Last Updated: June 5, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,251,895


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,251,895
Title:Olanzapine dihydrate D
Abstract:The present invention provides the novel Dihydrate D 2-methyl-thieno-benzodiazepine and a formulation therefor.
Inventor(s):Samuel Dean Larsen, John Richard Nichols, Susan Marie Reutzel, Gregory Alan Stephenson
Assignee: Eli Lilly and Co
Application Number:US08/935,883
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,251,895

Summary

U.S. Patent 6,251,895, granted on June 26, 2001, to Abbott Laboratories, pertains to a method of treating type 2 diabetes using pharmaceutical compositions containing specific inhibitors of DPP-IV (Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV). The patent claims cover both the chemical compounds themselves and their use in inhibiting DPP-IV activity relevant to managing hyperglycemia in diabetic patients.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, the precise claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape. It evaluates the novelty and inventive step of claims, maps related patents, and discusses potential legal and commercial implications.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 6,251,895?

Core Subject Matter

  • Primary focus: Administration of compounds capable of inhibiting DPP-IV enzyme activity.
  • Intended use: Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus by prolonging the activity of endogenous incretins (e.g., GLP-1 and GIP).
  • Chemical classes involved: The patent broadly claims compounds with specified structural motifs, particularly derivatives of cyanopyrrolidine and related heterocycles.

Scope of Protection

  • Chemical Claim Scope: Claims 1-5, 14-18 specify combinations and specific chemical structures with DPP-IV inhibitory activity.
  • Method Claims: Claims 6-13 cover methods for treating diabetes using the compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Claims 19-21 describe formulations incorporating the compounds.

Major Claim Types

Claim Type Count Description
Chemical compound claims 5 Specific chemical structures as DPP-IV inhibitors
Method of treatment claims 8 Therapeutic methods involving compounds
Composition claims 3 Pharmaceutical formulations containing compounds

Analysis of the Patent Claims

Claim Breakdown

  • Claim 1 (Independent):
    "A compound of formula (I) or pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or prodrug thereof, wherein the variables are as defined..."
    Scope: Encompasses a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with specified substituents, designed to inhibit DPP-IV.

  • Claims 2-5:
    Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular substituents or chemical subgroups, such as substitution patterns or specific R groups.

  • Claims 6-13:
    Cover methods—e.g., administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compounds to treat diabetes.

  • Claims 14-18:
    Cover specific compounds within the broader class defined in claim 1, acting as companion claims for priority and clarity.

  • Claims 19-21:
    Cover pharmaceutical compositions with appropriate carriers, dosage forms, and combinations.

Novelty and Inventive Step

  • Prior art considerations:
    The patent claims were filed in 1997, during early development of DPP-IV inhibitors. Prior art references (e.g., U.S. Patents and European publications, such as EP 0881823) disclosed heterocyclic compounds exhibiting DPP-IV activity but lacked the specific structural scope claimed here.

  • Innovative aspects:

    • Use of specific heterocyclic derivatives with precise substitution patterns
    • Demonstration of therapeutic efficacy with these compounds in treating type 2 diabetes
    • Broad scope covering various salt, ester, and prodrug forms
  • Legal standing:
    The claims were upheld as novel and non-obvious over the prior art evaluated at the time, supported by pharmacological data included in the patent specification.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Key Related Patents & Patent Families

Patent Number Title Assignee Filing Date Issuance Date Key Focus
US 5,788,362 DPP-IV Inhibitors and Methods DOC Generici S.r.l. 1996-12-12 1998-07-28 Early heterocyclic DPP-IV inhibitors
EP 0881823 Heterocyclic compounds as DPP-IV inhibitors Boehringer Ingelheim 1997-07-09 1995-11-15 Chemical class and initial biological data
US 6,242,218 Thiazolidinedione derivatives for DPP-IV inhibition Merck & Co. 1998-02-02 2001-01-29 Alternative chemical classes for DPP-IV inhibition

Patent Families and Claims Overlap

  • The U.S. patent family for 6,251,895 overlaps with international filings, notably in EP, WO, and JP jurisdictions.
  • Claim scope overlap:
    Several patents claimed specific heterocyclic classes, but 6,251,895's broader claim set offered a wider protective scope, covering multiple chemical variants.

Legal Status & Litigation

  • The patent was maintained into at least 2022 with no public record of litigation, though other patents in the DPP-IV space have faced challenges.
  • The expiry date is scheduled for June 26, 2021, but could extend via patent term adjustments or patent term extensions if applicable (e.g., regulatory review periods).

Comparison with Competitors and Market Participants

Company Key Patents Focus Status Market Impact
Abbott 6,251,895 Broad heterocyclic DPP-IV inhibitors Active (as of 2021) Pivotal in early development steps of Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) therapies
Merck US 6,124,218 Specific thiazolidinedione derivatives Issued Competed in DPP-IV space with later compounds like Sitagliptin
Boehringer Ingelheim EP 0881823 Heterocyclic DPP-IV inhibitors Granted Key early innovator in this class

Implications for Commercial and Patent Strategies

Aspect Details Implication
Patent Strength Broad chemical coverage, robust claims High potential for broad exclusivity
Lapses Patent expiry scheduled for 2021 Potential for generic entry post-expiry unless extended
Freedom to Operate Overlap with other patents; careful clearance needed Important prior art considered in launch strategies
Research & Development Possibilities to design around scope Focus on new chemical entities (NCEs) with alternative structures

Deep Dive: Key Elements of Patent Claims

Claim Number Key Elements Significance Comments
1 Broad heterocyclic structure with substituents Core protective claim Encompasses multiple chemical variants
6-13 Therapeutic methods Use-based protection Validates patent's relevance for drug approval
19 Pharmaceutical formulations Commercial applicability Ensures protection of sale forms

Comparison with Contemporary Patents

Aspect US 6,251,895 EP 0881823 US 5,788,362 Innovation Standpoint
Focus Broad heterocycle DPP-IV inhibitors Specific heterocycle classes Early-stage DPP-IV inhibitors US patent offers broader scope
Claim Breadth High Narrower Narrow US 6,251,895 provides wider coverage
Priority Date 1997 1997 1996 Consistent, early lead in the field
Market Impact Foundational Foundational Foundational Highly influential

FAQs

Q1: What specific chemical structures are covered by U.S. Patent 6,251,895?
The patent claims heterocyclic compounds with specified substituents, predominantly derivatives of cyanopyrrolidine and related heterocycles designed to inhibit DPP-IV enzyme activity.

Q2: How does this patent compare with later DPP-IV inhibitors like Sitagliptin?
While Sitagliptin (U.S. Pat. No. 6,502,072) was developed later, it operates within the broader scope of DPP-IV inhibitors. The 6,251,895 patent's broad claims potentially cover early compound classes used as a basis for subsequent drug development.

Q3: Are the claims of this patent still enforceable?
Given its filing date (1997) and expiry in 2021, the patent would have expired, limiting enforceability. However, during active years, it provided strong protection for claimed compounds and methods.

Q4: Did the patent face significant legal challenges?
No publicly documented legal challenges or patent oppositions are recorded against U.S. 6,251,895, suggesting its validity was maintained during its term.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence current development of DPP-IV inhibitors?
The landscape demonstrates a progression from broad heterocyclic classes toward specific, optimized compounds. Expired patents opened opportunities for generic manufacturers, while active patents guide current R&D directions for novel inhibitors.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: U.S. 6,251,895 covers broad heterocyclic compounds capable of inhibiting DPP-IV, pivotal in type 2 diabetes treatment.
  • Claims Analysis: Encompasses chemical structures, therapeutic methods, and formulations, providing extensive protection.
  • Patent Landscape: Overlap with prior art exists, but its broad claims strengthened its position; subsequent innovations have built upon its foundational work.
  • Commercial Impact: The patent played a significant role in early DPP-IV inhibitor development, influencing subsequent drug approvals and market strategies.
  • Expiration & Opportunities: The patent is now expired; this provides space for generic development while current innovations may focus on NCEs with improved properties.

References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 6,251,895. Abbott Laboratories. June 26, 2001.
[2] European Patent EP 0881823. Boehringer Ingelheim. 1997.
[3] U.S. Patent No. 5,788,362. Doc Generici S.r.l. 1998.
[4] U.S. Patent No. 6,124,218. Merck & Co. 2000.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,251,895

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,251,895

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 009801 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 221074 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 4424197 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 720366 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 9711541 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2266444 ⤷  Start Trial
China 1146567 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.