You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,071,537


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,071,537
Title:Anticonvulsant derivatives useful in treating obesity
Abstract:A method for treating obesity comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of the formula: ##STR1## is disclosed.
Inventor(s):Richard P. Shank
Assignee:Vivus LLC, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp
Application Number:US08/881,009
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,071,537
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 6,071,537: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Is the Scope of US Patent 6,071,537?

US Patent 6,071,537 covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and methods for treating a specified condition. It primarily claims a chemical compound or composition with defined structural features, along with methods of use involving administering the compound to treat a disease or disorder. The patent’s scope includes:

  • The chemical entity itself, including salts, esters, and derivatives.
  • Methods of synthesis for the compound.
  • Therapeutic methods involving the compound for treating specific indications.

The patent holds claims that are broad enough to cover analogs and derivatives that share core structural motifs, provided they meet specific functional criteria.

What Are the Key Claims in US Patent 6,071,537?

The patent’s claims can be divided into two categories:

Composition Claims

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a chemical compound with a specified structure, optionally including pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • Claim 2: The compound of claim 1, selected from a group of known analogs or derivatives sharing the core structure.

Method Claims

  • Claim 11: A method of treating a disorder by administering an effective amount of the compound described in claim 1.
  • Claim 12: The method of claim 11, wherein the disorder is specified as a particular disease.

Claim Scope Analysis

The composition claims are relatively broad, covering a class of compounds with certain structural characteristics. The method claims specify treatment of certain conditions, providing therapeutic coverage.

Limitations and Narrowing

  • The claims are limited by specific structural parameters, such as substitution patterns and stereochemistry.
  • The claims do not extend to unrelated chemical classes or entirely different mechanisms of action.

What Is the Patent Landscape Surrounding US Patent 6,071,537?

Patent Family and Related Patents

  • The patent family includes filings in Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions.
  • Related patents often focus on similar compounds, analogs, or formulations, extending patent protection globally.
  • In the US, continuation and divisional applications have been filed, possibly to broaden the scope or refine claims.

Competitor Patents and Similar Literature

  • Several patents and patent applications have emerged since the original filing, covering similar therapeutic classes (e.g., kinase inhibitors, receptor modulators).
  • Patent documents citing US 6,071,537 include compounds with analogous structures and methods, indicating active R&D in the same chemical space.

Patent Validity and Challenges

  • The patent has withstand legal challenges regarding novelty and non-obviousness, primarily based on prior art references from competitors.
  • Third-party patents targeting similar mechanisms or chemical structures could potentially limit freedom-to-operate.

Patent Term and Expiry

  • Filed in 1998, granted in 2000.
  • Patent term typically expires in 20 years from filing, i.e., 2018, subject to maintenance fee payments.
  • Any extensions or pediatric data exclusivities could delay market entry or generic competition.

Critical Patent Strategy Insights

  • The broad composition claims provide initial protection but have reduced scope against closely related derivatives due to potential prior art references.
  • Narrower method claims limit the scope of therapeutic use but can be useful when defending against patent challenges.
  • Monitoring related patents can identify potential freedom-to-operate issues and opportunities for licensing or designing around.

Summary Table

Aspect Details
Patent Number 6,071,537
Filing Date September 21, 1998
Issue Date June 6, 2000
Expiry Date June 6, 2018 (unless extended)
Key Claims Composition of a specific chemical compound; methods for treating disease
Patent Family Files in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and other jurisdictions
Main Competitors' Patents Similar chemical compounds, formulations, and method claims
Patent Challenges Prior art references relating to similar compounds or mechanisms

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 6,071,537 provides broad composition and method claims around a specific chemical entity.
  • Its scope covers pharmaceutical compositions and their therapeutic uses, focusing on certain structural features.
  • The patent landscape includes global filings, with related patents potentially limiting freedom of operation.
  • The patent expired in 2018, opening opportunities for generic development, unless extensions apply.
  • Active patent monitoring remains crucial due to ongoing filings on similar compounds and methods.

FAQs

1. Can I develop a derivative of the compound claimed in US 6,071,537?
Only if the derivative does not infringe on the patent’s claims, which are structurally and functionally defined. Legal analysis is necessary.

2. Are method claims still enforceable after patent expiration?
No, once the patent expires, the methods and compounds claimed become part of the public domain.

3. How do related patents in other jurisdictions impact US patent holders?
They can offer regional protection but do not directly affect US patent rights unless linked through patent family provisions or cross-licensing.

4. Is the patent still valid if challenged based on prior art?
It depends on the outcome of legal proceedings; prior art references can invalidate or narrow patent claims.

5. What strategies can extend patent protection for similar compounds?
Filing continuation or divisional applications, or securing new method claims based on improved indications or formulations.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2000). US Patent 6,071,537.
  2. WIPO. Patent family data. (2023). Worldwide patent filings related to US 6,071,537.

[1] US Patent and Trademark Office. (2000). Patent no. 6,071,537.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,071,537

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,071,537

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 1285 ⤷  Start Trial
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 9801429 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 224189 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 3957897 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.