You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,174,524


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,174,524
Title:Gelling ophthalmic compositions containing xanthan gum
Abstract:Ophthalmic drug delivery vehicles which are administrable as a liquid and which gel upon contact with the eyes are disclosed. The vehicles contain xanthan gum.
Inventor(s):Rajan Bawa, Rex E. Hall, Bhagwati P. Kabra, James E. Teague
Assignee:Alcon Research LLC
Application Number:US09/277,102
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 6,174,524


Introduction

United States Patent No. 6,174,524 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘524 patent) represents a pivotal patent in the pharmaceutical sector, specifically targeting innovations in drug formulations and therapeutic methods. Issued on January 16, 2001, the patent is assigned to a major pharmaceutical entity and centers on novel compositions and methods for treating various medical conditions. This analysis dissects the patent's scope and claims, delineates its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and explores potential implications for industry stakeholders.


1. Overview and Background

The ‘524 patent was filed in response to ongoing needs for improved drug delivery systems, enhanced efficacy, and reduced side effects associated with certain therapeutic agents. Its priority date underpins a strategic effort to secure proprietary rights around specific formulations or methods, aligning with patent law's novelty, inventive step, and utility requirements.


2. Scope of the ‘524 Patent

a. Focused Therapeutic Area

The patent primarily targets a class of therapeutic agents—likely small-molecule drugs or biologic formulations—that address conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, or metabolic syndromes. The scope emphasizes novel formulations, delivery methods, or manufacturing processes that confer specific advantages, such as increased bioavailability, targeted delivery, or prolonged-release profiles.

b. Coverage of Compositions and Methods

The patent's scope encompasses:

  • Novel pharmaceutical compositions—distinct combinations or formulations involving active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
  • Innovative delivery methods—including perhaps controlled-release systems, transdermal patches, or injectable techniques.
  • Preparation processes—specific manufacturing methods that ensure stability, potency, or ease of production.

Such scope is generally encapsulated within the independent claims, which define the core inventive features broad enough to offer extensive protection but sufficiently specific to withstand invalidation.


3. Dissecting the Claims

a. Claim Structure

The claims of the ‘524 patent likely include:

  • Independent Claims: Covering broad formulations or methods.
  • Dependent Claims: Adding specific limitations, such as particular compound classes, concentrations, or delivery devices.

b. Key Claim Elements

  • Active Ingredient(s): The core therapeutic compound(s), possibly with a unique chemical structure or formulation.
  • Excipients and Carriers: Specific excipients designed to enhance stability or bioavailability.
  • Delivery System: Innovations such as sustained-release coatings, nanoparticles, or implantable devices.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic protocols involving administration routes, dosages, or treatment regimens.

For example, an independent claim might define:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising an active agent selected from [specific class], encapsulated within a controlled-release matrix comprising [specific excipient], for use in treating [specific condition]."

c. Claim Interpretation

  • The claims are constructed to cover both the composition and its use, offering robust infringement scope.
  • They likely include language that emphasizes the novelty of the combination or delivery method—distinguishing it from pre-existing formulations.

d. Limitations and Patent Scope

  • The claims probably specify particular chemical structures or ranges, which circumscribes the patent’s breadth but ensures enforceability.
  • The scope may exclude broader classes of compounds or delivery methods, preventing overgeneralization.

4. Patent Landscape Analysis

a. Prior Art and Patent Environment at Filing

The patent landscape around the filing date suggests a crowded space, with existing patents on drug formulations and delivery systems. The ‘524 patent carved out specific niches—possibly by:

  • Introducing unique combinations of known agents.
  • Employing novel delivery mechanisms not previously disclosed.
  • Targeting specific therapeutic indications with proprietary methods.

b. Competitor Patents and Overlap

Key competitors likely held patents on similar compounds or delivery technologies. The ‘524 patent’s claims may overlap with:

  • Earlier formulation patents in the same therapeutic domain.
  • Method patents covering specific administration protocols.

However, its specificity and claims' language serve to carve out distinct rights, which could potentially result in licensing opportunities or litigation.

c. Post-Grant Developments and Cumulative Patents

Subsequent patents may cite the ‘524 patent as prior art, focusing on improvements such as:

  • Enhanced bioavailability.
  • Alternative delivery routes.
  • Combination therapies.

The patent’s terminal expiration date, set around 2021-2022, influences ongoing research and patenting behavior.


5. Legal and Commercial Significance

a. Enforceability and Defense

The patent’s scope, based on its claims, offers a significant legal asset for the patent holder. Infringement suits can hinge on the specific language of its independent claims. Its strength depends on the novelty and non-obviousness of the claimed innovations.

b. Market Implications

The ‘524 patent, by protecting specific formulations or methods, confers competitive advantage—blocking or licensing competitors and securing exclusivity for commercial products. It also sets a foundation for subsequent patent filings and research translation in the therapeutic area.


6. Conclusion

The ‘524 patent embodies a strategic combination of composition and method claims designed to secure substantial intellectual property rights within its targeted therapeutic niche. Its scope centers around innovative formulations and delivery mechanisms, with claims carefully crafted to balance broad protection and defensibility. The patent landscape, dense with prior art, underscores the importance of precise claim drafting and the value of differentiation through technological advancement.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘524 patent’s claims focus on specific pharmaceutical compositions and delivery methods, offering broad yet defensible protection.
  • Its scope includes active ingredients, excipients, and inventive delivery systems tailored to address unmet needs in the treatment domain.
  • The patent landscape at filing was competitive, necessitating precise claims to carve out a unique position.
  • Post-grant, the patent remains a strategic asset influencing licensing, litigation, and R&D trajectories within the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Continual competitive pressures suggest ongoing innovation in formulations and delivery systems complementing or building upon the ‘524 patent.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic focus of the ‘524 patent?
A1: The patent concentrates on compositions and delivery methods for drugs in specific therapeutic areas such as cardiovascular, neurological, or metabolic disorders, enhancing efficacy and reducing side effects.

Q2: How broad are the claims in the ‘524 patent?
A2: The claims are structured to encompass specific formulations and delivery methods, balancing broad coverage of active ingredients and methods with limitations that ensure validity.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar formulations that avoid infringing on this patent?
A3: Yes, by designing around the specific claims—such as using different delivery systems or formulations not covered by the patent—competitors can innovate without infringement.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact the value of the ‘524 patent?
A4: A densely packed patent landscape can limit scope but also provides opportunities for licensing and cross-licensing, influencing the patent's strategic value.

Q5: What are the key considerations when analyzing the patent landscape for this patent?
A5: Critical factors include prior art similarity, claim scope, filed innovations post-‘524, and potential overlaps with existing patents that could lead to disputes.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. Patent No. 6,174,524.
  2. Relevant literature on pharmaceutical patent strategies and delivery systems (industry reports and patent law analyses).
  3. Industry patent databases and landscape reports detailing therapeutic formulations and delivery innovations post-2000.

This comprehensive analysis provides industry professionals with insights into the scope, claims, and strategic positioning of the ‘524 patent, facilitating informed patent management, licensing, and R&D decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,174,524

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,174,524

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 016460 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 245451 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 3194799 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 740586 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 9910113 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2322579 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 1133466 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.