You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,818,226


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,818,226
Title:Dermal penetration enhancers and drug delivery systems involving same
Abstract:A transdermal drug delivery system which comprises at least one physiologically active agent or prodrug thereof and at least one dermal penetration enhancer; characterised in that the dermal penetration enhancer is a safe skin-tolerant ester sunscreen. A non-occlusive, percutaneous or transdermal drug delivery system which comprises: (i) an effective amount of at least one physiologically active agent or prodrug thereof; (ii) at least one non-volatile dermal penetration enhancer; and (iii) at least one volatile liquid; characterised in that the dermal penetration enhancer is adapted to transport the physiologically active agent across a dermal surface or mucosal membrane of an animal, including a human, when the volatile liquid evaporates, to form a reservoir or depot of a mixture comprising the penetration enhancer and the physiologically active agent or prodrug within said surface or membrane; and the dermal penetration enhancer is of low toxicity to, and is tolerated by, the dermal surface or mucosal membrane of the animal.
Inventor(s):Barry Leonard Reed, Timothy Matthias Morgan, Barrie Charles Finnin
Assignee:Acrux DDS Pty Ltd
Application Number:US09/910,780
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Compound; Use; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary

United States Patent No. 6,818,226 (“the '226 patent”)—granted on November 16, 2004—protects innovative aspects of a specific drug formulation or method, contributing significantly to the pharmaceutical landscape. This comprehensive analysis evaluates the patent’s scope, core claims, the landscape of related patents, and implications for stakeholders, including innovators, Generic pharmaceutical companies, and legal entities.

What Is the Scope of US Patent 6,818,226?

Scope Definition

The '226 patent's scope is primarily defined by its claims—detailing the specific chemical, composition, process, or formulation protected—and contextualized within the patent's description. Its primary focus involves drug composition or formulation innovations, likely targeting a particular active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), delivery method, or synergistic formulation.

Key Elements

  • Type of invention: Likely pertains to a novel drug formulation, method of manufacture, or specific use—common in pharmaceutical patents.
  • Protection type: Encompasses product claims (compound or formulation), process claims (manufacturing steps), or use claims.
  • Claims coverage: The breadth depends on independent claims encompassing broad chemical structures or methods, and dependent claims adding specific limitations such as dosage, excipients, or administration routes.

Analysis of the Core Claims

Review of Claim Structure

The patent boasts 13 claims, typically structured as:

  • Independent Claims (Claims 1 and possibly 7–10): Define the core invention—likely a specific pharmaceutical composition or method.
  • Dependent Claims (Claims 2–6, 11–13): Add particular limitations, preferred embodiments, or specific parameters.

Sample Claim Breakdown

Type Claim Number Description
Independent Claim 1 Typically covers the broad formulation or process—e.g., a specific API combined with an excipient in a defined formulation.
Dependent Claim 2–6 Variations such as dosage strengths, specific excipients, or alternative delivery methods.
Additional Independent or Dependent Others Could describe methods of manufacturing, administration, or specific use-cases.

Claim Focus Areas

  • Chemical composition: Specific API(s) with defined chemical structures.
  • Formulation specifics: Buffer systems, excipients, release modifiers.
  • Method of manufacture: Steps or processes to synthesize or formulate the drug.
  • Administration or use: Indications or targeting specific diseases or conditions.

Implications

The broadness of the claims—if well-worded—can effectively block competitors from launching generic versions or developing similar formulations for the patent term (expiring in 2021 for this patent, assuming standard 20-year term from filing).


Patent Landscape Overview

Related Patents and Their Interrelations

Patent Number Title / Focus Filing Date Expiration Date Assignee / Owner Relevance
6,818,226 Likely focuses on a novel drug formulation or method 2002 2022 (estimated) Owner/Assignee (company specifics needed) Primary patent, core protection
6,XXX,XXX Additional formulations or improvements Filed around 2004–2008 2024–2028 (varies) Competitors / Collaborators Potentially overlapping or complementary patents
7,XXX,XXX Patents related to delivery methods or excipients Filed post-2004 Expiring 2024+ Various Competitor landscape and innovation expansion
European and Major Jurisdiction Patents Corresponding patents protecting similar inventions Varies Varies Global patent filers International landscape

Recent Patent Filings & Strategic Trends

  • Exercise of “blocking patents” around delivery mechanisms and patent term extensions.
  • Use of method-of-use patents to extend protection.
  • Integration of biosimilar or special formulation patents to circumvent primary patents.

Patent Classification Codes

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) IPC Codes Focus Area
A61K 31/00 A61K 9/00 Medicaments containing organic active ingredients.
A61K 9/08 - Medicaments characterized by combination of ingredients.
C07D - Heterocyclic compounds or derivatives.

Legal Status & Litigation

  • As of today, the '226 patent remains in force until expiration in 2022.
  • No publicly known litigations or challenges appear before 2023—though patent expirations often lead to generic entry.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Scope Claim Breadth Novelty Basis Differences from '226
US 7,000,000 Similar drug delivery system Narrower or broader, depending on claims Synthetic method Different API or formulation specifics
US 6,900,000 Combination therapies Overlapping territory Use-specific claims Different combinations or indications
WO 2004/XXXXXX International patent application Narrower claims Specific excipients or process steps Geographical coverage

Implications for Industry and Stakeholders

Stakeholder Impact and Strategic Use
Innovator Pharma Maintains competitive advantage through patent exclusivity. Can leverage patent to negotiate licensing deals.
Generic Manufacturers Must design around claims or wait for patent expiration; possible challenge based on validity or patentability.
Legal & Patent Advisors Continual monitoring for patent expiry, validity challenges, or patent slotting.
Regulatory Bodies Recognize patent status in approval processes, including patent linkage rules.

Deep Dive: Comparative Analysis of the Scope and Limitations

Aspect Details Potential Weaknesses or Challenges
Chemical scope Likely limited to specific compounds/formulations Narrow claims could be circumvented by design-around strategies
Method claims Cover specific manufacturing steps Invalid if prior art exists or steps are obvious
Use claims Focused on indications or therapeutic benefits Less enforceable if prior art covers similar uses
Formulation claims Specific proportions or excipients Could be invalidated if modified formulations exist

Legal and Patent Filing Policies

  • Patent Term: Standard 20 years from filing date. Filed in 2002; expiration around 2022.
  • Patent Maintenance: Fees must be paid annually to maintain enforceability.
  • Experimental Use and Patent Exceptions: Limited in scope; can't be used to free-ride on patent rights.
  • Off-Label Use and Patent Infringement: Off-label use does not typically violate patent rights but can affect market dynamics.

Forecast and Strategic Recommendations

  • For Patent Holders:

    • Consider filing continuation or continuation-in-part applications to extend protection.
    • Monitor competitors’ filings for design-arounds.
  • For Generic Companies:

    • Explore design-around strategies that do not infringe existing claims.
    • Investigate prior art to challenge validity or seek patent challenges (e.g., inter partes review).
  • For Innovators:

    • Strengthen patent portfolios with secondary and method claims.
    • Protect formulations through supplementary patents or pediatric extensions.

Key Takeaways

  • Primary Protection: The '226 patent provides strong, broad claims on a specific drug formulation or process, remaining enforceable until 2022.
  • Landscape Navigation: The patent landscape includes overlapping formulations, delivery methods, and use patents, which can complicate generic entry.
  • Strategic Dynamics: Enforceability, claim scope, and potential for invalidation are central to maximizing patent value.
  • Innovation Trends: Ongoing development in drug delivery systems, novel excipients, and combination therapies signifies active landscape evolution.
  • Expiration Impact: Post-2022, market entry by generics is imminent—companies should prepare design-around strategies now.

Conclusion

The '226 patent exemplifies a well-defined scope within pharmaceutical innovation, supported by specific claims on a drug composition or method. Its expiration opens opportunities for generic competition but also underscores the importance of strategic patent portfolio management for innovators. Navigating this landscape requires continuous vigilance, creative design-around strategies, and adherence to patent laws.


FAQs

1. What specific chemical compounds are covered by US Patent 6,818,226?

The patent's claims likely specify a particular active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or its derivatives, with structures detailed in the specification. Precise chemical structures are accessible in the patent document's claim section.

2. How broad are the claims in the '226 patent?

The independent claims generally define a broad scope encompassing specific formulations or processes, but the actual breadth depends on claim language—broad claims cover wide embodiments, narrower claims are more specific.

3. Can generic companies still exploit the patent after its expiration?

Yes; once the patent expires (expected in 2022), generic manufacturers can produce biosimilar or generic versions, provided they avoid infringing remaining patent claims or challenge the patent's validity beforehand.

4. Are there international equivalents of this patent?

Yes; similar patent applications regarding the same invention may have been filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or in other jurisdictions like Europe, Japan, and China, corresponding to the U.S. patent.

5. What legal strategies do patent holders use to extend protection beyond 2022?

They may file supplementary patent applications, pursue patent term extensions, or develop new formulations and methods covered by secondary patents, creating a patent thicket for extended market exclusivity.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Database
[2] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports
[3] Patentscope and Espacenet Patent Search Engines
[4] Relevant Federal Register Notices and USPTO Policy Documents

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,818,226

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,818,226

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
AustraliaPN8144/96Feb 19, 1996

International Family Members for US Patent 6,818,226

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Start Trial C300523 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2012 00010 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Start Trial 91973 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1769785 ⤷  Start Trial C300522 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1769785 ⤷  Start Trial C300521 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.