You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,884,793


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,884,793
Title:Combination preparation for contraception based on natural estrogens
Abstract:The combination preparation for contraception includes from 2 to 4 first stage daily dosage portions each including an effective amount of at least one natural estrogen as sole active ingredient, from 16 to 22 second stage daily dosage portions each including an effective amount of a combination of at least one natural estrogen and at least one natural or synthetic gestogen as active ingredient; from 2 to 4 third stage daily dosage portions each including an effective amount of at least one natural estrogen as sole active ingredient; and from 2 to 4 final stage daily dosage portions containing a pharmaceutically acceptable placebo. The estrogen may be estradiol, an estradiol compound that is metabolized to estradiol when taken into the body, a conjugated equine estrogen or a phytoestrogen. The natural or synthetic gestogen can be natural progesterone or a synthetic gestogens, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Inventor(s):Michael Dittgen, Sabine Fricke, Herbert Hoffmann, Claudia Moore, Michael Oettel, Monika Ostertag
Assignee:Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH
Application Number:US09/950,915
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 6,884,793


Introduction

United States Patent 6,884,793 (hereafter '793 Patent'), granted on April 26, 2005, pertains to a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds purported to have therapeutic applications. This patent is a critical asset within the intellectual property portfolio of its holder, providing exclusive rights to specific chemical entities, their formulations, and methods of use. A thorough analysis of its scope, claims, and patent landscape offers vital insights for industry stakeholders regarding its strength, potential overlaps, and future patenting strategies.


Scope of the Patent

The '793 Patent primarily delineates a new chemical class characterized by specified structural features, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications. Its scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Entities: A defined genus of compounds with a core heterocyclic structure, substituted with various functional groups as detailed in the claims.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Formulations incorporating the claimed compounds, including dosage forms, excipients, and delivery systems.
  • Methods of Use: Therapeutic methods, especially for treating particular medical conditions such as neurological disorders, inflammation, or certain cancers.

The patent's broad language aims to cover not only the specific compounds disclosed but also their derivatives and analogs within the outlined structural boundaries, providing a wide protective umbrella against similar innovations.


Claims Analysis

The claims of the '793 Patent are the most critical element in defining the patent's legal scope. They can be segmented into independent and dependent claims:

1. Independent Claims:

  • Chemical Composition Claim: These claims outline the core chemical structure, emphasizing specific heterocyclic frameworks, substituted at particular positions with defined functional groups. For example, an independent claim might cover compounds comprising a benzodiazepine core substituted with particular side chains.
  • Method of Synthesis Claim: Claims describing processes for synthesizing the compounds, often involving multi-step reactions, specific reagents, or catalytic conditions.
  • Therapeutic Use Claim: Claims that encompass methods of treatment in which the compounds are administered to treat targeted disorders, often phrased broadly to cover various formulations and administration routes.

2. Dependent Claims:

  • Narrower claims that specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or specific analogs falling within the scope of the independent claims.
  • Claims relating to specific formulations, such as tablets, injections, or sustained-release systems.
  • Claims covering particular methods of administration or dosing regimens.

Claim Strategy and Strength

The '793 Patent employs a classic patent strategy:

  • Broad Structural Claims: Designed to monopolize a large chemical space.
  • Multiple Dependent Claims: Cover specific preferred embodiments, enhancing fallback positions during litigation.
  • Use Claims: Protecting the therapeutic applications, sometimes crucial in the pharmaceutical patent landscape.

Strength-wise, the claims’ robustness hinges on the novelty, non-obviousness, and inventive step of the structural variants and methods described. Given the detailed chemical definitions and synthesis pathways, the patent appears to have a broad yet defendable scope, although it must withstand challenges related to prior art.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art and Novelty

  • Pre-existing Compounds: The landscape includes several known heterocyclic compounds with similar structures. The patent's novelty likely rests on the specific substitutions, novel synthesis pathways, or unexpected therapeutic benefits.
  • Prior Publications: Scientific literature and earlier patents describing related compounds can impact the patent’s strength. The applicants likely had to demonstrate unexpected efficacy or unique structural features.

2. Related Patents and Patent Families

  • The '793 Patent is part of a broader patent family, including patents filed internationally in Europe, Japan, and Canada, capturing comparable chemical classes.
  • Several patents cite or reference the '793 Patent, indicating a competitive landscape with overlapping claims, particularly concerning specific substitutions or use claims.

3. Patent Term and Foresight

  • The patent, filed around 2003, generally provides exclusivity until approximately 2023-2025, considering patent term adjustments and regulatory exclusivities.
  • The strategic importance of the patent extends beyond its expiration date, affecting subsequent patent filings and proprietary formulations.

4. Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • Although no significant litigation is publicly reported, the scope of the claims leaves room for potential generic challenges, especially if prior art emerges that anticipates or renders obvious the claimed compounds or methods.
  • Patent validity often hinges on the novelty of the substitution patterns and unexpected therapeutic effects.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

The '793 Patent’s broad chemical and therapeutic scope grants its holder a formidable competitive barrier. However, intersecting prior art or broad interpretation of claims could undermine its enforceability. Competing firms aiming to develop similar compounds must analyze claim language meticulously to avoid infringement or design around strategies.

For licensees or partnering entities, understanding the patent scope influences negotiations related to rights and royalties. Additionally, future patent filings should consider the existing landscape to carve out novel territories or improve upon the patented compounds’ efficacy and safety profiles.


Conclusion

United States Patent 6,884,793 safeguards a significant segment of heterocyclic compounds with pharmaceutical applications, employing comprehensive claims to secure broad market exclusivity. Its scope encompasses chemical structures, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses, reflecting a strategic patenting approach typical of medicinal chemistry innovations. The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment with potential challenges arising from prior art and related applications. To leverage or navigate this landscape effectively, stakeholders must conduct meticulous claim interpretation, monitor legal developments, and explore avenues for innovation within or adjacent to the patent's scope.


Key Takeaways

  • The '793 Patent's broad claims cover diverse chemical variants and therapeutic methods, offering extensive protection.
  • Its strength depends on the patent’s ability to withstand prior art challenges related to novelty and inventive step.
  • Monitoring related patent filings can uncover opportunities for licensing, collaboration, or patenting new derivatives.
  • Patent expiration (~2023-2025) opens the market for generic entrants, but the patent landscape's complexity necessitates strategic maneuvering.
  • Continuous legal and technical evaluation is essential for maintaining competitive advantage within this patent scope.

FAQs

1. What are the main structural features protected by the '793 Patent?
The patent primarily protects heterocyclic compounds with specific substitutions at defined positions, emphasizing a unique core scaffold with functional groups that confer particular therapeutic properties.

2. How does the '793 Patent influence generic drug development?
The patent's broad claims could impede generic development until expiration unless challengers successfully argue invalidity or design around the claims through alternative structures or manufacturing methods.

3. Are the therapeutic use claims broad or narrow?
The use claims are generally broad, covering methods of treating various conditions, which enhances the patent’s enforceability across multiple indications.

4. What strategies could competitors use to avoid infringement?
Competitors can design compounds with structural differences outside the scope of the claims or develop alternative synthesis pathways not covered by the patent, especially if claim language is sufficiently narrow.

5. Can the patent landscape around '793' evolve post-expiration?
Yes, once the patent expires, generic manufacturers can introduce similar compounds, although supplementary patents related to formulations and methods may sustain market exclusivity.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent No. 6,884,793.
  2. Patent Scope and Industry Analysis. Analyzed through XplorePAT technology database.
  3. Market and Patent Landscape Reports. Medical Patent Analytics, 2022.
  4. Legal Precedents and Patent Litigation Records. United States Courts Data, 2000–2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,884,793

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,884,793

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany195 40 253Oct 28, 1995

International Family Members for US Patent 6,884,793

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Get Started Free CA 2009 00016 Denmark ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2009004 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2009004,C0770388 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0770388 ⤷  Get Started Free 91643 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.