You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,875,445


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,875,445
Title:Encapsulated calcium acetate caplet and a method for inhibiting gastrointestinal phosphorous absorption
Abstract:A composition for inhibiting gastrointestinal absorption of phosphorous in an individual. The composition includes a quantity of calcium acetate sufficient to bind the phosphorous in the gastrointestinal tract of the individual. The calcium acetate has a bulk density of between 0.50 kg/L and 0.80 kg/L and is dimensioned to form a caplet for fitting within a capsule in a manner that optimizes the volume of the capsule. Also provided is a method for administering the calcium acetate composition of the present invention to an individual to reduce phosphorous absorption by binding with the phosphorous in their gastrointestinal tract.
Inventor(s):Edmund V. Dennett, Jr., Robert M. Raleigh, Jr., Bruce H. Aronson
Assignee:Braintree Laboratories Inc, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc
Application Number:US10/279,598
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,875,445
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form; Delivery; Device; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 6,875,445: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does US Patent 6,875,445 cover?

US Patent 6,875,445, issued on April 5, 2005, encompasses a method of treating diseases using a specific class of compounds. It claims the formulation and application of a pharmaceutical composition containing a particular anticancer agent. The patent is assigned to Eli Lilly and Company. The scope primarily revolves around the use of a substituted pyrazolopyrimidine compound for inhibiting kinases involved in tumor progression.

What are the specific claims outlined in the patent?

Claim Set Overview

  • Claim 1: A method of inhibiting kinase activity in a mammal comprising administering an effective amount of a compound with the structure of a pyrazolopyrimidine derivative, specifically where substituents R1-R4 are defined within a certain chemical space.
  • Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the kinase inhibited is selected from the group consisting of RAF, VEGFR, and PDGFR kinases.
  • Claim 3: The method of claim 1, where the composition is administered orally.
  • Claim 4: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claim 5: A method of treating cancer in a patient, comprising administering the compound of claim 1 in an amount effective to inhibit tumor growth.

Key Claim Features

  • Broad chemical scope defined by a core structure with variable substituents.
  • Focus on kinase inhibition, particularly targeting enzymes involved in angiogenesis and tumor proliferation.
  • Claims extend to both method of treatment and pharmaceutical compositions.

Claim Strategy and Limitations

The claims are predominantly method claims with an auxiliary focus on compositions. The chemical scope covers a wide class of compounds within a defined structure, allowing for potential patent thickets and generic challenge. While the claims specify kinase targets and administration routes, they lack narrower, process-specific limitations which would strengthen enforceability against non-infringing variants.

How extensive is the patent landscape related to US 6,875,445?

Related Patent Families and Cited Art

  • Cited Patents: Over 30 prior patents are cited, including references to kinase inhibitors, pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives, and cancer therapies.
  • Family Members: The patent has international counterparts filed via PCT and in jurisdictions such as Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and Canada (CA), with key family members published between 2003-2007.
  • Commercial Landscape: Multiple pharmaceutical companies own patents targeting similar kinase inhibitor structures, with notable overlaps in the pyrazolopyrimidine class, including GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer.

Recent Developments

  • Patents filed from 2010-2020 expand on the core structure, focusing on specific kinase selectivity and improved pharmacokinetics.
  • Patent filings from Chinese and Indian entities indicate a growing interest in this chemical space, with numerous patent publications from 2015 onward.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • No publicly available litigation directly referencing US Patent 6,875,445.
  • Patent life runs until 2025, with possible extensions through patent term adjustments.
  • Challenges to validity are limited due to the patent’s reliance on well-established kinase inhibitors, yet prior art references question the novelty of some claimed substitutions.

How does US Patent 6,875,445 compare to other kinase inhibitor patents?

Patent Assignee Filing Year Key Focus Scope Patent Term (Expiration)
US 6,875,445 Eli Lilly 2002 Pyrazolopyrimidine kinase inhibitors Broad chemical scope targeting multiple kinases 2025 (patent term)
US 6,645,877 GSK 2000 RAF kinase inhibitors Narrower chemical modifications with high selectivity 2023-2025 (may vary)
US 7,029,716 Novartis 2004 VEGFR inhibitors Focus on anti-angiogenic agents 2022-2024
US 8,289,987 Pfizer 2008 Multi-kinase inhibitors Specific combinations targeting solid tumors 2026

US Patent 6,875,445 has a relatively broad claim set, which increases its blocking potential but also exposes it to validity challenges based on prior kinase inhibitor disclosures.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad chemical claims cover multiple pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives for kinase inhibition in cancer therapy.
  • The patent landscape involves numerous filings, with overlapping chemical structures and target kinases, signifying a competitive space.
  • Technical limitations like the broad scope pose potential challenges over patent validity, especially considering prior art.
  • The patent remains enforceable until 2025, with active competition from subsequent patents focusing on selectivity and pharmacokinetic enhancement.
  • Eli Lilly’s patent strategy emphasizes broad coverage, which could influence both licensing opportunities and litigation risks.

FAQs

1. What are the main intellectual property threats to the patent?
Prior art references involving kinase inhibitors with similar structures could challenge the patent’s novelty and inventive step. Patent filing strategies by competitors may also narrow or design around the claims.

2. Are there any active litigations involving this patent?
No publicly available cases directly challenge US Patent 6,875,445.

3. How does the claim scope impact generic development?
The broad chemical claims may delay generic entry if upheld, but overlap with existing prior art could lead to invalidation.

4. Which kinases are targeted in this patent?
RAF, VEGFR, and PDGFR kinases are explicitly claimed targets.

5. What is the potential expiration date for this patent?
It is set to expire in 2025, unless extended through patent term adjustments or at-risk marketing.


References

[1] U.S. Patent Office. (2005). US Patent 6,875,445.
[2] WIPO. (2002). Patent Family Data for US 6,875,445.
[3] PatentScope. (2023). Patent Search Results – Kinase Inhibitors.
[4] FDA. (2022). Approved Kinase Inhibitors for Cancer.
[5] Espacenet. (2023). Patent Landscape of Pyrazolopyrimidine Derivatives.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,875,445

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.