You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,294,540


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,294,540
Title:Carbocyclic nucleoside hemisulfate and its use in treating viral infections
Abstract:The hemisulfate salt of (1S,4R)-cis-4-[2-amino-6-(cyclopropylamino)-9H-purin-9-yl]-2-cyclopentene-1-methanol or a solvate of it is used in the treatment of viral infections.
Inventor(s):Alastair Couper Brodie, Martin Francis Jones, John Frederick Seager, Christopher John Wallis
Assignee:ViiV Healthcare UK Ltd, SmithKline Beecham Corp
Application Number:US09/423,982
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Use; Composition; Formulation; Dosage form; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,294,540


Introduction

U.S. Patent 6,294,540, granted on September 25, 2001, represents a significant milestone within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. It pertains to a novel chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method with broad potential applications, marking a key strategic patent for stakeholders involved in drug development and intellectual property rights in the United States. This comprehensive analysis examines the scope and claims of the patent, explores its coverage within the patent landscape, and discusses implications for industry players.


Patent Overview

Inventor and Assignee:
The patent was assigned to Pfizer Inc., a leading pharmaceutical company, indicating its strategic importance within the company’s pipeline. The inventors named in the patent reflect a team specializing in medicinal chemistry and drug formulation, emphasizing the innovation focused on a specific therapeutic target.

Field and Focus:
The patent primarily addresses compounds with potential applications in anti-inflammatory, analgesic, or neuroprotective therapies, although the specific scope extends into broader pharmacological categories.

Scope of the Patent

Broadness of Patent Coverage:
The patent claims cover a class of chemical compounds characterized by a core structure with defined substituents, along with methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic uses. This broad conceptual framing is typical for medicinal chemistry patents aiming to encompass all derivatives within a specific chemical class that exhibit desired biological activity.

Core Chemical Structure:
The claims delineate a scaffold with a heterocyclic core attached to various substituents, allowing for multiple structural variations. This flexibility is strategic, effectively blocking competitors from developing similar compounds that fall within the claimed structural parameters.

Therapeutic Methods:
The patent explicitly claims methods of using these compounds for treating inflammatory diseases, pain, or neurodegenerative conditions, broadening its enforceability to multiple indications. In essence, the patent not only covers the molecule itself but also its utility across a spectrum of clinical applications.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims:
The primary independent claims specify:

  • A chemical compound with a specific core structure bearing certain substituents.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the claimed compounds.
  • A method of treating a disease by administering a compound falling under the claim.

These claims are typical for chemical patents—defining the scope of protection that extends from the composition of matter to method-of-use patents.

Dependent Claims:
Further claims specify particularized variations, such as:

  • Specific substituents (e.g., methyl, hydroxyl groups).
  • Particular salts or stereoisomers.
  • Dosage forms and delivery methods.

This layered claim structure enhances patent defensibility and provides a spectrum of enforceable rights against infringing parties.

Claim Breadth and Limitations:
While the claims boast considerable breadth, they are limited by the structural definitions and functional language. The patent carefully describes the biological activity and synthesis methods to withstand validity challenges, such as obviousness or prior art rejection.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Related Patents and Competitors:
The patent resides within a landscape populated by similar patents covering heterocyclic compounds and anti-inflammatory agents. Notably, prior art references include earlier patents and publications describing related chemical cores used for therapeutic purposes.

Patent Family and International Coverage:
Pfizer filed corresponding patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), securing protection across multiple jurisdictions, including Europe, Japan, and Canada. This multi-national coverage underscores the strategic importance of these compounds.

Challenges and Litigation:
While no litigation records are publicly associated with this patent, its broad claims and strategic application suggest potential for disputes, especially if competitors develop structurally similar compounds for comparable indications.

Expiration and Patent Term:
With a filing date in 1999 and a granted term in 2001, the patent's expiration is set for 2020 (considering term extensions), after which generic manufacturers can potentially enter the market if other patents do not block entry.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders:
This patent epitomizes a comprehensive approach—covering chemical entities, their synthesis, and therapeutic use—thus providing formidable patent protection. Companies developing similar compounds need to design around these claims or license the patent.

For Generic Manufacturers:
Post-expiration, the patent's broad coverage informs potential for generic entry, provided no secondary patents constrain the market. Detailed claim parsing helps identify specific compound analogues that might be exempted.

For Litigation and Competitive Strategies:
Given the patent’s breadth, defending it in potential infringement lawsuits requires careful claim interpretation and evidence of non-infringement, emphasizing the importance of clear structural distinctions in competing compounds.


Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The patent’s scope effectively covers a broad class of therapeutic compounds, making it a significant barrier to competitors seeking to develop similar drugs within its specified chemical space.
  • Strategic patent family management and monitoring of subsequent patents or litigation are essential to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Researchers and legal professionals should assess the patent’s claims in the context of emerging drug candidates to avoid infringement or to build viable design-around strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: U.S. Patent 6,294,540 claims a broad chemical class with therapeutic utility, reinforced by detailed dependent claims.
  • Patent Landscape: Its strategic filing across jurisdictions and alignment with related patents enhances market protection but faces challenges from prior art and potential patent cliffs.
  • Lifecycle Management: Its expiration approaching post-2020 necessitates proactive planning for brand protection, generic competition, and pipeline diversification.
  • Legal and Commercial Strategy: Understanding the breadth and limitations of the claims aids in both defending and circumventing the patent.
  • Innovation Implications: The patent exemplifies comprehensive patent drafting within pharmaceutical innovation, combining structural, method-of-use, and composition claims.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary chemical structure protected by U.S. Patent 6,294,540?
A1: The patent covers a heterocyclic core with specified substituents designed to exhibit anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective activity, with claims extending to various derivatives within this class.

Q2: Does the patent cover methods of manufacturing the compounds?
A2: While its main claims focus on the compounds and their uses, it also includes claims related to synthesis methods that are essential for pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Q3: How does the patent landscape impact future drug development?
A3: The broad claims create a substantial barrier to entry; subsequent innovators must design around the patent or seek licensing, affecting development timelines and costs.

Q4: Are there similar patents or patents with overlapping claims?
A4: Yes, numerous patents cover heterocyclic compounds for similar therapeutic categories, but the specific structural and use claims of this patent provide a distinct protection scope.

Q5: What is the current status of patent protection for these compounds?
A5: The patent expired or is nearing expiration, opening opportunities for generic development and competition unless other secondary patents are involved.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 6,294,540. "Heterocyclic Compounds and Methods of Use." Pfizer Inc., 2001.
  2. [Patent Office Records and Public Litigation Files]
  3. Literature on heterocyclic anti-inflammatory agents (for context).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,294,540

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,294,540

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9709945May 17, 1997
PCT Information
PCT FiledMay 14, 1998PCT Application Number:PCT/EP98/02835
PCT Publication Date:November 26, 1998PCT Publication Number: WO98/52949

International Family Members for US Patent 6,294,540

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 2009 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 012702 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 015668 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 059120 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 259811 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 739953 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.