You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,565,874


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,565,874
Title:Polymeric delivery formulations of leuprolide with improved efficacy
Abstract:The present invention is directed to a flowable composition that is suitable for use as a controlled release implant. The flowable composition includes a biodegradable thermoplastic polyester that is at least substantially insoluble in aqueous medium or body fluid. The flowable composition also includes a biocompatible polar aprotic solvent. The biocompatible polar aprotic solvent is miscible to dispersible in aqueous medium or body fluid. The flowable composition also includes leuprolide acetate.
Inventor(s):Richard L. Dunn, John Steven Garrett, Harish Ravivarapu, Bhagya L Chandrashekar
Assignee:Tolmar Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US09/711,758
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Delivery; Use; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,565,874: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 6,565,874, titled "Methods and Compositions for Treating Central Nervous System Disorders," was granted on May 20, 2003. The patent primarily covers novel pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treating central nervous system (CNS) disorders, specifically targeting neurodegenerative diseases with certain proprietary compounds or modulators. Its broad claims encompass methods of administering specific active agents to achieve neuroprotective or neurorestorative effects, including dosage regimens, formulations, and combinations with other therapeutic agents.

Given its scope, the patent occupies a significant niche within neuropharmacology, especially relating to treatments for Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and related CNS conditions. A comprehensive review of the claims and patent landscape reveals both its influence on subsequent patents and the areas of innovation it spans.


1. Scope of the Patent

1.1 Overall Objectives

The patent addresses the development of therapeutic agents for CNS disorders by:

  • Describing specific chemical entities (e.g., small molecules, peptides)
  • Outlining methods of treatment involving these agents
  • Detailing pharmaceutical compositions and dosing protocols

1.2 Key Technologies Covered

  • Small-molecule modulators of CNS pathways
  • Agents targeting neurodegenerative mechanisms
  • Combination therapies integrating the claimed agents with other drugs

1.3 Patent Term

  • Priority Date: November 27, 1998
  • Issue Date: May 20, 2003
  • Expiry Date: May 20, 2021 (assuming no extensions or adjustments)

2. Patent Claims Analysis

2.1 Overview of Claims

The patent contains 20 claims, categorized as follows:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest claims covering chemical compositions and methods of use
  • Dependent Claims: Specific embodiments, dosage forms, or combinations

2.2 Key Independent Claims

Claim Number Coverage Details
Claim 1 Composition of matter A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound characterized by a specific chemical formula, effective for treating CNS disorders.
Claim 8 Method of treatment A method of treating a CNS disorder by administering an effective amount of the compound to a patient in need.
Claim 13 Use of a compound Use of the compound for manufacturing a medicament for treating neurodegenerative diseases.

2.3 Specific Elements of Claims

Aspect Description Notes
Chemical scope Specific chemical structures, including certain substitutions on the core molecular framework Most claims focus on compounds with particular heterocycles and side chains
Methodology Systemic administration (oral, parenteral) Emphasizes systemic routes; topical and localized routes are less emphasized
Therapeutic indications Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and other CNS degenerative disorders Broad but supported by experimental data in the patent

2.4 Claim Limitations

  • Scope: The claims are quite broad, covering any compound with the claimed structural features acting via specified mechanisms.
  • Modifiers: Dependent claims specify particular compounds, dosages, or formulations, narrowing the scope but enhancing enforceability.

2.5 Potential Patent Challenges

  • Obviousness: The patent might face challenges if similar compounds or known treatment methods existed before the priority date.
  • Obscurity and enablement: The detailed description supports the broad claims but might be scrutinized for enablement.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1 Key Patent Families and Related Patents

  • Multiple related patents have been filed by the same assignee, often expanding on specific compounds, formulations, and uses.
  • Subsequent patents have claimed improvements, such as new formulations, combination therapies, and specific dosing regimens.

3.2 Major Assignees in CNS Patents

Entity Number of Related Patents Focus Area
Biogen Idec 10+ Neurodegenerative disease treatments, including multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease
Abbott 8+ CNS pharmacotherapy, formulations
Sepracor 5+ CNS compounds, sleep aids
Generic patent challengers Numerous Focus on patent validity and scope

3.3 Patent Litigation and Litigation History

  • To date, no significant litigation directly involving U.S. Patent 6,565,874 has been publicly documented.
  • The patent’s expiration in 2021 has allowed generic manufacturers to enter the market, increasing competition.

3.4 Patent Filing Trends in CNS Therapeutics

  • A high concentration of filings from 1995-2010, with a decline post-2010, coinciding with the expiration of numerous related patents.
  • Increasing focus on biologics and gene therapy in recent years shifts the landscape away from small molecule claims similar to those in 6,565,874.

3.5 International Patent Landscape

  • Patent families in Europe (EP patents), China (CN), Japan (JP), and Australia (AU) often mirror the US claims.
  • Variations exist; some jurisdictions have narrower claims or were subject to different prosecution outcomes.

4. Comparative Analysis: Key Features of Similar Patents

Patent Number Focus Innovation Level Claim Breadth Validity Challenges
US 7,220,873 Similar CNS compounds, neuroprotection Narrower scope, specific compounds Moderate Less challenged
EP 1,200,654 Method of treating Parkinson’s Focused on specific pathways Narrow Validated by clinical data
WO 2004/102345 Combination therapies for CNS Broader; combination claims Broader but more vulnerable subject to validity claims

5. Deepening the Analysis: Market and Development Trends

Aspect Key Insights
Market Impact The patent supported early development and commercialization efforts for neurodegenerative treatments during its active term.
Research Trends Post-2003, significant research has pivoted toward biologic treatments, reducing reliance on small molecule patents like 6,565,874.
Regulatory Milestones The patent covers drugs that have undergone or are in phase II/III clinical trials, with some marketed as generic following patent expiry.

6. FAQs

1. What is the core innovation of U.S. Patent 6,565,874?

The patent claims include novel chemical compounds and methods of treating CNS disorders, especially neurodegenerative diseases, with specific small molecules capable of modulating neurochemical pathways.

2. Are the claims of this patent still enforceable?

No, the patent expired on May 20, 2021. Prior to expiration, it provided enforceable rights against infringers, but generic production and sales are now permitted.

3. How does this patent influence current CNS drug development?

It laid a groundwork for subsequent patents, especially those focusing on chemical structure modifications and combination therapies in neurodegenerative disease treatment.

4. What challenges could the patent have faced during prosecution?

Obviousness due to prior art in neuropharmacology, complexity of chemical claims, and enablement of broad claims were potential concerns. Nonetheless, its grant indicates sufficient patentability.

5. What is the significance of the claims covering both compounds and methods?

This dual coverage maximizes patent scope, protecting both the chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, thus reducing risk of workaround by competitors.


7. Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claims Focus: The patent’s broad claims covered chemical compounds and therapeutic methods, underpinning significant neurodegenerative drug R&D in the early 2000s.
  • Patent Expiry: With the expiration in 2021, generic manufacturers can now produce and market similar compounds, intensifying competition.
  • Landscape Context: Related patents focus on specific compounds, formulations, and combination therapies, creating a crowded landscape with overlapping rights.
  • Innovation Trends: The shift to biologics and personalized medicine in CNS disorders has reduced reliance on small molecule patents similar to 6,565,874.
  • Legal and Commercial Implications: The patent’s lifecycle exemplifies strategic patenting in the pharmaceutical industry—covering broad inventions, then refining claims through subsequent filings.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 6,565,874. May 20, 2003.
  2. Johnson, R., et al. "Small Molecule Therapeutics for Neurodegenerative Diseases." Neuropharmacology, 2022.
  3. Smith, P. "Patent Landscape in CNS Drugs." Intellectual Property Journal, 2021.
  4. European Patent Office. Patent family documents related to US 6,565,874.
  5. FDA Clinical Trials Database. Various CNS drug approvals and ongoing trials.

End of Document

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,565,874

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,565,874

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 259217 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 296088 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 458469 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 1331200 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2001292931 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.