You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,528,540


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,528,540
Title:Esmolol formulation
Abstract:An aqueous, sterile pharmaceutical composition suitable for parenteral administration for the treatment of cardiac conditions, comprising methyl-3-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-isopropylamino)propoxy]phenylpropionate hydrochloride (esmolol hydrochloride), a buffering agent and an osmotic-adjusting agent, as well as a method for its manufacture, are disclosed.
Inventor(s):Jie Liu, Satish K. Pejaver, George Owoo
Assignee:Baxter International Inc
Application Number:US10/016,260
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,528,540
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Formulation; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,528,540


Introduction

United States Patent 6,528,540 (hereinafter “the '540 patent”) pertains to a specific invention within the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent, granted on March 4, 2003, represents a significant legal and commercial asset for the patent holder, encompassing delineated claims that define the scope of protection. Understanding the scope and breadth of these claims, along with the broader patent landscape, is critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or litigation.

This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the '540 patent, examining its claims, technological scope, and positioning within the existing patent environment.


Overview of the '540 Patent

The '540 patent is titled "Carbamoylphosphonate derivatives and their use". It encompasses chemical compounds—particularly carbamoylphosphonate derivatives—and methods of their synthesis and use. These compounds are primarily aimed toward therapeutic applications, especially in modulating enzymes such as phosphatases.

The patent was filed in 1999, reflecting early 2000s innovation in phosphonate chemistry, with potential implications across antiviral, anticancer, and enzyme inhibition domains.


Claims Analysis: Scope and Language

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

The patent's claims consist of:

  • Independent claims: Defining broad classes of carbamoylphosphonate compounds with specific structural features.
  • Dependent claims: Narrowing elements, focusing on particular substituents, methods, or uses.

Analyzing the claims reveals a strategic balance between broad coverage meant to encompass a wide chemical space and narrower claims tailored toward specific derivatives.

Key Elements of the Claims

  1. Chemical Structural Scope
    The core chemical scaffold centers on carbamoylphosphonate moieties, with variations in side groups, substituents, and stereochemistry. The claims specify a general formula with permissible R, R', and X groups, offering extensive coverage over subclasses of the compounds.

  2. Use in Therapeutics
    The claims articulate the compounds’ use as enzyme inhibitors, notably phosphatases, with potential therapeutic relevance across viral, cancer, and inflammatory contexts.

  3. Methods of Synthesis
    The patent claims cover specific synthetic methodologies for generating the compounds, which bolster the patent’s enforceability by tying compounds to their production methods.

Claim Scope Assessment

  • Breadth: The broad independent claims encompass a wide array of chemical structures, potentially covering numerous derivatives within the carbamoylphosphonate class. This broader scope protects generic variants but risks limitations if prior art predates the filing.

  • Narrower Claims: The dependent claims specify particular substituents and configurations, which serve as fallback positions in litigation or licensing negotiations.

  • Ambiguities and Limitations: The claims are dependent on the clarity of chemical definitions. As with many chemical patents, the scope hinges on the precision of the structural formulas and the definitions of substituents.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Prior Art Context

Filed in 1999, the '540 patent entered a competitive landscape where phosphonate chemistry and enzyme inhibitors were active research areas. Existing patents cover various classes of phosphonate compounds, especially those targeting viral enzymes like HIV reverse transcriptase or cancer-related phosphatases.

Notably, prior art references such as U.S. Patent 5,962,461 and EPO patent applications from the late 1990s disclose similar phosphonate derivatives and related methods, challenging the novelty and non-obviousness of the '540 claims.

Related Patents and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

Within the patent landscape, several patents focus on phosphonate derivatives with antiviral or enzyme inhibitory functions. Companies like Gilead Sciences and Bayer hold extensive patent portfolios in antiviral phosphonates, potentially overlapping with the '540 patent’s scope when considering the broad chemical claims.

Consequently, practicing the claims without licensing risks infringing existing patents unless non-overlapping compounds or pathways are employed.

Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

The '540 patent’s family includes equivalents filed in Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions, expanding its global enforceability. The European counterpart, EPXXXXXXX, reinforces the ownership’s international strategy for protecting these compounds.


Legal Status and Enforcement

As of the latest available data, the '540 patent remains in force with no public record of litigation or challenge, suggesting a strong defensibility and ongoing commercial value. Its expiration is scheduled for 2020, following a standard patent term, unless extended via patent term adjustments or supplementary protection certificates.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • R&D Teams: Must evaluate whether their compounds fall within the broad structural scope of the claims, especially when designing carbamoylphosphonate-based inhibitors.
  • Legal and Licensing: Entities should conduct freedom-to-operate assessments and monitor potential infringing activity or licensing opportunities.
  • Patent Strategists: Should consider supplementing with secondary patents covering specific derivatives, formulations, or novel uses to extend protection or carve out unique market niches.

Conclusion: Scope and Strategic Patent Position

United States Patent 6,528,540 broadly claims carbamoylphosphonate derivatives with specific structural features suitable for enzyme inhibition, predominantly aimed at therapeutic applications. Its expansive claims provide substantial coverage over a chemically diverse class, subject to prior art limitations. The patent landscape features overlapping entities and prior filings, necessitating diligent freedom-to-operate analyses.

The '540 patent’s lifespan and enforceability were significant until patent expiration in 2020, after which generic development likely increased. Nonetheless, its foundational chemical and methodological disclosures continue to influence subsequent innovation and patent filings in the phosphonate drug space.


Key Takeaways

  • The '540 patent's broad claims encompass a wide spectrum of carbamoylphosphonate derivatives, securing extensive protection but requiring careful infringement analysis.
  • Its strategic positioning within a crowded patent landscape underscores the importance of specific patent claims and geographic coverage.
  • Post-expiration, the patents’ protected compounds are open for generic development, emphasizing the need for ongoing innovation to maintain competitive advantage.
  • For companies developing enzyme inhibitors, understanding the scope of the '540 patent informs design-around strategies and licensing negotiations.
  • The patent illustrates how chemical and method claims synergistically protect pharmaceutical innovations, shaping competitive dynamics.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical invention covered by U.S. Patent 6,528,540?
It covers carbamoylphosphonate derivatives, chemical compounds designed as enzyme inhibitors, with broad structural claims defining various substituents and configurations.

2. How does the scope of the claims impact freedom-to-operate analyses?
The broad claims necessitate thorough analysis to avoid infringing similar compounds in the market, especially given overlapping prior art and existing patents in phosphonate chemistry.

3. Are the patents related to this one still enforceable?
As the '540 patent expired in 2020, its protection ended, allowing for generic development unless supplementary protections are granted or new patents filed.

4. What strategies can innovators adopt considering the patent landscape?
Focusing on novel derivatives outside the scope of existing claims, developing new synthesis methods, or targeting different therapeutic applications are effective approaches.

5. How does this patent influence ongoing research in phosphonate therapeutics?
It provides a foundational framework, but recent innovations are required to avoid infringement and to advance the field beyond existing protected compounds.


References

  1. US Patent 6,528,540. Carbamoylphosphonate derivatives and their use. (2003).
  2. Prior art references and patent family filings as publicly available.
  3. Legal and patent status databases (e.g., USPTO, EPO).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,528,540

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.