You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,284,770


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,284,770
Title:Medicaments for the treatment of non-constipated female irritable bowel syndrome
Abstract:This invention relates to the use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the treatment of nonconstipated female IBS patients.
Inventor(s):Allen Wayne Mangel, Allison Ruth Northcutt
Assignee:Sebela International Ltd
Application Number:US09/529,050
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,284,770
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,284,770


Introduction

U.S. Patent 6,284,770, granted on September 4, 2001, is a significant patent within the pharmaceutical nanotechnology sector. It pertains to compositions and methods involving lipid-based nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery. The patent reflects advancements in nanomedicine aimed at enhancing drug efficacy, lowering toxicity, and enabling site-specific therapeutic interventions. A comprehensive understanding of its claims, scope, and the related patent landscape is essential for pharmaceutical innovators, patent strategists, and competitive intelligence professionals.


Scope of U.S. Patent 6,284,770

The patent’s scope centers on lipid-based nanocarrier systems designed for delivering pharmaceutically active agents. Specifically, it emphasizes compositions comprising lipid vesicles, such as liposomes, that encapsulate drugs and are modified for improved targeting aspects. The scope extends to:

  • Lipid compositions including phospholipids, sterols, and other membrane constituents.
  • Methods of preparing these lipid vesicles with particular lipid ratios, sizes, and surface modifications.
  • Use of targeting ligands or surface modifications to direct the nanocarriers to specific tissues or cell types.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations incorporating these nanocarriers for treatment applications.

The patent’s scope is deliberately broad, encompassing various lipid compositions, preparation techniques, and functional modifications intended to optimize drug delivery.


Claims Analysis

The primary claims of U.S. Patent 6,284,770 define the inventive core. They can be classified into three categories: composition claims, method claims, and use claims.

1. Composition Claims

  • Lipid Vesicle Formulations: Claims describe lipid vesicles (e.g., liposomes) comprising specific phospholipids and sterols. For example, Claim 1 discloses a lipid vesicle with a phospholipid bilayer, a sterol component such as cholesterol, and an encapsulated drug.
  • Surface Modifications: Several claims specify vesicles with surface modifications like PEGylation or conjugation with targeting ligands (e.g., antibodies, peptides), which enhance circulation time or targeting specificity.
  • Size and Charge Parameters: Claims specify vesicles within certain size ranges (generally 50–200 nm) facilitating passage through biological barriers and reducing clearance.

2. Method Claims

  • Preparation Methods: Claims focus on methods for preparing lipid vesicles with controlled sizes and encapsulation efficiencies. Techniques include thin-film hydration, extrusion, sonication, and post-insertion of targeting ligands.
  • Surface Functionalization: Methods to attach targeting moieties, such as PEG chains or antibodies, are covered, emphasizing specificity and stability.

3. Use Claims

  • Therapeutic Application: Claims encompass uses of these lipid nanocarriers for delivering chemotherapeutic agents, genetic material, or diagnostic compounds to targeted tissues.
  • Disease-specific Indications: The patent includes claims directed at uses in cancer, infectious diseases, or inflammatory conditions, emphasizing therapeutic versatility.

Claim Scope and Infringement Considerations

The broad language of the composition and method claims provides extensive protection over lipid carrier formulations with specified components and modifications. However, innovations that deviate significantly in lipid types, sizes, or modifications may avoid infringement. The claims are particularly relevant for companies developing liposomal formulations, especially those with surface modifications for targeting or circulation enhancement.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Patent Family

U.S. Patent 6,284,770 is part of a larger patent family and is built upon prior art related to liposomes and lipid nanoparticle technology. Key prior art includes:

  • Liposome patents dating back to the 1980s, such as U.S. Patent 4,522,811 (Delta Lipid), which pioneered liposomal drug delivery.
  • PEGylated liposomes: Patent applications describing surface PEG modification emerged in the late 1990s, influencing the scope of claims in 6,284,770.
  • Targeted delivery: Patents covering ligand-conjugated liposomes, such as U.S. Patent 5,177,219, provide contextual background.

Competitive Landscape

Major players operating in this space include Gilead Sciences, Biogen Idec, ABL Bio, and various biotech startups. Their patent portfolios comprise both foundational liposomal technology and specific innovations like novel surface modifications, encapsulation techniques, or tissue-specific targeting strategies.

Claims of 6,284,770 overlap with or are challenged by subsequent patents that refine or broaden liposomal functionalities, notably in:

  • Stealth liposome formulations for prolonged circulation.
  • Ligand-targeted liposomes with improved targeting efficiencies.
  • Lipid compositions with enhanced stability or drug loading capacity.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

The broad scope of this patent invites legal scrutiny, especially concerning overlapping claims with newer patents. Courts and patent offices have examined similar patents for obviousness or insufficient novelty, often requiring narrow claim interpretation to avoid infringement or invalidity.


Implications for Industry

The patent’s claims secure foundational rights over lipid-based nanocarrier systems with surface modifications, influencing R&D strategies in nanomedicine. Companies developing liposomal drugs, especially in oncology and infectious diseases, reference this patent to assess freedom-to-operate and to design around its scope.

An increase in patent applications with similar lipid and surface-modification claims indicates ongoing innovation but also points to a crowded IP landscape where careful patent navigation is crucial.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Scope: U.S. Patent 6,284,770 claims a wide range of lipid vesicle compositions and methods, emphasizing targeted delivery through surface modification.
  • Robust Patent Position: It offers substantial protection for liposomal drug delivery systems involving specific lipid compositions and surface functionalizations, influencing subsequent innovations.
  • Landscape Complexity: The patent exists within a dense patent environment, with prior art and follow-up patents refining lipid nanocarrier technology.
  • Innovation Opportunities: To avoid infringement, competitors innovate around lipid types, surface modifications, or preparation methods; conversely, patent holders seek to strengthen claims through continuous innovation.
  • Strategic IP Management: Effectively navigating this patent landscape requires detailed freedom-to-operate analyses and potential licensing agreements for utilized technologies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive concept of U.S. Patent 6,284,770?
The patent primarily claims lipid vesicle compositions—especially liposomes—with surface modifications such as PEGylation or targeting ligands, optimized for targeted drug delivery.

2. Are the claims limited to specific lipids or formulations?
No; the claims are broad, covering various phospholipids, sterols, sizes, and surface modifications, allowing wide applicability.

3. How does this patent influence current liposomal drug development?
It sets a legal benchmark in nanocarrier technology, requiring developers to consider its claims for freedom-to-operate or to seek licenses when utilizing similar lipid-based delivery systems.

4. Can this patent be easily circumvented?
Yes; development of lipid nanocarriers with different lipid compositions, alternative surface modifications, or novel preparation methods may avoid infringement.

5. What recent legal challenges have impacted the scope of this patent?
While specific litigations are limited, subsequent patents and legal analyses have challenged or refined its claims, especially concerning the novelty of surface modifications and preparation methods.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 6,284,770, "Lipid vesicle compositions and methods," issued September 4, 2001.
[2] U.S. Patent 4,522,811, "Liposome with stabilized membrane," Delta Lipid.
[3] U.S. Patent 5,177,219, "Ligand targeted liposomes," [Patent related to ligand targeting].
[4] U.S. Patent 4,891,991, "PEGylated liposomes for prolonging circulation," [Prior art].
[5] Commercial literature and patent landscape analyses available through patent databases such as USPTO, Espacenet, and WIPO.


More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,284,770

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,284,770

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9721139Oct 07, 1997
PCT Information
PCT FiledOctober 05, 1998PCT Application Number:PCT/EP98/06278
PCT Publication Date:April 15, 1999PCT Publication Number: WO99/17755

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.