Details for Patent: 6,143,329
Summary for Patent: 6,143,329
| Title: | Aqueous-based pharmaceutical composition | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | An aqueous pharmaceutical composition which is capable of being sprayed into the nasal cavity of an individual and which comprises: (A) a pharmaceutically effective amount of solid particles of medicament which is effective in treating a bodily condition by virtue of its being present on the mucosal surfaces of the nasal cavity; and (B) a suspending agent in an amount effective to maintain said particles dispersed uniformly in the composition and to impart to the composition the following thixotropic properties: (i) the viscosity of the position in unsheared form is relatively high, with the composition being in gel-like form; (ii) as the composition is subjected to shear (shaken) in preparation for spraying, the viscosity of the composition becomes relatively low and such that the composition in the form of a mist flows readily into the nasal passages for deposit on the mucosal surfaces of the nasal cavity; and (iii) in deposited form on the mucosal surfaces, the viscosity of the composition is relatively high and such that it resists being cleared from the mucosal surfaces by the inherent mucocillary forces which are present in the nasal cavity, a method of use of the composition and a method for preparation of the composition, including in preferred form the use of anti-inflammatory steroid, for example, trimcindone acetonide, and an odorless form of the composition. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Soo-Il Kim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US09/315,454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Composition; Delivery; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | US Drug Patent 6,143,329: Scope, Claims, Expiration, Orange Book Status, and Triamcinolone Nasal Spray Patent LandscapeUS Patent 6,143,329 covers a propellant-free, aqueous triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray using a microcrystalline cellulose/carboxymethylcellulose suspending system to create thixotropic behavior. The patent claims the formulation, the spray-device combination, allergic-rhinitis treatment methods, and regional nasal deposition characteristics. The patent’s commercial value was concentrated in the Nasacort AQ formulation and delivery system. Its ordinary 20-year patent term has expired, eliminating current patent-based exclusivity from this patent. Triamcinolone acetonide is a small molecule, so biosimilar rules do not apply. Current competition is governed primarily by FDA approval status, OTC availability, manufacturing capability, formulation differentiation, trademarks, and any later patents rather than by US Patent 6,143,329. What does US Patent 6,143,329 cover?The patent covers four related subject-matter groups:
The central technical concept is a reversible viscosity change:
The principal formulation limitation is a suspending agent consisting of approximately 85% to 95% microcrystalline cellulose and 5% to 15% carboxymethylcellulose, based on the weight of that mixture. Independent claim 1 also requires:
The open-ended term “comprises” means that additional ingredients generally do not avoid the claim if all required limitations remain present. What are the independent claims in US 6,143,329?Claim 1: Formulation claimClaim 1 is the principal composition claim. It requires all of the following:
A competing product that uses triamcinolone acetonide in a solution rather than as solid suspended particles would fall outside the literal particle limitation of claim 1. A product using a different suspending system could also avoid literal infringement if it does not contain the claimed cellulose mixture, although an equivalence analysis would depend on the facts and the applicable legal record. Claim 6: Device and composition combinationClaim 6 covers an article of manufacture containing:
This claim is narrower than a formulation-only claim because it requires the specified packaging and dispensing arrangement. It does not repeat every numerical limitation in claim 1. Its composition language is comparatively functional, requiring a suspension that becomes more flowable during shaking and more viscous after deposition. Claim 13: Specific formulation and deviceClaim 13 claims a formulation, vessel, and precompression pump containing:
This is the claim most closely associated with the commercial formulation architecture of Nasacort AQ. Because claim 13 is written with “comprising,” it is not limited to a formulation containing only those listed ingredients. It also does not expressly import all concentration and viscosity ranges from claim 1. Claim 14: Allergic-rhinitis treatment methodClaim 14 covers administering the aqueous thixotropic composition by spraying a full dose into a nostril, with deposition on nasal mucosa and resistance to mucociliary clearance. The claim is directed to a method of use rather than merely to the product. A method claim can be infringed by performance of the claimed treatment steps, subject to the relevant patent-law standards governing direct and induced infringement. Claim 25: Nasal and sinus delivery methodClaim 25 covers delivering the composition to:
This claim is technically important because it focuses on deposition location rather than only on drug identity or formulation ingredients. Claims 26 through 29 add the cellulose-based suspending-agent system and specified two-hour deposition percentages. How do the dependent claims narrow the patent?The dependent claims add excipients, dosage parameters, device features, treatment schedules, and deposition outcomes.
The numerical deposition claims are narrower and more difficult to read on a competing product unless the competitor has comparable clinical or imaging data. They are also more vulnerable to evidentiary disputes because infringement may require reliable testing of deposition or retention. What formulation is associated with the patent?The claimed formulation architecture corresponds to a preserved, aqueous nasal suspension containing triamcinolone acetonide. The principal functional ingredients are:
The claimed technology depends on particle suspension rather than complete dissolution. The cellulose combination gives the formulation a gel-like resting state while allowing reduced viscosity after shaking. The formulation therefore addresses three product-development problems simultaneously: dose uniformity, sprayability, and nasal residence time. When did US Patent 6,143,329 expire?US Patent 6,143,329 is an issued US utility patent with a 20-year term measured from the applicable nonprovisional filing date under the pre-Uruguay Round patent-term framework. Public patent records identify the patent as issued on November 7, 2000. Its ordinary patent term expired in 2018 based on the underlying US filing chronology, subject to any legally applicable patent-term adjustment or extension shown in the official patent record. The patent is no longer a live US exclusivity right. [1] The expiration has several consequences:
The patent’s expiration date should be distinguished from regulatory exclusivity and market exclusivity. Those rights arise under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and may expire on different dates. What is the Orange Book status of US Patent 6,143,329?The FDA Orange Book identifies patents and exclusivity associated with approved drug products, but Orange Book status must be evaluated against the specific NDA and product listing. A patent can be expired even if it historically appeared in the Orange Book. For triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray, the relevant branded product is Nasacort AQ, associated with FDA-approved nasal-spray labeling and an NDA held within the Sanofi/Aventis commercial history. FDA labeling identifies triamcinolone acetonide as a corticosteroid nasal spray for allergic rhinitis. [2] The commercial and regulatory position is:
FDA approved the prescription-to-OTC switch for Nasacort Allergy 24HR in 2013. The OTC product is marketed for relief of allergy symptoms, including nasal congestion, sneezing, and runny nose, under an FDA-approved labeling framework. [3] Were there Paragraph IV challenges or settlements involving this patent?A Paragraph IV certification is an ANDA applicant’s assertion that an Orange Book-listed patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed. It is relevant only while a listed patent remains legally enforceable and listed against an NDA product. Because US Patent 6,143,329 has expired, it cannot presently create a Paragraph IV stay or a current 30-month litigation stay. Any historical ANDA challenge would have had commercial significance before expiration, but the patent does not now block an ANDA or other lawful generic development. No current exclusivity analysis should treat this patent as an effective barrier to entry. A historical settlement, if any, would not revive the expired patent or create a new term. A settlement could still have relevance to historical launch timing or damages, but it would not provide current patent exclusivity. Which companies are associated with the triamcinolone nasal spray market?The relevant commercial participants include:
The branded product’s competitive position changed materially after the OTC switch. The market moved from a physician-prescription product protected by brand recognition and regulatory positioning toward a consumer-health category with store-brand and generic alternatives. How strong was the patent estate for Nasacort AQ?US Patent 6,143,329 was technically meaningful but commercially narrow in several respects. Strengths
Limitations
The patent was stronger against a substantially identical suspension and pump presentation than against all triamcinolone nasal products. It was not a broad monopoly over intranasal corticosteroids, triamcinolone acetonide generally, or every nasal spray formulation. What generic launch risks exist today?A current competitor faces regulatory and commercial risks rather than a live barrier from Patent 6,143,329. Regulatory risksA generic or private-label product must satisfy FDA requirements for:
Manufacturing risksThe cellulose suspension is sensitive to:
These factors may create manufacturing know-how and quality-control barriers even though the patent claims have expired. Commercial risksThe main commercial risks are:
These are market barriers, not patent exclusions arising from US 6,143,329. How does US Patent 6,143,329 compare with biosimilar and generic exclusivity?Triamcinolone acetonide is a chemically synthesized small molecule. A competing product is therefore evaluated through an ANDA, an OTC pathway, or another applicable small-molecule route. The product is not a biologic, and a biosimilar application under section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act is not the relevant pathway. The practical distinction is:
Does US Patent 6,143,329 create current freedom-to-operate concerns?The patent itself does not create a current US patent exclusion because it has expired. A freedom-to-operate review must still examine:
The expired patent remains relevant as prior art. Its disclosures may affect the validity and scope of later patent claims directed to similar triamcinolone suspension systems. Key Takeaways
FAQs About US Patent 6,143,329Is triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray still protected by US Patent 6,143,329?No. US Patent 6,143,329 has expired and does not provide current US patent exclusivity. Can a generic use the same microcrystalline cellulose and carboxymethylcellulose system?Yes, the expired patent does not prevent use of its claimed formulation technology. A competitor must still satisfy FDA requirements and avoid infringement of any later unexpired patents. Does the patent cover all Nasacort products?No. It focuses on a particular aqueous suspension architecture, delivery system, and treatment methods. It does not cover every formulation or dosage form containing triamcinolone acetonide. Is a triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray a biosimilar?No. Triamcinolone acetonide is a small-molecule corticosteroid. Competing products use generic-drug or applicable OTC regulatory pathways, not biosimilar approval. Can the expired patent be used to challenge a later patent?Yes. The patent’s disclosure and claims may constitute prior art against later patent claims, subject to the later patent’s filing date, priority chain, statutory framework, and claim limitations. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,143,329
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 6,143,329
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) | 1045 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) | 9901495 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Austria | 250432 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 3647197 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 737506 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Bulgaria | 103127 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
