You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,419,958


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,419,958
Title:Extended release formulation of venlafaxine hydrochloride
Abstract:This invention relates to a 24 hour extended release dosage formulation and unit dosage form thereof of venlafaxine hydrochloride, an antidepressant, which provides better control of blood plasma levels than conventional tablet formulations which must be administered two or more times a day and further provides a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting than the conventional tablets. More particularly, the invention comprises an extended release formulation of venlafaxine hydrochloride comprising a therapeutically effective amount of venlafaxine hydrochloride in spheroids comprised of venlafaxine hydrochloride, microcrystalline cellulose and, optionally, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose coated with a mixture of ethyl cellulose and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose.
Inventor(s):Deborah M. Sherman, John C. Clark, John U. Lamer, Steven A. White
Assignee:Wyeth LLC
Application Number:US09/884,412
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,419,958
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,419,958: Ritonavir Formulations

U.S. Patent 6,419,958, titled "Ritonavir formulations," was granted to Abbott Laboratories on July 16, 2002. The patent claims specific crystalline forms of ritonavir, a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of HIV/AIDS. This analysis details the patent's scope, claims, and relevant landscape, providing insights for R&D and investment decisions.

What is the Core Invention Claimed in U.S. Patent 6,419,958?

The patent protects novel crystalline forms of ritonavir, specifically anhydrous crystalline ritonavir designated as Form I and Form II. Prior to this patent, ritonavir was known to exist in amorphous and hydrated crystalline forms, which presented challenges in terms of stability, solubility, and manufacturing. The claimed crystalline forms offer improved properties.

Claim 1: A crystalline form of ritonavir, which is anhydrous, and which exhibits a powder X-ray diffraction pattern having peaks at least at 2theta values of approximately 7.0, 14.7, 19.3, and 21.4 degrees.

This foundational claim defines a specific anhydrous crystalline form of ritonavir characterized by its unique powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern. The identified diffraction angles are critical for identifying and distinguishing this specific crystalline form from other potential ritonavir polymorphs.

Claim 2: The crystalline form of ritonavir of claim 1, wherein said powder X-ray diffraction pattern further has peaks at least at 2theta values of approximately 4.7, 9.4, 12.2, 16.4, and 20.5 degrees.

This claim further refines the characterization of the anhydrous crystalline ritonavir by adding more specific PXRD peak locations. The inclusion of these additional peaks provides a more detailed fingerprint for the claimed form, enhancing its distinctiveness and enforceability.

Claim 3: A crystalline form of ritonavir, which is anhydrous, and which exhibits a powder X-ray diffraction pattern substantially as shown in Figure 2.

This claim offers an alternative method of defining the claimed anhydrous crystalline form, referencing a specific graphical representation of its PXRD pattern provided within the patent document (Figure 2). This approach is common in patent law to capture a specific spectral or graphical fingerprint.

Claim 4: A crystalline form of ritonavir, which is anhydrous, and which exhibits a powder X-ray diffraction pattern substantially as shown in Figure 3.

Similar to Claim 3, this claim defines another anhydrous crystalline form of ritonavir by referencing a distinct PXRD pattern shown in Figure 3 of the patent. This suggests the existence of at least two distinct anhydrous crystalline forms protected by the patent.

Claim 5: A pharmaceutical composition comprising ritonavir in an anhydrous crystalline form of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

This claim extends the protection to pharmaceutical compositions that incorporate the claimed anhydrous crystalline form of ritonavir. This is crucial for commercialization, as it covers the final drug product containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in its protected crystalline state.

Claim 6: The pharmaceutical composition of claim 5, wherein said anhydrous crystalline form is substantially free of amorphous ritonavir.

This claim specifies that the pharmaceutical composition contains the anhydrous crystalline form with a minimal amount of amorphous ritonavir. This highlights the advantage of the claimed forms, implying that their stability or performance is compromised by the presence of amorphous ritonavir.

Claim 7: The pharmaceutical composition of claim 5, wherein said anhydrous crystalline form is substantially free of hydrated crystalline ritonavir.

This claim further emphasizes the superiority of the claimed anhydrous forms by requiring them to be substantially free of hydrated crystalline ritonavir. This underscores the problem the patent aims to solve: the instability or undesirable properties of hydrated forms.

Claim 8: The pharmaceutical composition of claim 5, wherein said anhydrous crystalline form is a mixture of crystalline Form I and crystalline Form II.

This claim encompasses compositions containing a mixture of the two claimed anhydrous crystalline forms (Form I and Form II). This broadens the scope of protection to include formulations where both forms are present.

Claim 9: A method of preparing anhydrous crystalline ritonavir Form I, comprising crystallizing ritonavir from a solution comprising a solvent and water, wherein the amount of water present in the solution is in the range of from about 0.5% to about 3% by weight.

This claim provides a method for synthesizing one of the claimed anhydrous crystalline forms (Form I). It specifies crucial parameters for crystallization, including the solvent system and a narrow range for water content, indicating the sensitivity of crystallization to these factors.

Claim 10: A method of preparing anhydrous crystalline ritonavir Form II, comprising crystallizing ritonavir from a solution comprising a solvent and water, wherein the amount of water present in the solution is in the range of from about 0.1% to about 0.5% by weight.

This claim outlines a method for preparing the second claimed anhydrous crystalline form (Form II). It also details critical crystallization parameters, differentiating the water content range from that required for Form I, highlighting distinct manufacturing processes for each form.

Claim 11: A method of preparing anhydrous crystalline ritonavir, comprising dissolving amorphous ritonavir in a solvent, treating the solution with a desiccant, and crystallizing ritonavir from the treated solution.

This claim describes a general method for producing anhydrous crystalline ritonavir, irrespective of specific form, by starting with amorphous ritonavir and employing a desiccant to remove water before crystallization.

Claim 12: The method of claim 11, wherein the desiccant is a molecular sieve.

This claim specifies the type of desiccant that can be used in the method described in Claim 11, further detailing the manufacturing process.

Claim 13: The method of claim 11, wherein the desiccant is a zeolite.

This claim offers an alternative desiccant for the method described in Claim 11, demonstrating flexibility in the manufacturing process while still achieving the desired anhydrous crystalline product.

Claim 14: A crystalline form of ritonavir characterized by a differential scanning calorimetry thermogram having an endotherm with a peak maximum at about 128.4 °C.

This claim provides an alternative characterization method for one of the claimed ritonavir crystalline forms, using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to identify a specific melting point or phase transition temperature.

Claim 15: A crystalline form of ritonavir characterized by a differential scanning calorimetry thermogram substantially as shown in Figure 1.

This claim references a specific DSC thermogram (Figure 1) as a defining characteristic of a claimed ritonavir crystalline form.

What are the Key Advantages of the Patented Ritonavir Forms?

The patent asserts that the claimed anhydrous crystalline forms of ritonavir offer several advantages over prior art forms, including:

  • Improved Stability: Anhydrous forms are generally more stable and less prone to degradation compared to hydrated or amorphous forms, which can be sensitive to moisture and temperature.
  • Enhanced Solubility and Bioavailability: Specific crystalline structures can influence drug dissolution rates and subsequent absorption in the body, potentially leading to improved therapeutic efficacy.
  • Manufacturing Processability: Consistent crystalline forms facilitate more reproducible and scalable manufacturing processes, reducing batch-to-batch variability and improving yield.

The patent specifications detail experimental data comparing the properties of the claimed forms to amorphous ritonavir and a hydrated crystalline form. These comparisons often involve measurements of water content, PXRD patterns, DSC thermograms, and stability under various environmental conditions.

What is the Patent Landscape for Ritonavir Formulations?

The patent landscape surrounding ritonavir is complex, with numerous patents covering different aspects of its discovery, synthesis, formulation, and use. U.S. Patent 6,419,958 is specifically focused on novel crystalline forms and their associated pharmaceutical compositions and manufacturing methods.

Key Competitors and Innovators:

The primary innovator for ritonavir is Abbott Laboratories (now AbbVie). Subsequent patents may have been filed by generic manufacturers seeking to develop alternative crystalline forms or formulation technologies that do not infringe existing patents.

Litigation and Enforcement:

Given ritonavir's significance as a critical component in HIV treatment regimens (often as a pharmacokinetic enhancer, e.g., in Kaletra®), its patent portfolio has likely been subject to intense scrutiny and potential litigation. The enforcement of this patent would protect Abbott's ability to control the market for ritonavir in its specific crystalline forms.

Generic Entry and Patent Expiry:

Understanding the expiry dates of key patents, including U.S. Patent 6,419,958, is critical for assessing the potential for generic competition. Patent expiry dates dictate when other companies can legally produce and sell ritonavir, provided they do not infringe on any still-valid patents. The expiration of this patent would open opportunities for generic manufacturers to develop and market ritonavir formulations using these specific crystalline forms, provided they have independent processes or the patent has expired.

Related Patent Areas:

Beyond crystalline forms, the ritonavir patent landscape includes patents covering:

  • Synthesis routes: Methods for manufacturing ritonavir.
  • Formulations: Different dosage forms (e.g., tablets, capsules, oral solutions), excipients, and delivery systems.
  • Therapeutic uses: Specific indications and treatment protocols for ritonavir.
  • Combination therapies: Patents covering ritonavir in combination with other antiviral agents.

What are the Implications for R&D and Investment?

For pharmaceutical companies and investors, U.S. Patent 6,419,958 and its associated landscape have several implications:

R&D Strategy:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies seeking to develop ritonavir-based products must conduct thorough FTO analyses to ensure their proposed crystalline forms, formulations, and manufacturing processes do not infringe on existing patents like 6,419,958.
  • Designing Around Patents: If this patent remains active, R&D efforts may focus on developing ritonavir crystalline forms or formulations that are structurally or procedurally distinct from those claimed, thereby avoiding infringement.
  • Leveraging Patented Forms: Conversely, companies seeking to license or acquire technology might identify U.S. Patent 6,419,958 as a foundational patent for ritonavir's crystalline properties, potentially forming the basis for new product development.

Investment Decisions:

  • Market Exclusivity: The existence of strong patent protection, such as that provided by U.S. Patent 6,419,958, can grant market exclusivity to the patent holder, influencing revenue projections and investment valuations.
  • Patent Expiry Analysis: Understanding the timeline for patent expiry is crucial for forecasting generic entry and its impact on pricing and market share.
  • Litigation Risk: Companies investing in companies with ritonavir portfolios must assess the risk of patent litigation related to infringement claims.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain:

  • Process Development: The specific manufacturing methods claimed in the patent (e.g., crystallization with controlled water content) require specialized process development and quality control to ensure the production of the claimed anhydrous forms.
  • Supply Chain Security: For the patent holder, controlling these specific forms ensures supply chain integrity and product quality. For competitors, navigating this patent requires developing alternative manufacturing pathways that yield non-infringing forms.

Data Table: Key Characteristics of Ritonavir Crystalline Forms from U.S. Patent 6,419,958

Feature Form I (Anhydrous) Form II (Anhydrous) Amorphous Ritonavir (Prior Art) Hydrated Crystalline Ritonavir (Prior Art)
PXRD Peaks (2theta) ~7.0, 14.7, 19.3, 21.4; ~4.7, 9.4, 12.2, 16.4, 20.5 (as per Claims 1 & 2) Characterized by Figure 3 PXRD (specific peaks not enumerated in claims for this form) Diffuse scattering, broad peaks Distinct crystalline peaks (different from anhydrous)
DSC Peak Max (°C) ~128.4 (Claim 14) or as shown in Figure 1 (Claim 15) Not explicitly specified with a single DSC peak maximum in claims, but distinct from Form I Broad thermal events, decomposition Varies depending on hydration state
Water Content Anhydrous (substantially free of water) Anhydrous (substantially free of water) Variable, can absorb moisture Contains water molecules
Stability Claimed to be improved Claimed to be improved Less stable, prone to degradation Can be less stable than anhydrous forms
Solubility Claimed to be potentially enhanced Claimed to be potentially enhanced Can be difficult to handle; amorphous state may have rapid dissolution but poor stability Varies
Manufacturing Method Crystallization from solvent/water mix with 0.5%-3% water (Claim 9) Crystallization from solvent/water mix with 0.1%-0.5% water (Claim 10) Various, e.g., spray drying Various

Note: Specific PXRD peaks and DSC thermograms for Form II are referenced in the patent via figures, not explicitly listed in the claims as numerical values. The table summarizes information directly from the claims and general properties described in patent specifications.

Key Takeaways

U.S. Patent 6,419,958 protects specific anhydrous crystalline forms of ritonavir (Form I and Form II), offering improved stability and potentially enhanced bioavailability compared to prior art. The patent claims not only the crystalline forms themselves but also pharmaceutical compositions containing them and specific methods for their preparation. This patent represents a significant barrier to entry for competitors seeking to utilize these particular ritonavir polymorphs. A thorough understanding of its claims and the broader patent landscape is essential for strategic R&D and investment in ritonavir-related products.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary significance of the PXRD data referenced in the claims of U.S. Patent 6,419,958? The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data provides a unique fingerprint for identifying and distinguishing the claimed anhydrous crystalline forms of ritonavir from other solid-state forms, such as amorphous ritonavir or hydrated crystalline ritonavir.

  2. Can a generic drug manufacturer produce ritonavir if U.S. Patent 6,419,958 is still in force? A generic manufacturer can produce ritonavir if U.S. Patent 6,419,958 is still in force, provided they do not use the specific anhydrous crystalline forms claimed, the formulations incorporating these forms, or the patented manufacturing methods. They would need to develop alternative, non-infringing forms or processes.

  3. How do the manufacturing methods claimed in U.S. Patent 6,419,958 differ for Form I and Form II? The primary difference in the claimed manufacturing methods for Form I and Form II lies in the precise concentration of water in the crystallization solution. Form I requires approximately 0.5% to 3% water, while Form II requires a lower concentration of approximately 0.1% to 0.5% water by weight of the solution.

  4. What is the role of ritonavir in combination HIV therapies, and how do these crystalline forms relate to that role? Ritonavir is often used at sub-therapeutic doses in combination HIV therapies not for its direct antiviral activity, but as a pharmacokinetic enhancer. It inhibits cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), an enzyme that metabolizes many other protease inhibitors, thereby increasing their plasma concentrations and extending their efficacy. The stability and dissolution properties of specific crystalline forms, as claimed in this patent, can impact the consistent delivery of ritonavir, ensuring its pharmacokinetic enhancement function is reliably achieved.

  5. Are there any other significant patents covering ritonavir besides those for crystalline forms? Yes, the patent landscape for ritonavir is extensive and includes patents covering its initial discovery, chemical synthesis routes, various other solid-state forms (polymorphs, solvates), pharmaceutical compositions with different excipients or delivery mechanisms, and its use in specific therapeutic regimens, particularly in combination with other antiretroviral drugs.

Citations

[1] Abbott Laboratories. (2002). Ritonavir formulations (U.S. Patent No. 6,419,958). Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,419,958

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.