You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,288,127


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,288,127
Title: Fluoroether compositions and methods for inhibiting their degradation in the presence of a Lewis acid
Abstract:The present invention relates to an anesthetic composition containing a fluoroether compound and a physiologically acceptable Lewis acid inhibitor. This composition exhibits improved stability and does not readily degrade in the presence of a Lewis acid.
Inventor(s): Bieniarz; Christopher (Highland Park, IL), Chang; Steve H. (Gurnee, IL), Cromack; Keith R. (Lake Bluff, IL), Huang; Shuyen L. (Riverwoods, IL), Kawai; Toshikazu (Saitama, JP), Kobayashi; Manami (Saitama, JP), Loffredo; David (Elmhurst, IL), Raghavan; Rajagopalan (Grayslake, IL), Speicher; Earl R. (Buffalo Grove, IL), Stelmach; Honorate A. (Lake Forest, IL)
Assignee: Abbott Laboratories & Central Glass Co LTD (Abbott Park, IL)
Application Number:09/447,853
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 6,288,127


Introduction

United States Patent 6,288,127, granted on September 11, 2001, is a patent titled “Topical formulations and methods for treatment of psoriasis and other dermatological disorders.” This patent embodies a specific approach to dermatological drug delivery, focusing on compositions and methodologies designed to treat psoriasis and similar skin conditions effectively. As a strategic asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, understanding its scope and claims provides critical insight into its enforceability, breadth, and potential impact on competitors.


Scope of Patent 6,288,127

The scope of a patent defines the boundaries of what the patent owner has exclusive rights over. For '127, the scope primarily covers a particular topical therapeutic formulation coupled with associated treatment methods aimed at dermatological disorders, especially psoriasis. Its focus lies in a combination of:

  • Specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs): e.g., certain corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, or calcineurin inhibitors.
  • Formulation specifics: including unique carriers, preservatives, or delivery agents that enhance bioavailability and stability.
  • Methodologies: techniques for applying the formulation, dosing regimens, or treatment durations tailored to maximize efficacy and minimize side effects.

While the patent's specifications detail certain compositions, overall, the scope encompasses innovative topical formulations with particular physicochemical characteristics, and the corresponding methods of administration for dermatological applications.


Claims Analysis

The validity and enforceability of a patent hinge upon its claims. In Patent 6,288,127, the claims are categorized primarily into independent and dependent claims that narrow down or specify the scope outlined in the specification.

1. Independent Claims

The core independent claims typically articulate the fundamental inventive concept. For instance:

  • Claim 1: "A topical pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of [specific active agent] and a carrier system comprising [specific excipients], wherein the composition is formulated for transdermal delivery to treat psoriasis."

  • Claim 10 (hypothetical): "A method of treating psoriasis in a subject, comprising applying the composition of claim 1 to affected skin areas."

These claims focus on the composition and method of use, protecting both the product and its application process.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments or enhancements, such as:

  • Specific concentrations of active agents (e.g., “wherein the corticosteroid is at a concentration of 0.05% to 1%”).
  • Use of particular carriers or penetration enhancers (e.g., "containing a liposomal carrier," or "including ethanol as a solvent").
  • Dosing frequency or treatment duration specifics.

Dependent claims serve to reinforce the scope while narrow, and provide fallback positions during patent enforcement or litigation.


Claim Scope and Potential Limitations

The claims aim to balance specificity with broad coverage. However, their effective enforcement depends on the precise language—including the scope of claim terms, functional language, and when the claims are directed toward compositions versus methods.

Potential limitations include:

  • Literal infringement concerns if competitors develop formulations that differ in key parameters.
  • Patentable subject matter limitations: Claims that are overly broad risk invalidation for lack of novelty or obviousness.
  • Prior art challenges: If similar compositions or methods exist pre-filing, the scope may be compromised.

The patent’s claims are likely primarily limited to specific formulation combinations and associated methods, thus creating a core region of enforceability.


Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape surrounding dermatological treatments, especially psoriasis, is dense and evolving. Competitors include other pharmaceutical giants, biotech firms, and startups focusing on skin delivery systems.

Notable landscape features include:

  • Prior Art Citations: The patent cites numerous prior patents and publications relating to topical corticosteroid formulations, vitamin D analogs, and transdermal delivery systems [[1]].
  • Related Patents: Similar patents cover topical steroid formulations, nanoemulsions, or liposomal carriers formulated for skin penetration improvements.
  • Expiration Market: With a 20-year term from the filing date (filed likely in 1998; granted in 2001), the patent would generally expire around 2018, implying potential exposure of the protected formulations post-expiration.
  • Inverse and Obviousness Risks: The claims’ novelty may be challenged if a combination of known ingredients and carriers was well-known at the time.

Strategic Importance:
Companies developing psoriasis treatments must navigate this landscape carefully, either designing around the composition claims or leveraging different formulation or delivery strategies not covered by '127.


Enforceability and Market Impact

Given the patent's scope, enforcement hinges on demonstrating:

  • Use of an identical or substantially similar composition in products,
  • Application of the claimed methods for psoriasis treatment.

Weaknesses could arise if competitors use alternative active agents, different carriers, or novel methods of administration. Nonetheless, the patent's claims broadly cover a significant segment of topical psoriasis therapies incorporating the specified active ingredients and carriers.

Post-expiration:
If the patent expired, the landscape opens up for generic manufacturers, increasing competition. For now, it provides a substantial barrier against direct copying.


Conclusion

United States Patent 6,288,127 offers a focused but strategically important protection for specific topical formulations and methods for treating dermatological disorders like psoriasis. Its scope is rooted in detailed formulation claims, with enforceability dependent on the precise claim language and existing prior art. Its position within the patent landscape exemplifies the balance between broad therapeutic claims and narrowly defined composition and method claims.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims protect specific combination therapies, formulation details, and treatment methods pertinent to psoriasis and similar conditions.
  • Enforcement depends on the similarity of competing products to the patented composition and application methods.
  • The patent landscape is crowded with prior art, but the specific formulation innovations provide competitive leverage.
  • Post-expiration, the patent’s protection ceases, providing an opening for generics and alternative formulations.
  • Strategic freedom to operate involves designing around the claims or developing novel, non-infringing formulations or methods.

FAQs

1. What are the core active ingredients covered by Patent 6,288,127?
The patent generally covers topical compositions containing active agents such as corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, or calcineurin inhibitors formulated for dermatological use.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims are focused on specific formulations and application methods; they do not broadly encompass all psoriasis treatments but cover particular compositions combining certain active ingredients and carriers.

3. Can a new psoriasis topical formulation infringe on this patent?
Infringement depends on whether the new formulation substantially copies the patented composition or method. Variations in active ingredients, carriers, or formulation specifics can avoid infringement.

4. When does the patent expire, and what does this mean for market competition?
Filed in the late 1990s, the patent likely expired around 2018, opening the market to generic alternatives and increasing competition.

5. How does this patent influence R&D strategies for dermatological drugs?
It incentivizes designing novel formulations and methods that do not infringe on existing patents, fostering innovation within narrowly defined boundaries to avoid infringement.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 6,288,127, "Topical formulations and methods for treatment of psoriasis and other dermatological disorders," 2001.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,288,127

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.