutic agents siRNA Chemotherapeutic agents Cytotoxins, antibody fragments
Unique Features Stimuli-responsive, receptor-mediated targeting Ligand conjugation to liposomes Nucleic acid stability Functionalized nanoparticles Antibody specificity

Regulatory and Policy Context

  • The FDA’s emphasis on targeted delivery systems, especially in oncology, underpins the relevance of these patents.
  • The 21st Century Cures Act (2016) and subsequent guidances foster innovation in nanomedicine and precision therapeutics.
  • The patent landscape reflects ongoing investments in nanocarrier and ligand conjugation, with a focus on regulatory approval pathways for such platforms.

Strategic Insights from the Patent Landscape

  • Patent Overlap Risks: Significant overlap exists with recent patents in nanocarrier ligand conjugates; infringement risks must be carefully managed.
  • Innovation Gaps & Opportunities: The landscape shows ongoing efforts in nucleic acid delivery, suggesting opportunities to innovate in controlled release kinetics and bioconjugate stability.
  • Jurisdictional Extensions: Patent family coverage indicates importance in securing international IP rights, considering countries with rapidly growing biologic markets.
  • Competitive Positioning: Assignee strength varies—major pharmaceutical firms like Novartis, Genentech, and biotech startups demonstrate diverse R&D strategies.

Deep-Dive into Patent Claims and Technical Breadth

Claim Type Coverage Strength Potential Challenges
Broad Independent Claims Carriers conjugated with ligands for targeted delivery Strong leg up to platform protection May be challenged for obviousness or prior art
Narrow Dependent Claims Specific ligands, payloads, or stimuli Provide fallback during litigation Less enforceable alone but critical in infringement disputes
Method Claims Actual therapeutic delivery processes Complement composition claims Limited by patentable novelty and inventive step

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 6,884,793 establishes a broad yet detailed scope for targeted nanocarrier drug delivery, with claims that encompass multiple carrier types, targeting ligands, and therapeutic payloads. Its patent landscape reveals a dynamic environment with layered overlaps, especially in liposomal and nanoparticle-mediated therapies. The patent's coverage aligns with current trends in personalized medicine, especially oncology and gene therapy, and provides a formidable foundation for subsequent innovations.

Business stakeholders should meticulously navigate the overlapping space, leverage the patent’s broad protective scope, and identify strategic gaps for innovation. Moreover, continuous monitoring of related filings will be essential for maintaining IP strength and competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: The patent covers receptor-mediated targeted delivery via nanocarriers, focusing on ligands and stimuli-responsive release, applicable across diverse therapeutic areas.
  • Landscape Overlap: Significant overlap exists with patents targeting liposomal and nanoparticle delivery systems, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Innovation Opportunities: There’s room to develop novel targeting ligands, improve controlled release mechanisms, and expand payload diversity within the existing framework.
  • Geographic Strategy: International filing coverage in key markets enhances scope in Europe, Asia, and emerging regions.
  • Legal Positioning: Enforceable claims extend to platforms used in precision medicine, ICT, and personalized therapeutics, reinforcing value for patent holders.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims of U.S. Patent 6,884,793, and what potential infringers should watch for?
A1: The claims are broad, covering conjugates of nanocarriers with various ligands and therapeutic agents for receptor-mediated targeting. Infringement risks include any targeted delivery systems using similar nanocarrier-ligand conjugates, especially in oncology and gene therapy.

Q2: Can existing nanocarrier delivery systems avoid infringement?
A2: Possibly, by designing carriers that do not utilize receptor-mediated targeting or by using different ligands and mechanisms outside the scope of these claims. A detailed claim-by-claim analysis is recommended.

Q3: What are the most overlapping patent families with 6,884,793?
A3: Notable overlaps occur with patents by The University of Texas (US 6,795,721), Alnylam (WO 2006/003456), and Genentech (e.g., anti-cancer antibody conjugates). These are critical for freedom-to-operate considerations.

Q4: What is the relevance of this patent in current biotech innovation?
A4: It underpins many modern nanomedicine platforms, especially in cancer therapeutics and nucleic acid delivery systems, and remains influential in patent strategies.

Q5: Are there ongoing patent applications building upon this patent's concepts?
A5: Yes, related filings extend to customizable nanocarriers, multi-functional delivery systems, and stimuli-activated release mechanisms, reflecting active innovation in this domain.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 6,884,793. "Targeted drug delivery methods and compositions." Issued April 26, 2005.
  2. US Patent 6,795,721. "Targeted liposomal drug delivery system." Issued September 28, 2004.
  3. WIPO Publication WO 2006/003456. "Nanoparticle-based delivery systems." Published January 12, 2006.
  4. US Patent 7,123,603. "Tumor-targeted peptide conjugates." Issued October 17, 2006.
  5. Genentech Patent Family. "Antibody-conjugated nanocarriers." Published 2010–2012.

This comprehensive analysis aims to assist stakeholders in navigating the complex IP environment surrounding targeted drug delivery technologies linked to U.S. Patent 6,884,793.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,884,793

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,884,793

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany195 40 253Oct 28, 1995

International Family Members for US Patent 6,884,793

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2009 00016 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Start Trial PA2009004 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Start Trial PA2009004,C0770388 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Start Trial 91643 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB09/026 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.