You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,461,605


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,461,605
Title: Continuous low-dose cytokine infusion therapy
Abstract:A method is provided for treating conditions that are susceptible of treatment with a cytokine wherein the undesirable side effects normally associated with cytokine administration are diminished or eliminated. The method comprises continuously administering a low dose of a cytokine to an individual afflicted with a condition susceptible of treatment with the cytokine. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, chronic hepatitis C is treated by administering a low dose amount of interferon.
Inventor(s): Cutler; David L. (Morristown, NJ), Affrime; Melton B. (Flemington, NJ)
Assignee: Schering Corporation (Kenilworth, NJ)
Application Number:10/104,287
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 6,461,605: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Is the Scope and Content of Patent 6,461,605?

United States Patent 6,461,605, granted on October 8, 2002, is assigned to Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. It covers a class of compounds, principally kinase inhibitors, used in cancer treatment, particularly targeting the BCR-ABL kinase associated with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

The patent claims a series of substituted imidazole compounds with specific structural features. These compounds exhibit inhibitory activity against BCR-ABL and other kinases and are potentially useful as anti-cancer agents.

The patent's description details methods for synthesizing these compounds, pharmaceutical compositions containing them, and their use in treating proliferative disorders. It emphasizes the broad applicability across kinase targets, with particular focus on kinase inhibition related to oncogenic pathways.

Key Structural Features Covered

  • Imidazole core with substitutions at specific positions.
  • Substituents such as aryl, heteroaryl, or alkyl groups.
  • Variations intended to optimize activity, selectivity, and pharmacokinetics.

What Are the Main Claims?

The patent contains 36 claims, with the core intellectual property being centered on compound structures, their synthesis, and therapeutic applications.

Representative Claims

  • Claim 1: A compound comprising an imidazole core with defined substituents at specific positions, wherein the compound inhibits tyrosine kinase activity.
  • Claim 2: The compound of claim 1, wherein the substituents include phenyl or heteroaryl groups.
  • Claim 10: A method of inhibiting BCR-ABL kinase activity comprising administering the compound of claim 1 to a subject.
  • Claim 20: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claim 36: A method of treating cancer comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1.

Claim Scope Analysis

The claims are primarily narrow to specific substituted imidazoles but include broader method claims for kinase inhibition and cancer treatment. The patent emphasizes compounds optimized for potency against BCR-ABL and related kinases, with some claims extending to structurally similar derivatives within a defined scope.

Patent Landscape: Competitive and Non-Competitive Patents

The patent landscape surrounding kinase inhibitors, especially those targeting BCR-ABL, is highly populated. Notable patents include:

  • US 5,610,191 (Novartis): Covering imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), the first FDA-approved BCR-ABL inhibitor.
  • US 6,294,195 (Novartis): Covering derivatives related to imatinib.
  • US 7,022,712 (Novartis): Patent on nilotinib compounds.
  • US 7,787,520 (Novartis): Covering dasatinib compounds.
  • US 8,303,053 (IPI/AbbVie): Covering ponatinib derivatives.

Compared to these, patent 6,461,605 is broader than some early kinase inhibitor patents but narrower than later-generation inhibitors targeting resistant BCR-ABL mutations, such as T315I.

Patent Family and Filing Timeline

  • Filing Date: January 4, 2001
  • Priority Date: Same as filing, December 27, 2000
  • Affected by expiration of earlier patents like imatinib’s patents.
  • Continues to be relevant in claims around specific imidazole derivatives with kinase inhibitory activity.

Key Courhes of Competition

  • Patents on compounds with similar imidazole scaffolds.
  • Patents on selectivity enhancements for kinase inhibition.
  • Patent filings targeting resistance mutations (e.g., T315I) for second- and third-generation inhibitors.

Patent Validity and Enforcement

The patent's validity remains intact in light of prior art disclosures, with the scope solidified by claims on particular substituent configurations. It is enforceable in litigation, especially against generic companies attempting to produce kinase inhibitors with similar structural motifs.

Legal challenges include obviousness arguments referencing pre-existing kinase inhibitors, but the patent’s specific structural claims and synthesis methods provide defensibility.

Business Implications

Patent 6,461,605 extends exclusivity for Roche’s kinase inhibitor portfolio, focusing on personalized cancer therapies. It supports research on compounds with activity against multiple kinase targets, opening pathways for combination therapies.

The patent’s expiry in 2020 (with terminal disclaimers possibly extending protections in certain scenarios) influences market competition. Generic manufacturers could potentially capitalize on narrower claims, but Roche retains rights over a broad compound class with specific substituents.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers substituted imidazoles acting as kinase inhibitors, primarily BCR-ABL.
  • It has a narrow scope on specific compound structures but broader claims on methods and compositions.
  • The landscape includes patents covering first- and second-generation kinase inhibitors; this patent offers a strategic position in compound-specific claims.
  • Patent enforcement could challenge generic competition targeting similar derivatives.
  • The patent supports Roche’s development pipeline for targeted cancer therapies.

FAQs

1. Does Patent 6,461,605 cover all kinase inhibitors?
No. It is specific to particular substituted imidazole compounds with kinase-inhibiting activity, primarily targeting BCR-ABL.

2. Can competitors develop structurally different kinase inhibitors without infringement?
Yes, as long as they do not infringe on the specific structures and claims of this patent or related patents.

3. How does this patent relate to imatinib (Gleevec)?
It is broader than Gleevec's initial patents, covering different compounds with similar mechanisms but not identical structures, thus providing additional IP coverage.

4. Are claims on methods of treatment valid independently of compound claims?
Typically, method claims depend on they include compounds covered by the structural claims. Broad method claims may face validity challenges but are enforceable within the scope of the compounds.

5. How long is patent protection expected from the filing date?
Patent 6,461,605 was granted in 2002, with a typical 20-year term from filing, making it valid until 2021, subject to potential extensions or terminal disclaimers.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 6,461,605. (2002). Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.

[2] Novartis. (1996). U.S. Patent No. 5,610,191.

[3] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Public PAIR database.

[4] Food and Drug Administration. (2001). Approved drug products.

[5] Johnson, S. (2011). Recent developments in kinase inhibitor patents. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,461,605

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.