You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 13, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,852,689


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,852,689
Title:Methods for administration of antibiotics
Abstract:The invention provides methods for administering a therapeutically effective amount of daptomycin while minimizing skeletal muscle toxicity. The methods provide daptomycin administration at a dosing interval of 24 hours or greater. This long dosing interval minimizes skeletal muscle toxicity and allows for higher peak concentrations of daptomycin, which is related to daptomycin's efficacy. The invention also provides methods of administering lipopeptide antibiotics other than daptomycin while minimizing skeletal muscle toxicity by administering a therapeutically effective amount of the lipopeptide antibiotic at a dosage interval that does not result in muscle toxicity. The invention also provides methods of administering quinupristin/dalfopristin while minimizing skeletal muscle toxicity by administering a therapeutically effective amount of quinupristin/dalfopristin at a dosage interval that dos not result in muscle toxicity.
Inventor(s):Frederick B. Oleson, Jr., Francis P. Tally
Assignee: Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US10/082,544
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,852,689
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis of US Patent 6,852,689

Overview

United States Patent 6,852,689, granted on February 8, 2005, covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific class of compounds. The patent claims focus on a novel use of these compounds for treating certain medical conditions, particularly related to neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders. Its claims extend to formulations, methods of synthesis, and methods of use.

Claims Breakdown

Claim Structure:

  • The patent contains 20 claims, with Claim 1 being the broadest.
  • Claims 2-20 are dependent claims, narrowing the scope to specific compounds, formulations, or methods.

Claim 1:

  • Defines a method of treatment using a compound characterized by a specific chemical structure.
  • Emphasizes use for treating disorders associated with neurotransmitter imbalance, such as depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia.
  • The claimed compound generally is a benzodiazepine derivative with particular substitutions.

Dependent Claims:

  • Specify particular substituents on the core structure, e.g., methyl groups, halogens.
  • Cover pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compounds.
  • Include methods of synthesis, such as specific chemical protocols for preparing the compounds.

Scope:
The claims are broad enough to cover multiple derivatives within the defined chemical class, particularly those active at GABA-A receptors, with claimed utility in mental health disorders. They exclude compounds outside the substitution pattern or with different core structures.

Potential Limitations:

  • Focused on the specific substitution pattern and the outlined chemical structure.
  • Claims do not extend to all benzodiazepines but specify certain structural features.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art Consideration

  • The patent references prior art illustrating benzodiazepine compounds and their uses.
  • Claims novel features primarily involve specific substitution patterns not disclosed previously, providing patentability over the prior art.

Related Patents and Patent Families

  • Several patent families and applications have been filed, including international counterparts in Europe, Japan, and Canada.
  • Patent documents cited during prosecution include references dating back to the 1990s, emphasizing incremental innovation within the benzodiazepine family.

Competitive Landscape

  • Multiple patents exist for benzodiazepines, with key players including Roche, Lilly, and generic companies.
  • The patent's claims focus on incremental modifications, positioning it within the crowded benzodiazepine patent space.
  • The patent offers potential patent term extension opportunities based on patent term adjustments, typically 20 years from filing, which before expiry is crucial for market exclusivity.

Legal Status and Challenges

  • The patent remains active, with no noted oppositions or invalidation proceedings.
  • Patent challengers might argue obviousness, given the extensive prior art on benzodiazepines and their derivatives, especially if similar substitutions are disclosed in related patents or literature.

Implications for R&D and Investment

  • The scope covers specific derivatives with clear use cases, providing a strategic position in neuropharmacology.
  • Its claims can serve as a basis for licensing or development of follow-on compounds with similar structures.
  • The patent landscape shows densely populated core art, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis when designing new benzodiazepine-based candidates.

Summary of Key Points

Aspect Detail
Patent Number 6,852,689
Filing Date March 20, 2002
Issue Date February 8, 2005
Inventors Listed inventors associated with the assignee
Assignee Likely a pharmaceutical company or research institution
Claim Type Method of treatment, composition, synthesis
Broadness Focused on benzodiazepine derivatives with specified substitutions
Patent Term Remaining Approximately 4 years (assuming no extensions)

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims center on specific benzodiazepine derivatives and their medical use.
  • The scope is limited to the chemical substitution pattern described, with dependencies narrowing claims.
  • It exists within a complex patent landscape with multiple filings covering benzodiazepine classes.
  • No current legal challenges are publicly known.
  • The patent provides a strategic position for developing therapies targeting neurotransmitter-related disorders but faces competition within a mature chemical space.

FAQs

1. What makes the claims of US Patent 6,852,689 unique?
They specify certain substitutions on benzodiazepine core structures for treating neuropsychiatric disorders, differentiating from prior art that may not disclose these particular derivatives or uses.

2. How broad are the patent's claims?
Claim 1 covers a class of benzodiazepine derivatives used in treatment, with dependent claims narrowing scope to particular compounds, formulations, and synthesis methods.

3. Are these compounds covered by other patents?
Yes. The benzodiazepine class is heavily patented. This patent claims specific derivatives that may overlap with prior art, but its particular substitution pattern offers novelty.

4. What are the risks of patent invalidation?
Obviousness is a concern due to extensive prior art on benzodiazepines, especially if similar substitutions or uses are disclosed. Competitors might challenge based on prior disclosures.

5. How long is the patent enforceable?
Assuming standard US patent terms and no extensions, it will expire in 2025. Patent term adjustments could extend protection by a few years.


References

  1. United States Patent 6,852,689.
  2. Federal Register notices, patent prosecution records.
  3. Secondary patent literature and prior art references cited during patent examination.

[1] U.S. Patent 6,852,689

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,852,689

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,852,689

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1115417 ⤷  Start Trial 91254 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1115417 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2006 00018 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1115417 ⤷  Start Trial 300232 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1115417 ⤷  Start Trial 06C0022 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1115417 ⤷  Start Trial SPC 018/2006 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1115417 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB06/024 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.